It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The concern that we have in this situation is that, whether a flag hanging on a bridge [not OTORA’s proposal], or a monument placed within a park and ride lot [the proposal], we would be placed in a position of having to permit all forms of expression as encroachments in the right of way if we were to allow yours. As such, the department has determined that the state highway system is not a forum for public expression except as expressly allowed.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
So they don't want to allow people putting up all sorts of things on the state highway system...
Originally posted by mishigas
The panel that ruled that the American flag could not be displayed demanded "viewpoint neutrality" at the monument.
Originally posted by 31Bravo
How can we be told that flying the U.S. flag is inappropriate during a funeral of a service member.
Originally posted by Watts
America is stupid. Literally.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
So they don't want to allow people putting up all sorts of things on the state highway system...
You beat me to it - I'm glad I wasn't the only person who actually read the link.
Is there any place where this sort of practice is actually LEGAL (the hanging of signs or flags or ANYTHING on or near state highway signs or other items)?
Sure it may often be overlooked, but really - I'm pretty sure it's not technically legal.
Originally posted by 31Bravo
How can we be told that flying the U.S. flag is inappropriate during a funeral of a service member.
But see - we're not being told this. We're being told that it's inappropriate to fly the flag from highway signs and overpasses.
sigh.
Originally posted by negativenihil
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
So they don't want to allow people putting up all sorts of things on the state highway system...
You beat me to it - I'm glad I wasn't the only person who actually read the link.
Is there any place where this sort of practice is actually LEGAL (the hanging of signs or flags or ANYTHING on or near state highway signs or other items)?
Sure it may often be overlooked, but really - I'm pretty sure it's not technically legal.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
is anyone gonna actually read the link?? come on...
The concern that we have in this situation is that, whether a flag hanging on a bridge [not OTORA’s proposal], or a monument placed within a park and ride lot [the proposal], we would be placed in a position of having to permit all forms of expression as encroachments in the right of way if we were to allow yours. As such, the department has determined that the state highway system is not a forum for public expression except as expressly allowed.
the department has determined that the state highway system is not a forum for public expression
So they don't want to allow people putting up all sorts of things on the state highway system...
Originally posted by sigung86
reply to post by Liquesence
American Troops dying in wars for America. Not Brits, French, Germans, or any of our friends from South America, or Canada... But Americans. Why would anyone who find it wrong to support the symbol of freedom that men and women are dying for, everyday, supporting the right to fly that flag?
So what other flag do you want to fly there?
Just curious.
Originally posted by The Old American
reply to post by Liquesence
Actually there is more to this. In 2003 people were hanging political signs and banners, as well as American flags on overpasses. CalTrans began removing the signs, but they left the flags. In Brown v. California Department of Transportation it was decided by the Kalifornia Supreme Court that what CalTrans was doing was in violation of the 1st Amendment:
Caltrans Policy on Flags Violates Freedom of Speech—Ninth Circuit
It's the principle involved in allowing other flags (or signs or banners) to be flown if someone should so desire.