Radiation level at 94 currently in Denver at 8:54 PM!

page: 8
23
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 07:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Avardan
 


The thing is this, isn't Denver where the high ranking government folks are supposed to be evacuated TO instead of From?

I took a night off from looking at the radiation maps. Thank you guys for staying on top of it.

So, does anyone else find it confusing why the levels would be spiking at night instead of during the daytime when solar radiation is hitting Denver?




posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 08:42 AM
link   
Readings that are high now. Monitor Information:

Fixed Monitor Location: NE: KEARNEY
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/31/2011 12:19:27 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/31/2011 01:19:34 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 167
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2764
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1798
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 488
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 304
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 167
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 212
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 127
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 43
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 43

onitor Information:

Fixed Monitor Location: TX: FT. WORTH
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/31/2011 11:21:51 a.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/31/2011 12:21:59 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2466
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1507
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 380
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 242
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 116
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 143
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 89
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 33
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 37

Monitor Information:

Fixed Monitor Location: TX: AUSTIN
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/31/2011 11:21:51 a.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/31/2011 12:21:59 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 191
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2466
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1507
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 380
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 242
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 116
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 143
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 89
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 33
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 37



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 08:43 AM
link   
Monitor Information:

Fixed Monitor Location: AZ: PHOENIX
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/31/2011 12:00:17 p.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/31/2011 01:00:25 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 136
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 2536
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1597
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 553
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 278
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 189
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 227
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 138
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 41
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 50



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 08:44 AM
link   
onitor Information:

Fixed Monitor Location: CO: GRAND JUNCTION
Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/31/2011 11:51:53 a.m.
Measurement End Date/Time: 03/31/2011 12:52:01 p.m.
Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 141
Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 3104
Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 2063
Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 583
Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 322
Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 186
Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 223
Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 141
Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 53
Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 58



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 08:50 AM
link   
In addition to the readings, we should also start correlating whether there was any precipitation at the time of the higher readings.

STAY OUT OF THE RAIN!

During Chernobyl, I happened to live in a portion of Western Europe with the highest readings. Then there was an absolute connection to the rain water. I remember news casts with reporters using Geiger counters at storm drains going nuts.

I'm willing to bet the same will be true now.
edit on 31-3-2011 by loam because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 09:17 AM
link   
So let's keep tabs on the weather with the readings.

Seriously, we CAN'T be the only ones doing this, can we?



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 10:06 AM
link   
reply to post by YourPopRock
 


just thought i would share this....you guys are definatly reading everything correctly....look at this spike from some ground monitors

cmdl1.cmdl.noaa.gov:8000...



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 10:54 AM
link   
Good catch!

So we aren't off of our rockers.

Here is the mystery then... why is the Radiation spiking at night when the sun is down?


This, my fellow ATS'ers is what we need to work on!



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 12:41 PM
link   
Since several people have chimed in from Colorado, you might be interested in the Self Reliance Expo I posted about that will be in Denver in April.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 03:09 PM
link   
That eexpo looks like something worth attending. Great find!

(PS, 2:08 pm Denver time, radiation level 78)



posted on Mar, 31 2011 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by DelMar
 


Appreciate the info



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 02:16 PM
link   
Denver was at 125 last night at 11:02 pm 3/31/11 .
I have a screenshot of it, I just have to figure out how to add a screenshot here. Any advice?



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 02:25 PM
link   
reply to post by RoyalBlue
 


At the top when you click reply there are little squares one of the says image click that



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 02:29 PM
link   
If you look at this model of Denver, radiation levels were higher before the Japan quake.

www.epa.gov...

and way way higher in Colorado Springs before Japan after the quake it's lower

www.epa.gov...

To-date, levels recorded at this monitor have been thousands of times below any conservative level of concern.

but keep freaking out it's fun to watch

edit on 1-4-2011 by mileslong54 because: (no reason given)
edit on 1-4-2011 by mileslong54 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by mileslong54
 

No I'm freaking out, because of the Japan tragedy, I am just learning about the high readings around our own country that the gov't, industry, etc. assures us is well below safe levels. I'm having a "little" trust issue with that....



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   
reply to post by mileslong54
 


I noticed that too but don't you think thats alittle odd? These graphs show them higher when we didn't know about it and way lower now that way are looking for it. I think they are screwing with them on purpous to show us "were better now" instead of the truth wich is we are way worse.



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by RoyalBlue
reply to post by mileslong54
 

No I'm freaking out, because of the Japan tragedy, I am just learning about the high readings around our own country that the gov't, industry, etc. assures us is well below safe levels. I'm having a "little" trust issue with that....


Your getting more radiation sitting in front of your computer and talking on your phone

Type of Radiation
Field Strength

ELF radiation from computers
3-6 milligauss

Microwave from wi-fi devices
100-200 µW/m2

www.emwatch.com...
edit on 1-4-2011 by mileslong54 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 03:01 PM
link   
reply to post by badgerman24
 

That is worrisome in and of itself. I felt like from the beginning of the Japan disaster that our own nuclear industry would start trying to sweep everything we might see, now that the world is looking for it, "under their rug", or blame any odd readings on Japan...



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 03:03 PM
link   
reply to post by mileslong54
 


But there is a difference between radiation, and radioactive contamination, right?



posted on Apr, 1 2011 @ 03:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by badgerman24
reply to post by mileslong54
 


I noticed that too but don't you think thats alittle odd? These graphs show them higher when we didn't know about it and way lower now that way are looking for it. I think they are screwing with them on purpous to show us "were better now" instead of the truth wich is we are way worse.


There were solar flares from the sun that could have sent us more radiation, before the Japan quake, that could have caused the spike before the quakes. I remember a lot of talk about it on here a month ago but I don't know for sure.





top topics
 
23
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join


Haters, Bigots, Partisan Trolls, Propaganda Hacks, Racists, and LOL-tards: Time To Move On.
read more: Community Announcement re: Decorum