It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
reply to post by DuceizBack
I don't think a real feminist would argue the woman shouldn't get the same treatment by the penal system.
But you're absolutely right, the system is flawed at present to allow an unfair advantage to women in this particular instance.
When LEO comes to a domestic call they will pick up the man 99% of the time regardless of the complaint. This is because in reality men are stronger and more physically able than women. But this is an inequality that should be fixed. Women should suffer the same consequences for assault that men do.
In reality any man that gets beat up by a woman is a weenie. But that is neither here nor there...
Originally posted by Jinglelord
Okay I keep seeing people complaining that feminists are this evil group that is trying to destroy the planet and they hate all feminists.
Granted there are several extreme and vocal feminist groups that do hate men, but target them, don't target the ideal unless you really do believe women should be subservient and controlled by men as lesser creatures.
If you truly are not a feminist and you're a woman get off the computer and back into the kitchen, you're a hypocrite and shouldn't respond here. If you're a man and not a feminist than I will entertain your argument.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
My husband and I both call ourselves "feminists", but lately, I'm thinking a more accurate term would be "Equalist" or "Equality Advocate", because like Sherlock Homes, I believe in equality for all.
I think people who complain about feminists are actually complaining about man-haters, who are not feminists at all.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
When LEO comes to a domestic call they will pick up the man 99% of the time regardless of the complaint. This is because in reality men are stronger and more physically able than women.
Originally posted by hotbakedtater
Pretty broad, could you share some specific examples? Do you mean here on ATS or in real life?
Can you please tell us what the name of these feminist groups are, please? And what are we supposed to target them for?
Of course. Here we have the money shot, folks, and we can now conclude we have anther garden variety woman hater, or misogynist, here on ATS. A true feminist knows that to put labels on females is to deny them their full rights. What does being in the kitchen have to do with not being a feminist? As a feminist, I believe women have the right to be where ever they feel the need to be, kitchen or boardroom. Here we have the OP proclaiming that us kitchen dwelling stay at home housewives are not worthy to wear the label feminist.
Anytime we have this dynamic, we have someone bashing women, here it is under the guise of OP telling us what defines a feminist.
Thanks for the education this afternoon.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
A true feminist is not a man-hater. You're talking about man haters. Feminism is the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men. There's nothing about hating men in there.
Source
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I do believe there are many who use the flag of feminism to further their man-hating agendas. This doesn't make make feminism inherently bad.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
The distinction is as I alluded to in my OP. We would rarely go out and say we hate the baptists because they are out protesting soldier's funerals. We would in general qualify it as Westboro. I would expect the same consideration for feminism. I am all for railing against many claims by extremist feminist organizations and as usual the argument is primarily semantics.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
As an example the "Glass Ceiling" many women experience and many feminist groups fight against is in my opinion false. While any moron can easily see women in general make less money than men we need to examine root cause instead of making the assumption it is simply because business leaders dislike women. The root cause goes deeper from the feminist groups I've spoken to and worked with. There is consensus among the actual working feminists who aren't as vocal and aren't plastered in the media that women make less money because they are not as assertive in general as men. This is not as sensational as simply blaming business men, doesn't make a good headline, and doesn't feed into the victim culture the media is selling us. Do you hear about it? Nope.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I had it summed up for me by a woman well respected in international feminist circles: (paraphrased) "The work of the feminist movement making policy and law in the US is done, if they keep blaming others they will lose their gains, now it is the woman's responsibility to take advantage of the equality they were given."
