"Terror" attacks and the United states of america ?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 11-5-2011 @ 12:51 PM by THELONIO
reply to post by Skewed



apples and oranges are both still fruit, i understand what you have said but America does still recognise the taliban and alcaida as a military group to declare war on, the taliban were ruling in afghanistan and were still seen for some reason as terrorists, anyone who joined the fight against the invasion were called insurgents or combatants but never recognised as possible freedom fighters, if you look at occupied france during ww2, how did the germans view the french resistance?, did they see them as freedom fighters or terrorists, compare that with the views of the allies, the resistance spent their time carrying out acts of terrorism against the occupying force



reply posted on 12-5-2011 @ 09:28 AM by kevinunknown
The answer is a unequivocal yes.

I know that I don’t have the ability to give you a full and brief history on the motivations of terrorists but there are many good books on the subject. however if we look at one specific case, Osama Bin Laden it does illustrate how American foreign policy does lead to acts of terrorism. In the case of OBL’s grievances against America, most of it comes from his ideology but a example of how American foreign policy enforced this would be the events of the first Gulf war. During the early 1990’s America became worried that oil supplies from Saudi Arabia would become compromised so sent troops into Saudi as a deterrent. This in turn angered OBL who took the view that infidel forces had no right to have a presence in the “Land of the two holly places” and that this was blasphemy. Not only did this move from the Americans cause OBL to become angry with America but also his native Saudi.

In addition to this we also have more general foreign policy that understandable angers many in the Middle East, primarily the support of Israel but also the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the use of torture and the lack of support for states like Iran. Past interventions like the coup in the 1950’s in Iran, presence in the Palestinian territories and also what they see as being a “westernisation” of some Arabic states such as Egypt and Dubai. The list when you think about it does become really quite extensive
edit on 12-5-2011 by kevinunknown because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 14-5-2011 @ 08:46 PM by Skewed
reply to post by THELONIO



OBL had a family, wives to care for and kids to feed, but he was the enemy and he got what he got. Tough shi.....crap.

edit on 14-5-2011 by Skewed because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 15-5-2011 @ 07:16 AM by kevinunknown
reply to post by simone50m



The Taliban was not formed until 1994 by that time the CIA had long since left Afghanistan after the cold war. They did not have a hand in the formation of the Taliban.


reply posted on 15-5-2011 @ 07:35 AM by meathed
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to
post by simone50m



The Taliban was not formed until 1994 by that time the CIA had long since left Afghanistan after the cold war. They did not have a hand in the formation of the Taliban.


John Rambo did have a hand in starting the taliban up though, he did it in Rambo 3.
Seriously though I reckon the CIA DID help form the Taliban to fight against the Russian's. They might have had another name. but,,,,, it was still the taliban and the CIA still started them.
edit on 15-5-2011 by meathed because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-5-2011 by meathed because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Alert: Possible Terror-related activity in NW Ohio
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
\'Bin Laden died of natural causes\'
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Was it a drone that almost caused mid-air over Denver?
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
US shadow war in Horn of Africa revealed by blogger
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags