It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TribeOfManyColours
Its out of my comfort zone to, check my personal video's
I have had no eduction. Could be that soon I blow up my home.
Originally posted by TribeOfManyColours
I know i have made threads in the past that where less interesting then this one. But it had at least way more comments on it. Its bin hours, and 2 different people commented since?.
Is it this topic? Am I one of the few that are exited about these things.?
What do you want? Shall I inhale HHO, see what happens? w8 going to make anther video
Working with HHO Gas is dangerous. HHO gas can be dangerous to inhale as well as highly explosive. Do not attempt to light HHO gas directly from the HHO generator. Do not attempt to store HHO gas. Do not install an HHO generator inside your vehicle or near heat sources. We assume that you are aware of all the risks and possible damages associated with HHO gas. If you are not, please educate yourself first.
How much energy does it take to grow the lemons? Sounds really efficient.
Someone. Could it be done.? Produce power via water cups and lemons for example??
Also known as "the neverending story". I think there was a movie by the same title.
Well actually, this thread is just for reaching us. Lets try and dedicate this thread in search of free energy.
Hydrolysis is not 100% efficient, meaning you need an additional power source to keep splitting the water.
And what if you for example build an HHO generator in your car and use an storage tank. So that on the end of the line, there's enough HHO to run the engine on full power
That guy is a swindler. Feel free to be swindled.
Interesting,
This is a hot topic, yet no one reply??
How can that be??
Is he right??
You can run an engine on straight water fairly easily though by introducing nebulized cold water mist with your HHO.
I know several guys running generators with Honda Vanguard engines this way. They use those little sonic misters from fog machines.
Originally posted by boncho
How much energy does it take to grow the lemons? Sounds really efficient.
Someone. Could it be done.? Produce power via water cups and lemons for example??
Also known as "the neverending story". I think there was a movie by the same title.
Well actually, this thread is just for reaching us. Lets try and dedicate this thread in search of free energy.
Hydrolysis is not 100% efficient, meaning you need an additional power source to keep splitting the water.
And what if you for example build an HHO generator in your car and use an storage tank. So that on the end of the line, there's enough HHO to run the engine on full power
That guy is a swindler. Feel free to be swindled.
Interesting,
This is a hot topic, yet no one reply??
How can that be??
Is he right??
You can run an engine on straight water fairly easily though by introducing nebulized cold water mist with your HHO.
When I spray water in a mist it is not flammable.... It is for you?
Or are you talking about hydrogen??? A gas! No misting needed....
I know several guys running generators with Honda Vanguard engines this way. They use those little sonic misters from fog machines.
Since when is fog flammable???
Is this thread meant for the jokes and puns forum?
Originally posted by xizd1
Nice thread. If someone could make a nice self-contained unit that is easy to install then it would be huge. If you used HHO for your car then what happens at inspection time? Do you have to dismantle it? Will it pass?
It's all time and money. If I have the time I don't have the money. If I have the money, I don't have the time.
There may be people who've never touched a wrench who don't know what they're talking about.
Originally posted by Binder
I know several guys running generators with Honda Vanguard engines this way. They use those little sonic misters from fog machines. They run pretty good this way,and no they won't rust out, or embrittle, or any of the other junk the know it alls that have never touched a wrench think will happen.
So he's not just saying they don't work, he's tested them!
I get mail. Hundreds of pieces of mail every month, and that includes e-mail, paper mail, the occasional voice mail and even a smattering of faxes. For the last two years, an unhealthy proportion of that correspondence has been about the same thing—making your car run on water instead of gasoline. With fuel escalating to historically high prices, followed by the global collapse of virtually every market, people are inclined to search for a way to reduce their monthly expenditures for gasoline or diesel. Which, of course, is perfectly understandable.
Over the years, I've tested plenty of gadgets that purport to reduce fuel consumption. None of them worked. None.
Now here's the type of testing you don't see from the backyard mechanic (by the way, I'm not disparaging backyard mechanics, I am one. I rebuilt my own engine):
I discussed the theoretical science a while ago. It's bad science. This malarkey boiled down to perpetual motion: something for nothing. Essentially, it takes more energy—in the form of the chemical energy in the gasoline you're burning in the engine, to spin the alternator to make the electricity and generate the HHO—than you get back. In fact, it's not even close: Multiply all the inefficiencies in that system and you only get a few percent back, certainly not in excess of 100 percent.
But hey if anyone has testing this thorough from any unbiased party (meaning NOT the folks profiting from selling these contraptions), I'd love to see it, so please post it.
we did some over-the-road and steady-state dynamometer testing to establish base-line fuel economy numbers. NBC followed my testing up with additional testing at an EPA-certified emissions lab, which wasn't cheap. The lab used its climate-controlled emissions dyno to establish fuel economy numbers in our Accord with the same protocols the EPA uses to generate the numbers on the window sticker of new cars. They're accurate and reproducible to well under 1 percent.
Then we took the car to a specialist who installed, for nearly $1900(!), a hydrogen generator and a system of other enhancements. There was a fuel heater, fuel-line magnets (which I debunked here), and several inscrutable boxes full of electronics designed to fool the car's computer into using less fuel. There was even a bottle of acetone to add to the fuel. (This is something that I've mentioned doesn't work here and here). The specialist guaranteed major improvements in fuel consumption. One week and nearly two grand later, the producer from NBC (who still hadn't identified himself as anyone except a guy who was tired of spending $50 to fill up his tank) picked up the car. He got a gas receipt proving the installer had seen 96 mpg, nearly triple the original economy.
We took the car straight back to that same EPA lab for another round of testing. It was followed shortly by a week's worth of road testing, dyno testing and general poking about to see what we could discover.
You can guess, right? The total improvement in fuel economy after $1800 plus of expenditure? Bupkis. Too small to measure. Nada. In fact, if you look at the EPA tests with the system switched on and then off, there's a tiny increase in fuel consumption when the system is turned on. I attribute this to the 15 amps or so of current the electrolysis cell consumes to produce hydrogen. That current uses horsepower to spin the generator, and that consumes gasoline. The hydrogen "boost" couldn't even compensate for its own losses.
You don't get the thread. Its meant to build, not break idea's. But your avatar holds a oil king or whatever he is/was, so you confess your colours. I don't mind
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
You don't get the thread. Its meant to build, not break idea's. But your avatar holds a oil king or whatever he is/was, so you confess your colours. I don't mind
You can't build anything from a flawed idea. There is nothing to this thread that has any chance of amounting to anything more than a waste of time.
And as another poster pointed out, Bob Lazar (of all people) actually had a good idea. Because he was talking about taking energy from solar rays to produce hydrogen. Which, if done in low population areas, can offset the amount of energy loss during hydrogen production (seeing that cities have less sunlight and more pollutants that block sunlight [smog]).
Talked about in this thread.
So, back to the drawing board?
A research team from ETH Zurich, PSI, and Caltech demonstrates the stable, efficient and rapid generation of solar fuels. They apply a thermochemical cycle based on ceria redox reactions to thermochemically split water and CO2 using a novel solar cavity-receiver reactor under concentrated solar radiation. Their remarkable findings are reported in the latest issue of Science.
Originally posted by TribeOfManyColours
Build this at home, to power the Hydrogen generator in the evening to fill up your HHO tanks??
edit on 5-5-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)