It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Janky Red
And, do we need some type of basic skills test before issuing a voter registration? I have always been a fan of retesting drivers every 6-9 years before allowing them to renew their driver's licenses. This would eliminate a lot of the threat of old folks on the roads, and keep everyone in-tuned to new traffic laws. Kind of a CE requirement like most other licenses have.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Reply to post by TKDRL
NH has no durational residency requirement.
I could load a bus with massholes and send them up to NH and have they vote for Kerry as NH residents the same day then drive them home to MA to vote again.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by Throwback
Only there isn't any evidence of widespread voter fraud like this in NH or any other states.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Janky Red
Good point! If they can participate in the wars drummed up by politicians, then they should at least have the right to vote on those politicians. And I agree about the senility thing, You should have lived in Florida in 2000! Everyone wanted to ban the senile old voters after that fiasco!
So, maybe we raise the age of military service and voting to 21? Or do we lower the age to drink to 18?
And, do we need some type of basic skills test before issuing a voter registration? I have always been a fan of retesting drivers every 6-9 years before allowing them to renew their driver's licenses. This would eliminate a lot of the threat of old folks on the roads, and keep everyone in-tuned to new traffic laws. Kind of a CE requirement like most other licenses have.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Janky Red
I agree, that's exactly why the GOP is doing it.
But it doesn't change the fact that a non-resident of a state should have no right to vote in that state.
I don't agree with lowering or raising the voting age (it should be 18 and remain there) or changing same-day registration .. but I simply don't see logically why an out-of-state college student should be allowed to vote on local issues. Federal, no problem, and absentee for their home cities/states .. why not? But not local for where they attend school --- unless they establish residency.
Dems are trying to protect their investment in college students.
GOP is trying to cut the competition.
I'm just trying to cut through the BS.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Maybe we Should take away the old people vote due to potential senilityedit on 8-3-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Side note: I noticed the theme in this thread against college students getting to vote seems to be set in the idea that college students only spend a matter of months in any given location. Not too many 4 + year degree holders I am guessing?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Sinnthia
So Ill stay here in NH, get a PO Box in Jersey and vote in Jersey. You dont see anything wrong with that?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Sinnthia
ETA:
HAHA Nevermind I misread.
Anyway, yes, you may be spending time at your school but you dont live there.
You dont have any stake in how that areas is run. Any changes that you may be voting for or against wouldnt affect that area for years anyway.
Personally, while in school living back and forth with no real home you are transient and really shouldnt be voting in anything but federal elections.
At least I didnt. I made a conscious decision that I wasnt from that area I went to school in and had no business pretending to know the place the people or their issues.
It would have been self-righteous and presumptive of me to even attempt to vote there among those people. If anything I still had a stake and an understanding of the place where I grew up and could have justified voting there but I still didnt because I didnt know where I was going to end up, I even lived there and worked there year round for 6 years but I knew I was leaving that city and that state eventually and had no business interfering with it.edit on 10-3-2011 by thisguyrighthere because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
reply to post by Sinnthia
If you live, pay taxes and then get to vote in your college town that's fine. If you then file for an absentee ballot for your home state as well then that is when a problem arises. That is happening in this country and it isn't just college students either. This was first done in the 60's and worked very well on college compasses. It has continued and no one has ever been prosecuted for it. Go to some college hangouts immediately before and on the night of an election and listen to the conversations. "Snow Birds" have done this for years in both local and Federal elections!
The only way to get anywhere near a fair election anymore is what some states have resorted to and that's Voter ID's! They then should be correlated to what your home state is according to IRS records. That would be a hurdle for the federal government to vote on! Otherwise all elections are suspect!