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I watched this same woman lecture a group of feminist women for being stupid for not including men and working for equality. They were annoyed when I showed up working as her assistant instead of a woman. Apparently they let men join their group afterwards.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I do believe there are many who use the flag of feminism to further their man-hating agendas. This doesn't make make feminism inherently bad.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
The distinction is as I alluded to in my OP. We would rarely go out and say we hate the baptists because they are out protesting soldier's funerals. We would in general qualify it as Westboro. I would expect the same consideration for feminism. I am all for railing against many claims by extremist feminist organizations and as usual the argument is primarily semantics.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
As an example the "Glass Ceiling" many women experience and many feminist groups fight against is in my opinion false. While any moron can easily see women in general make less money than men we need to examine root cause instead of making the assumption it is simply because business leaders dislike women. The root cause goes deeper from the feminist groups I've spoken to and worked with. There is consensus among the actual working feminists who aren't as vocal and aren't plastered in the media that women make less money because they are not as assertive in general as men. This is not as sensational as simply blaming business men, doesn't make a good headline, and doesn't feed into the victim culture the media is selling us. Do you hear about it? Nope.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I had it summed up for me by a woman well respected in international feminist circles: (paraphrased) "The work of the feminist movement making policy and law in the US is done, if they keep blaming others they will lose their gains, now it is the woman's responsibility to take advantage of the equality they were given."
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I watched this same woman lecture a group of feminist women for being stupid for not including men and working for equality. They were annoyed when I showed up working as her assistant instead of a woman. Apparently they let men join their group afterwards.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
Finally; I do agree the name should be changed.
I would like to see a single group called "Equalists" And one could focus as a Gender Equalist or and Ethnic Equalist. But that just isn't as sensational and will never catch on.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
Okay I keep seeing people complaining that feminists are this evil group that is trying to destroy the planet and they hate all feminists.
Cheris Kramarae
"feminism is the radical notion that women are human beings."
Do you believe women should be able to vote? You're a feminist.
Do you believe men should get in trouble for abusing their wives? You're a feminist
Do you believe women should have the option to have a career and work? You're a feminist
Do you believe women should have a say in their lives? You ARE a feminist
We tend to forget quickly that women had no say in their lives for a long time being controlled by their fathers and husbands. Granted some women could rise above, but only if their men allowed it.
Saying all feminists hate men and are anti family is ridiculous. This would be like saying all Baptists are protesting soldier's funerals.
Granted there are several extreme and vocal feminist groups that do hate men, but target them, don't target the ideal unless you really do believe women should be subservient and controlled by men as lesser creatures.
Again I will say that I recognize this wasn't how it always was, but any man that chose who got a father's cooperation could completely control any woman's life in the past.
If you truly are not a feminist and you're a woman get off the computer and back into the kitchen, you're a hypocrite and shouldn't respond here. If you're a man and not a feminist than I will entertain your argument.
This is much shorter than planned because I am going fast due to hitting enter rather than tab too early....edit on 1-5-2011 by Jinglelord because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Expat888
The silly things westerners come up with to argue over... amazing...
*shakes head and walks out of post*
Originally posted by Jinglelord
Wow I suppose there is no doubting your opinion at least.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I simply don't see a group attempting to rectify an inequality for a group of people as seeking to dominate. Granted there will always be overtones and factions in said group which do seek superiority. A quick peek at NOW's (National Organization for Women) will reveal a lot of good and some distinctly suspicious.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
Now I am all for women's rights and equality, and would have no problem aligning myself with a feminist group that is working towards gender equality. I did study the anthropology of Gender in depth in college and belonged to groups that were interested in it. I was specifically asked to attend by the faculty advisor for these "Women's" clubs as it was her belief that equality can't happen with separation. (Separate but equal is a myth).
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I met quite a bit of resistance and really got into heated debates. Back in those days I was better equipped for this as the knowledge was fresher in my head. Hell they even tried to elect me as president of a club specifically designed to teach leadership skills to women. I had to decline but did get the focus of the club changed to be Gender neutral and thus no longer sexist.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
In my mind feminism is the ideal that women are equal to men.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
And I would happily associate with any group that wishes to further this. In turn I wouldn't become opposed to being deeply involved in a group that was trying to push a severe feminist agenda. From within you can effect change and help the group to obtain it's moderate goals which are good and keep suppressed the extreme goals which will cause the group to fail and the moderate gains lost.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
I don't want to live in a world with weak subservient women. I can't be dominated and am myself very dominant and need a partner who is strong enough to be independent and keep me from dominating.
Originally posted by Jinglelord
If I wanted the BDSM lifestyle I am really good at making floggers and leather restraints they would be glad to have me...
Originally posted by Expat888
The silly things westerners come up with to argue over... amazing...
*shakes head and walks out of post*