It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Also OP a further question would be: How would the relatively recent invention of the "corporate person" be affected by the 13th and 14th Amendments? That is to say, do I as a human, benefit by adhering to some corporate person and becoming a resource of that person? It would appear that if the Amendments do not apply to the corporate personage of peoples, but applies only to control the human resource, then I guess it makes sense to become a worker. So I guess working enough in America might qualify as 'naturalization', so long as the work was slave-like enough, according to the compromise of the 13th and 14th amendments.
Originally posted by Cuervo
The stipulation is ridiculous to begin with. Why not just go all the way and only allow people of Native American ancestry be president?
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Originally posted by Cuervo
The stipulation is ridiculous to begin with. Why not just go all the way and only allow people of Native American ancestry be president?
Your oversimplification and laughing smiley, suggest that you aren't too smart.
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
Originally posted by Cuervo
Your accusation and name calling, suggest that you are a jerk.
I don't know why you think I was saying something negative towards my indigenous ancestors but I think you clearly missed my point. I think that the fact that there is any stipulation of being president based on where you were physically born is totally absurd. So absurd that they may as well keep narrowing it down to only include Native Americans. It was an illustration to show how ridiculous it is to begin with. How you read into it further than that, I have no clue.
Originally posted by Cuervo
reply to post by smallpeeps
You are a different cat, that's for sure. I guess I just haven't encountered your brand of provocation. I'll just chalk it up to a misreading.
As to "If you have some natural voew of the world, or some politic to add, then do so." Well, I did. And you called me stupid. You know that emoticons do not equate to IQ, right?
ps edit - No offense taken, by the way.edit on 30-4-2011 by Cuervo because: We all just need to lighten up.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Naturalized Citizen is someone who was born in another country or territory foriegn to the United States who is a cuurrent resident swearing allegiance to The United States from that point in time until death via oath and affirmation upon citizenship ceremony.
I am not a lawyer just know a whole lot about a whole lot.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
You left out the part where the parents have to be US citizens. Convenient. Obama Sr was never a US citizen. In fact, many lib pro BO use your definition and call it Native Born.edit on 1-5-2011 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)