It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Where are the passengers at then?
Originally posted by Caji316
i can't remember reading of any body's found at the White House or the other plane that was shot down...
Originally posted by Humint1
There are many people who are simply muddling through this entire 911 conpsiracy theory regarding the Pentagon without touching upon a simple aspect of this 911 incident. Where are the passengers at then? If they were supposed to have been on the airliner and now many claim the building was actually struck using some type of speculated missile then why haven't the familys of these passengers stepped forward and asked the ultimate question that would without any doubt at all, back up the missile theory?
Where is my loved one at?
Perhaps its because they were on the airliner all along and until anyone on this forum or anywhere else can show evidence that they were either kidnapped and taken away to Area 51 or maybe Wright Patterson Air Field, then there can be no "missile conspiracy theory" regarding the Pentagon. Without people being able to show that the passengers were elsewhere when the Pentagon was struck the conspiracy theorys actually debunk theirselves as no one on here or elsewhere will even touch upon the subject of "where are the passengers then if was a missile?". While I have seen in some threads where people actually have the ignorance to post "the passengers aren't the subject" or "the passengers are not the issue here" really demonstrates what the website's motto refers to - Deny Ignorance.
The myriad of theorys about the Pentagon are really convincing until one gets to the one very imposing question which has already been asked about the passengers, but it goes a little deeper than that. Those individuals who have made 911 a career are the real spoon toters in the big pot here. There are countless theorys and opinions posted relating to this subject that are based in paypersons terminology and language that is geared towards the emotional side of this issue. It actually gets people questioning the events of 911 but in the form of a less than well thought out series of questions. One in particular is "how did the nose of an airliner make the punchout hole?" and yes, we all know the nose of any airliner couldn't do that. But here is a simple yet realistic answer that MIGHT BE the answer to that question - It was made due to all of the debris being pushed in that direction. Now, that answer is not posted here to incite a rash of replys in the form of "so you think it was....?", again that answer is based in reality instead of unfounded speculative theory which is more plausible that having to go back and prove where the phantom missile came from, who stole it, who launched it, where did it launch from etc etc. The more realistic answer is more than likely the ones many need to be understanding and looking at instead of these ignorant based theorys that shine in the middle at their high point but are very dim around the edges because they are all bark and no bite. In other words, they appear to make sense on the outside until you take them apart and look inside.
There are thousands of aspects about 911 that do not make sense. A good question would be did the terrorists intend for this even to actually make sense in the first place? The only thing they wanted was to hi jack some airplanes and do some damage. yet we have all of these armchair terrorists experts stating that they know what happened didn't really happen. I say, OK then what really did happene then? