It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

IMF Leader Arrested After Alleged Sex Attack

page: 21
65
<< 18  19  20    22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 20 2011 @ 02:26 PM
link   
For information, Banon has decided not to file a complaint for now. I won't draw any conclusions. Only her allegations remain allegations.

French woman won't demand charges against IMF head

edit on 20-5-2011 by Manouche because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 20 2011 @ 02:29 PM
link   
It's predjudice to say this but...

She is a single mother, who is a US immigrant and living in an AIDS shelter.


This man is a millionaire, who is married... If he wanted sex that bad, he could afford to pay a beautiful lady to come directly to his door.

Plus he called the hotel TWICE asking about his lost phone....



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 12:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Manouche

Originally posted by AuranVector
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
 


I wondered what DSK was doing at the Sofitel. I mean was his Manhattan apartment being re-decorated or remodeled?


I have not heard he has an apartment in Manhattan. He will rent an apartment until the trial.
His daughter lives in NYC, she is a student at Columbia University. Does she live in her parents apartment ?

Soon, we will probably know who owns the apartment he is renting or how it was found. He's not that rich, his wife IS. She was born and raised in the US. She has money and probably connections.

I don't know if he is a Zionist, he denies the quote attributed to him and that had him this reputation.


So much conflicting info. I don't trust the US mainstream news -- the story is being reported as if there is no question of DSK's guilt. We are not getting the details.

I still think he was set up. This is a power play among the Global Elite.



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 06:10 AM
link   
reply to post by CanadianDream420
 





If he wanted sex that bad, he could afford to pay a beautiful lady to come directly to his door.


It would appear that Nafissatou Dialo (that can't be her real name.....) used her room key card to enter the suite for the purposes of preparing it for the next occupant. Its probably not uncommon for guests to sleep in late so there is probably a protocol for shooing them out so she could get her work done. Maybe Strauss kahn was on something like Viagra (they say Viagra makes you deaf). The defense is going to have a hard time convincing the jury that this was all a misunderstanding.



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 06:26 AM
link   
Don´t know if it was already asked,but...

Why is someone,who has (is that confirmed?) AIDS, even allowed to clean up Rooms in a Hotel?

I have nothing against those poor People,but as far as i understand,they are not allowed to work in Kitchens or Hospitals for example because the Infection Risk is too high or something like that...



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 10:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Shenon
 


It has not been confirmed. I don't see why she shouldn't be allowed this job anyway. It's irrelevant for now.



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 10:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Bordon81
 


No, he was not thrown out and there is no hidden protocol to make the best guests in the best suite leave. That wouldn't be the maids job anyway.

The last story is that when the maid arrived, the door was open, an employee of the room service was in the room cleaning up after the breakfast. She asked if she could start cleaning, the other employee answered that yes, the guest was gone.



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 02:14 PM
link   
Non-stop attacking of the victim is STILL considered "unbiased."

My disgust with most of the posters in these threads is unbounded.



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 02:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aeons
Non-stop attacking of the victim is STILL considered "unbiased."

My disgust with most of the posters in these threads is unbounded.


alleged victim. Unless, of course, you have some inside information that allows you to know what really happeend Care to share?

That's the genius of the set-up. Because it allows people like you to discount the layers and layers of suspicious and contradictory information as merely 'blaming he victim' who just so happens to be a poor, african singe mother refuge. Genius. The head of the IMF caught raping a poor african woman refuge (who might have HIV). I mean, what a GREAT metaphor for what the IMF has historically done.

The fact that you keep entering this thread and all other DSK-related threads to claim any and all are 'blaming the victim' despite the fact no one actually is makes me suspect you have made up your mind about this story before all the facts have surfaced. Funny, too, since this is a site that historically rejects the MSM's official story. I guess when the news supports your world-view you are more apt to believe it unquestioningly.

So, sure, believe the official story. Dont question anything. Accept it all. Anyone who asks questions probably hates women. Great approach


edit on 21-5-2011 by incrediblelousminds because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 02:31 PM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 04:18 PM
link   
This woman is not insisting that charges are pressed. She hasn't come out and said anything. They said she was quite and shy. Everyone should back off her. I don't know what is true and what isn't when I read articles about so and so said this and that, but if she is in asalym here (from my understanding basically a refugee from her country and our govt helps?) then she's probably had a pretty traumatic life. Now this happens she doesn't need eyes on her. I could be totally wrong, this could be a woman with an agenda out to make some money, however, I don't see it that way. I have the craziest things happen to me, It all depends on circumstances. Thats why when two people are in a relationship you hear not to assume you really know whats going on behind closed doors... ESP. is true in a rape case! I feel horrible for this woman if she is sitting there violated and has rumors going around about aids, even nude photos of a woman that may i add is NOT the accuser. I found her fb pageand she had on her wall that she was really aggravated of people putting her in the spotlight negitivly for no reason when it wasn't even her and mentioned sueing. I scrolled down and read other comments and this is a real page. Her wall WAS public; not anymore Look at this link. The picture they are circulating saying is her is the younger woman on facebook in the first link. The thing is no one knows who this woman is. We don't know if she has aids or if she is pretty or if she was out to get him or not. We don't know anything. I think we should respect her at least I can't imagine something like happening to me then being ripped apart by half of the world. Can you?
edit on 21-5-2011 by xxPUSH0Noo because: grammer

edit on 21-5-2011 by xxPUSH0Noo because: x2



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 04:34 PM
link   
The fact you feel the need to assassinate the character of anyone who doesnt by the MSM's clearly biased story on this is noteworthy.

I have not 'gone after' this woman. I have investigated several contradictory aspects of the story and not ruled out any possible motives.

