It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kinda kurious
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Wow, just wow. Did anyone ACTUALLY read the ENTIRE article? From linked article in OP:
In fact, it had happened on Apollo 12, that 55 minutes before liftoff, part of their procedure was to test-fire the thrusters on the lunar module," he said."That's basically a pretty big rocket engine — just above where the flag is located — and when they did that, it blew over the antenna that was communicating with the Earth and it rotated the flag about 120 degrees."
The author of the book satisfied his own concerns. Talk about "cherry picking." Geez.
BTW, I'm a FORMER moon hoax believer. Let's strive to Deny Ignorance shall we? Or at the very least, read the article before posting fantastic claims. :shk:
edit on 3-4-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)
That's basically a pretty big rocket engine — just above where the flag is located — and when they did that, it blew over the antenna that was communicating with the Earth and it rotated the flag about 120 degrees."
Originally posted by grizzle2
You don't need a coronal mass ejection for it to be deadly.
If these space suits are resistant to this type of radiation, why didn't they send some to Chernobyl for the cleanup workers to wear, or to Fukushima? In fact, the head of the British division of Nexus magazine contacted the manufacturer of the space suits and asked just that question, about their possible use in radiation cleanup. He was told that it would not be advisable, and that the suits offered no protection against radiation.
"A lot of people think about the Apollo astronauts, and that they didn't have much protection and were fine," Lane told SPACE.com. "But in Apollo, it was a very short mission and a lot of it was basically luck. I'm not sure how they managed to be so lucky, but I don't think you can count on luck on short missions for the future or trips to the planets."
Originally posted by knowneedtoknow
moon landing was fakeedit on 4-4-2011 by knowneedtoknow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by stirling
Does anyone think its possible that both camps are correct?
The Apollo progam may have sent the first one, and because of what was discovered (ie pissed off aliens) they faked the rest so they never went back.......
It seems to be a pretty compellig C on that rock.Not just some random hair, but a printed regular C that has symetry.
What its doing on a moon rock is anyones guess......Im ambivalent...
But the concept of there being perhaps one or two rteal, and the rest faked trips is a more likely possibility than no real journey at all.
What if they found ruins on the moon the first trip?
Then had to create a sterile moon landing to keep this secret hidden.....???
Its not my pet theory but it accounts for conflicting evidence and lots of confusion because researchers dont have a clue whih trip was real, and which was faked....
Originally posted by cushycrux
The "C" was for sure an eyelash.
Originally posted by Mister_Bit
Actually, looking at the "C" picture again, isn't that a footprint in the lower right corner? Now scale that "eyelash" to the scale of the footprint....
That's somekind of massive eyelash!
Originally posted by FutureThinker
Did anybody read the story at the OPs link, From what I read, Godwin says he has explanations for the anomolies in the Moon Landings. ...
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Wow, just wow. Did anyone ACTUALLY read the ENTIRE article? From linked article in OP:
In fact, it had happened on Apollo 12, that 55 minutes before liftoff, part of their procedure was to test-fire the thrusters on the lunar module," he said."That's basically a pretty big rocket engine — just above where the flag is located — and when they did that, it blew over the antenna that was communicating with the Earth and it rotated the flag about 120 degrees."
The author of the book satisfied his own concerns.
Originally posted by cushycrux
Originally posted by Mister_Bit
Actually, looking at the "C" picture again, isn't that a footprint in the lower right corner? Now scale that "eyelash" to the scale of the footprint....
That's somekind of massive eyelash!
OHHH MAN! IT IS ON THE FILM NOT ON THE STONE!edit on 4-4-2011 by cushycrux because: (no reason given)