It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zorgon
His only concern is to keep anyone away from anything that might prove that the accepted story may not be the real story... Evil? Perhaps not... Shady? Most certainly
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by zorgon
His only concern is to keep anyone away from anything that might prove that the accepted story may not be the real story... Evil? Perhaps not... Shady? Most certainly
With respect, I think you are exceedingly wrong on this count. Hawass may be a showman, and may not appear particularly sophisticated by our jaded Western standards, but his major contribution has been to protect the integrity of Egypt's cultural heritage and to keep its resources under that country's care and control.
The world is full of Western museums and university who consider ancient antiquities to be theirs by virtue of academe, entitlement or basic colonialism. That just ain't so. Look at the Elgin Marbles, and Greece's efforts to repatriate them as an example. This is all part of a larger argument, and I applaud Hawass for being the gatekeeper. He may drive people nuts...but he is standing up for the rights of the Egyptian people. Perhaps that presents a risk due to the corruption of others...but who are we to march in and assume control? We are supposed to have left our colonial 'white man's burden' behind us.
Originally posted by zorgon
His only concern is to keep anyone away from anything that might prove that the accepted story may not be the real story... Evil? Perhaps not... Shady? Most certainly
Remember all that fuss about the caves under Giza? The ones he wouldn't admit to or let anyone look?
uh huh "they don't exist..."
Originally posted by TheMistaMan
reply to post by zuul000
This has gotta be a joke right? Zahi Hawass is a living legend. Are there any other news articles to corroborate this? It seems so ... bizarre.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
He may drive people nuts...but he is standing up for the rights of the Egyptian people. Perhaps that presents a risk due to the corruption of others...but who are we to march in and assume control? We are supposed to have left our colonial 'white man's burden' behind us.
A little more research may be in order . You won't see it in tourist pictures but the sphynxs and the pyramids are ringed in fencing . There used to be a couple of hundred tour operators who would take tourists in , often on camel caravans . An operator could have 30 employees to offer full service . Hawass put an end to it only granting personal tour operator permits to hand picked tour operators who could and would kick back substantial money to him . When the revolt came over 1,000 people , operators and employees went to the army and demanded that Hawass be arrested for corruption . Under Hawasses permit system , non-permitted tour operators could only take tourists to the fences , unless they got a Hawass permit and paid him off . There are many archaeology students and graduate archaeologists in Egypt , unemployed because Hawass only hired the sons of those connected to him or Mubarak , many totally unqualified to sweep floors while those qualified and educated but without a connection to Hawass or Mubarak went unemployed . Many of them went to the army also requesting that Hawass be gone . Hawass was and is corrupt to the core and National Geographic couldn't even shoot 1 minute of video unless Hawass was the star and stars are well compensated . Egyptology was his ticket to ride , his meal ticket and in Egypt he was the guy who had to be paid . The only difference between him and the other fake , Bear Grills is that Hawass wouldn't jump off a pyramid . He'd take the cash and shove someone else off .
Originally posted by alfa1
Funny that there isnt more news on this.
Its (as I type) now 7:35pm in Egypt, so one would think that if something had happened during the day to a very well known internationally famous person there'd be lots of stories about it.
The only reference I can find is the one you linked to. Nothing else.
Nothing on aljazeera.
(...)
The sentence will be suspended until the appeal ruling.
Sunday's sentence against Hawass -- known internationally as a leading Egyptologist -- came after a suit was filed against him in a land dispute while he was still the country's antiquities supremo.
In the ruling, Hawass was ordered to return the land to the plaintiff, but he allegedly refused to do so.
Hawass was sentenced to a year in prison, a fine of 10,000 Egyptian pounds (more than $1,600) in damages plus interest, and to be removed from his post.
(...)
I have to tell the world right now, there is a story going around that I am going to be in jail, which is a complete misunderstanding.
Last year, we were taking bids from different companies to run a book store inside the Egyptian Museum. There is a person, who was renting a bookstore inside the Museum. He wanted to stop the bidding process, because he thought he should keep his contract. This person filed a case with the Misdemeanor Court in Agouza, Cairo, in order to stop the bidding process. This case was filed against the Secretary General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA), not against me personally, but against the role I was holding at that time.
However, before the case came to trial, the bidding process ended at the end of May 2010, and the Supreme Council of Antiquities (now the Ministry of State for Antiquities) chose a company, the Egyptian Sound and Light Company, to run the bookstore. Shortly after this decision was made, the court trial happened, at the beginning of June, so the SCA representatives did not have time to present evidence that the bidding had finished. Therefore, the court made a ruling that the bidding should stop. However, it was too late to do anything.
He still wanted to get his way, so this person continued to bring action against me in the court. In November 2010, the court made a ruling, that I was innocent, because as the Secretary General of the SCA, I was not in charge of legal affairs at the SCA, this was under the control of the Ministry of Culture at that time. But this was not enough for this person, he brought the case to the court again, claiming he had evidence that I was in fact in charge of legal affairs, and this time, the SCA did not have a legal representative present at the court. The court made the current ruling that I, as head of the SCA, was sentenced to a year in jail. This is how the court in Egypt works, and this is not an uncommon thing that the head of an organization gets sentenced like this. When a ruling like this is made, the defendant (in this case myself as Secretary General of the SCA at that time) has a certain amount of time to appeal the decision of the court.
Tomorrow, the head of the Legal Affairs Department at the Ministry of Antiquities will go to the court to file our appeal. He will present evidence that the bid for the bookstore contract was finished before the original court ruling, so therefore we could not follow the ruling to stop the bidding. We already had completed the bidding! I have every confidence that this matter will be cleared up very soon, so I want to tell everyone not to worry. I respect the laws of my country very highly, and the rulings of our courts. I intend to handle this matter entirely within our legal system. Nothing will cause me to lose focus from my goal of protecting the sites of Egypt.
and signing an agreement with an American association that threatened the national security of Egypt by allowing the association to conduct studies on certain ancient Egyptian kings.
Originally posted by Julie Washington
Here's Hawass's Response:
Explanation of the Court Trial Against Me
Originally posted by bandito
A little more research may be in order .
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Varemia
Am I the only one who looks up to Hawass and sees him as a good guy just trying to do the best he can with what he has?
Most likely, yes
I mean, he has been basically charged with protecting every artifact and temple, and overseeing every single thing that goes on to make sure that history isn't being destroyed or altered.
If he was so concerned about protecting, he would not have resigned as soon as the going got tough. That act alone proved he was in it for himself
Remember all that fuss about the caves under Giza? The ones he wouldn't admit to or let anyone look?
uh huh "they don't exist..."
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
Well, actually he didn't quit as soon as the going got tough... it was a bit afterward...