It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrueAmericanWhy would the CIA have such a hard time identifying bin Laden when he was a CIA asset?
Originally posted by TKDRL
This story just keep piling on the BS.... It's like a cheesy made for cable movie or something..... WTF....
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
Cause he wasn't...
Until I see a direct deposit slip with his name on it, I will
strongly still believe he was an agravated terrorist.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by boondock-saint
It's crap like this story that makes me consider just building a huge fence around my yard, and killing anyone that crosses it. Live my life off the land, and screw the rest of the world lmao.
Originally posted by freakjive
I think this could also serve as evidence of who the would-be real-time tweeter is. What do you think?
The rented house was used as a base for one of the most extensive surveillance operations in the history of the CIA. The cost was so huge that it had to go to Congress to secure tens of millions of dollars of funding.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Maybe in a movie....but CIA blend into whatever location they are in. They do not look like some Jason Bourne sticking out like a sore thumb. Many probably have no contact with their family for long periods of time....
In regards to the topic.....of course they were there...intel must be gathered first. HUMINT is a must in any operation...not sure why this is even an issue? It seems pretty logical to me..
Of all stories told in this drama....this is the most believable IMO. And I dont even buy most of the stories...edit on May 6th 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)