It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bargoose
reply to post by NyxOne
If the planets qualities were such that it absorbed EVERYTHING from the visible spectrum, the human eye would NOT detect it.
.... if it were a black hole on the other hand, then it would be invisible because light would be absorbed....
Black Holes in Binary Star Systems
It is thought that in some binary systems one of the stars is a black hole. Although the black hole cannot be seen directly, it can signal its presence if matter accretes from the other star into the black hole. The matter falling into the black hole is likely to form an accretion disk.
As the matter in the accretion disk loses energy and spirals downward into the black hole it is heated to very high temperatures and emits X-rays. Generally, any binary star system in which there is a strong X-ray source and in which one of the stars is not seen but is very massive is a good candidate for a black hole.
Originally posted by AlexIR
Ok so i made this thread to try to explain to some people that the planet mentioned in the title does not exist.
First of all i want to mention that Nibiru is suposedly a planet bigger than Jupiter that with its gravitational pull managed to get Pluto on the outer reaches of the Solar System. Now i ask you, if you can see Jupiter in the night sky easily (if you know where to look) don't you think that something bigger would have caught someone's attention?
And now i know there will be comments like "Its comming from the Sun so you can't see it" .... Well thats just an excuse that some have come up with but anyway i ask you again, where was Earth 6 months ago?
On the other side of the sun, so you could have seen it then but just a bit dimmer than now.
I also saw a clip from SOHO that suposedly caught nibiru passing in front of the Sun ...... right .... does this even need an explanation... guess not...
Now in conclusion i also want to mention that this planet was suposedly discovered by Sitchin on some ancient Sumerian tablets that he managed to translate because he was so good at it and he was a pro in translating ancient texts that others have difficulty translating today.
Now after reading all that i ask you, do you still believe this planet exists?
Originally posted by ConcreteAngel1
Originally posted by AlexIR
Ok so i made this thread to try to explain to some people that the planet mentioned in the title does not exist.
First of all i want to mention that Nibiru is suposedly a planet bigger than Jupiter that with its gravitational pull managed to get Pluto on the outer reaches of the Solar System. Now i ask you, if you can see Jupiter in the night sky easily (if you know where to look) don't you think that something bigger would have caught someone's attention?
And now i know there will be comments like "Its comming from the Sun so you can't see it" .... Well thats just an excuse that some have come up with but anyway i ask you again, where was Earth 6 months ago?
On the other side of the sun, so you could have seen it then but just a bit dimmer than now.
I also saw a clip from SOHO that suposedly caught nibiru passing in front of the Sun ...... right .... does this even need an explanation... guess not...
Now in conclusion i also want to mention that this planet was suposedly discovered by Sitchin on some ancient Sumerian tablets that he managed to translate because he was so good at it and he was a pro in translating ancient texts that others have difficulty translating today.
Now after reading all that i ask you, do you still believe this planet exists?
Nibiru wouldn't be easy to see as it can only be seen in infared.
Yes, we were in a different position 6 months ago, but like I said, it can't easily be seen regardless and if its constantly moving along, maybe it was always behind the sun compared to where we were.
I would love to hear your explanation about why you think that isn't Nibiru on SOHO.
I'm not saying I completely believe Nibiru exists, but I'm not ruling out either.edit on 22-4-2011 by ConcreteAngel1 because: (no reason given)
And saying "you'd only sea it in infra red because it emits no light" is obviously nonsense too given that asteroids don't emit any own light either....
Originally posted by Adurna
reply to post by AlexIR
The one main theory I have heard about Nibiru is that it is constantly on the other side of the sun so we haven't seen it. I'm not sure how they then found about the planet, but thats the governments for you. They say that when the earths poles shift we will go backwards and hit Nibiru. Thats the most sensible theory I have heard but like everything else it requires doubt unless we have absolute proof.
Originally posted by sitchin
if it does exist ,its not due to arrive for at least another 40 years or so ..sitchin has never claimed that planet x had any thing to do with 2012 date ..sitchin interpreted Sumerian tablets and based his finding off them and nothing else
not true..they new a lot more above the stars and planets than we did,and we are only now confirming what they claimed was true "thousands" of years ago..there is enough sources out there apart from sitchin,s work to back up these claims ..but spoon feed you i wont..
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by sitchin
if it does exist ,its not due to arrive for at least another 40 years or so ..sitchin has never claimed that planet x had any thing to do with 2012 date ..sitchin interpreted Sumerian tablets and based his finding off them and nothing else
Yet there's still no objective proof backing up his claims
The Sumerian tablets don't represent facts, they only prove what people BELIEVED to be true back then. Clearly they didn't have the scientific knowledge we have today, so it's understandable that not everything "matches up".
we have only rediscovered a few planets in the last 70 years or so ..with the aid of telescopes ..now i'm assuming that the Sumerian's didn't have such things back then..so the only logical insight on that is that they obtained the knowledge from other sources ..like i said we are still playing catch up
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by sitchin
Oh really, they knew more than us today? Funny, considering they believed there were 7 earths and 7 heavens in total
Look, I'm not saying they weren't advanced. They had basic star charts (emphasis on basic), but claiming they knew just as much or more as scientists today is silly. They didn't know about sooooooooooo much we know today...