It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Toxic Skies and What in the World Are They Spraying?

page: 6
6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 11 2011 @ 04:40 PM
link   
Too bad you can't measure persistence in a photograph or 20 second clip....




posted on May, 11 2011 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by dplum517
reply to post by Phage
 


As you and your friends like to say...

"Pictures or didn't happen"

Have you ever posted a single picture of anything you say is happening?

Come to think of it, ahve you ever posted whatever it is you think is happening, as opposed to just dissing everyone who does provide evidence that it isn't happening?

Figured out anything wrong over at Contrail Science yet?

Just curious......



posted on May, 11 2011 @ 04:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 

Interesting account from a 1957 magazine article.
Antarctica

edit on 5/11/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2011 @ 04:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by dplum517
Too bad you can't measure persistence in a photograph or 20 second clip....


Good point - glad you are finally admitting that all those stills & YT clips of "chemtrails" aren't actually evidence of what they claim they are.

Found anything wrong at Contrail Science yet?



posted on May, 11 2011 @ 04:54 PM
link   
Lol pictures or it didn't happen .... not one or the other

Not to mention...that's the south pole.

I can do this all day



posted on May, 11 2011 @ 04:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by dplum517
Too bad you can't measure persistence in a photograph or 20 second clip....


And here we have a textbook example of "moving the goalposts" . What was it you posted in your previous message??



As you and your friends like to say... "Pictures or didn't happen"


So you ask specifically for "pictures", and when even a video is produced that shows exactly what you wanted, now pics and videos are not good enough.



posted on May, 11 2011 @ 04:55 PM
link   
reply to post by dplum517
 




I can do this all day

Sure you can. It doesn't take any effort at all does it? Sort of like a kid saying "I know you are but what am I?"

But what you can't do is provide any evidence that contrails cannot persist or that "chemtrails" do.


edit on 5/11/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2011 @ 04:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by dplum517
Lol pictures or it didn't happen .... not one or the other

Not to mention...that's the south pole.

I can do this all day


Sigh , and you usually do .



posted on May, 11 2011 @ 05:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by dplum517
Lol pictures or it didn't happen .... not one or the other

Not to mention...that's the south pole.


Yes - that was precisely the point.


I can do this all day


we noticed - it's quite easy to post dismissive comments.

why don't you actually post some evidence for a change - come to think of it have you EVER posted any actual evidence pertaining to what it is you think chemtrails are?

It does seem that all you ever do is write dismissive comments about any evidene that contradicts your chemtrail religon - to be fair occasioally you show some signs that you may have actually examined the evidence - but then you sem to competely miss anythign factual with yuor subsequent...er......."analysis".

Such as this one - the whole point of the post is that it is at the south pole, where temperature and humidity are sometimes the same as at typical contrail altitudes that jets fly at.

But for you that was somehow an aspect that invalidates it??!! the whole point of the post invalidates the whole point of the post??

Now if it contradicted itself that's something else entirely...but it didn't....

Found anything wrong at contrail science yet?



posted on May, 11 2011 @ 09:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by dplum517
Too bad you can't measure persistence in a photograph or 20 second clip....


You can to some degree, by seeing the extent the contrail has already spread, and comparing it to how long, on average, a contrail takes to resemble that.

For example, in these two 1969 photos, some contrails are shown. In the first image they are already fairly old, probably at least 30 minutes. In the second photo they have spread out to cover the sky.



Source:
contrailscience.com...
edit on 11-5-2011 by Uncinus because: typo




top topics



 
6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join