I think it's great that you believe the official story (in all it's glorious contradictions), but I am still waiting to see what the truth is. And I doubt it is as the MSM says.

So, instead of attacking those who are researching, why not do some of your own research?
edit on 5-21-2011 by chissler because: Mod edit: Removed quoted post that was previously removed by staff.



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 04:35 PM
link   
& to address the reason as to DSK did what he did: I am 23 yr old female & I have encountered a lot of creepy old men in my life. I also worked in a strip club as a waitress for 2 weeks back when I was young and believe me the scariest most aggressive guys (with other girls.. not me) were professionals, usually big CEO execs. or bosses of companies. Have you guys ever heard of "Bossman Syndrome"? you know when you see a guy who is a owner/boss of a company but he takes his boss ways home with him.. and to the restaurant.. or even to his daughters school. DSK could of very well had a touch of that in the position he is in.
edit on 21-5-2011 by xxPUSH0Noo because: proofreading



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 07:45 PM
link   
Im just reporting what I heard from ABC news.

They say 2 women from his past are now surfacing with news about his sexual advances.

They say the maid was in shock and in nausea.

They say his extremely wealthy wife paid for his bail and bond and also his current living circumstances in NY.

They also pulled a quote from his wife that she said in the past about accepting his 'seductions' and that being seductive is part of politics.

Anyway...



posted on May, 21 2011 @ 11:53 PM
link   
Anderson Cooper talked to defense attorney Mark Geragos and Eliot Spitzer Friday night about the DSK case.

A link to their discussion is pasted below.

According to Geragos, virtually every case that comes before the grand jury is indicted. He referred to it as a rubber stamp. That's useful information because when I read he had been indicted I began to wonder if perhaps there was a strong case against him.

Geragos also noted that the many inconsistent details that have emerged may have been leaked by the prosecution, specifically the police in this case. That makes sense given that the police initially claimed that he was in a hurry to leave New York. More recently, they apparently claimed that he didn't question why he was being arrested, suggesting he knew the reason. Given that he previously stated he was likely to be set up, he probably wasn't all that surprised by the arrest.

ac360.blogs.cnn.com...



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 12:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Reaching
 


i suspect he may have been guilty of soemthing. But i also suspect that the police were giving such speculative comments regarding his guilt to the press so the case will be dismissed. And since the point was to remove him from head of the IMF (which has happened), whether he is convicted is irrelevant.

Sarkozy is happy, too, i'm sure. Although if the case gets dismissed, DSK may still be able o win in France (it might actually HELP him).



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 12:36 AM
link   
I find this book to be off interest in that it speaks to the psychology of the defenders of rapists.

Rape work: victims, gender and emotions in organization and community context By Patricia Yancey Martin

books.google.ca... f59a8&hl=en&ei=hJ3YTbnIJ-Ox0QHLjaX8Aw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CB0Q6AEwATgK#v=onepage&q&f=false

Worth a read through.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 12:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


how does that relate to the thread?

Who here is defending a rapist?



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 12:56 AM
link   
In this case no one is defending a rapist.

He is innocent until proven guilty.



posted on May, 22 2011 @ 01:50 AM
link   
The real conspiracy angle here is probably the timing of the 'Arnold's love child' story.

Somebody must have been sitting on that one for the right moment, and then they busted it out to take attention away form the scrutiny on the socialist DSK.


Originally posted by Reaching
In this case no one is defending a rapist.

He is innocent until proven guilty.


Wake up from the court room tv show BS for a moment and come back to reality.

So a rapist is not a rapist when they rape somebody, they later become a rapist when a court of law agrees that they raped somebody?

Do defense attorneys only defend rapists if they lose their case? Can they win their case and still have been defending a rapist? Can truly guilty people get away with crimes? Can truly innocent people be convicted?

A court of law is not life. Life is not a court of law.

He is LEGALLY innocent in a court of law until proven LEGALLY guilty.

Whether or not he is legally found guilty does not correlate 100% with whether or not he actually raped somebody.

In life, he is a rapist if and when he raped somebody, no matter whether any court of law agrees or not.

Similarly, in life, he is not a rapist if he did not rape anybody no matter what any court of law ever says about it.

Thus, if he is truly innocent, then nobody in this thread who is defending him is defending a rapist.

Thus, if he is truly guilty, then EVERYONE in this thread who is defending him is defending a rapist.

...

How do I feel about it?

This guy will get very close to having the best possible legal defense team on the planet earth.

His team are already manipulating the media more than anybody. In fact, they are being paid lots and lots of money already to do that as part of his defense. Unless some other person or faction is spending money to do this sort of thing for their own agenda(and what evidence of that is there?), then it's most likely that his team is by far the largest and most active on the game board.

We are already seeing many common tactics which academics have long been aware of, for example as posted in a link a few posts up by Aeons.

Everyone ought to know that rich and powerful assholes/sociopaths do do this sort of thing...'you are nothing, nobody will believe you.'

That is also why other women wait to come forward until somebody else has taken the first step. The first step is the scariest because the fear is that help and attention will never arrive.

When there is media attention, there is the presumption of safety and protection, that he can't use his power and money and influence to crush somebody who is already in the public eye.

Or...just watch a few episodes of "Cheaters" if you don't believe that there are lots and lots and lots of people who are capable of keeping up a facade of innocence and who will just lie lie lie lie lie and never drop the facade no matter how busted they are. There is a very ordinary and common sort of narcissism you see a lot when you watch liars in action.
edit on 22-5-2011 by 11andrew34 because: typos and rephrasing.




top topics



 
65
<< 18  19  20    22  23 >>

log in

join