It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
President Barack Obama has said the US will transfer its leading role on Libya "within days" to ensure the burden of enforcing a UN resolution against Colonel Muammar Gaddafi is shared. He said Nato would play a co-ordinating role but differences remain within the organisation, with France and Turkey opposed to Nato taking the lead.
"We will be one of the partners among many," Mr Obama said. "Obviously, the situation is evolving on the ground, and how quickly this transfer takes place will be determined by the recommendation of our commanding officers that the first phase of the mission has been completed," he said.
Mr Obama pointed to past events when the US had acted "unilaterally and without full international support" and had "ended up bearing the full burden".
He said Nato would play a co-ordinating function but he said he would leave it to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm Mike Mullen, to describe later how the transfer would take place.
In Russia, visiting US Defence Secretary Robert Gates also said the US would soon reduce its participation in the coalition operation. But after a meeting in Brussels, Nato appeared not to have resolved differences over how to proceed.
Mr Obama pointed to past events when the US had acted "unilaterally and without full international support" and had "ended up bearing the full burden".
Originally posted by Jepic
Germany and Turkey are against the bombing raids taking place.
Anyway, this just makes me angry. What burden are they talking about? After three nights of bombings with Tomahawks and B-2s, now Obummer wants to get rid of the burden...edit on 21-3-2011 by Jepic because: (no reason given)edit on 21-3-2011 by Jepic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by Nephalim
Obama is talking about Iraq? No, he is talking about Libya. The article makes that quite clear.
What I would like to know is why would NATO have anything to do with Libya?
Mr Obama pointed to past events when the US had acted "unilaterally and without full international support" and had "ended up bearing the full burden".