It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Merely pointing out to you that this wasn't hard to find. In fact, it was the first one in the Google search.
Which shows just how thorough and comprehensive your search for truth is.
This?:
Yep. the building collapses.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by bsbray11
If you can't post what I ask for then just "sack up and just say you don't want to answer."
I can answer just fine.
But you need to answer what amount of evidence and corroboration will convince you that something has been proven.
Originally posted by bsbray11
According to NIST it would be the same decibel level as a jackhammer. And have you proven that any of the reported or recorded explosions were any quieter than that? No. So you are arguing from ignorance once again.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Wow.
So I provide a report that shows just how prevalent barotrauma is in a bona fide explosion. This not due to it being just "loud".
Reread - this time for comprehension - the definition of just what barotrauma actually is.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Googling information from the CDC and then presenting it as an incorruptible authority has nothing to do with "truth."
Did you actually look at that image for any length of time?
Originally posted by bsbray11
How about, you show me everything you've got?
Take your best shot at it.
Can you do that?
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Sure.
NIST has proven to every professional whose opinion is worth listening to - and they agree with their own independent evaluations in many cases - that plane impacts and fire, or just fire in WTC 7, is enough to cause a global collapse.
And that there is zero need, nor any indication of, explosives bringing down the towers/7.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
especially since trillions of dollars were 'lost' as reported a day earlier
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by MemoryShock
especially since trillions of dollars were 'lost' as reported a day earlier
Wow.
You don't exactly do much research, do you?
Originally posted by bsbray11
I meant I wanted to see how they actually proved this.
You have no actual proof, it's all just pretend for you.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by bsbray11
I meant I wanted to see how they actually proved this.
Then you should read the NIST report and the independent studies and the independent peer reviewed papers and the views of professional organizations such as the CTBUH on the matter.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Would you like anything else with that crow?
Originally posted by bsbray11.
I'd still like to see where you think they proved anything in their report
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by bsbray11
Would you like anything else with that crow?
In addition to the 9/10 news conference, it was also reported on 03/03/00 in the Associated Press of these issues.
This is old debunked claptrap.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by bsbray11.
I'd still like to see where you think they proved anything in their report
Like I said, they have proven that plane impacts anf fire was responsiblle.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Like I said, they have proven that plane impacts anf fire was responsiblle.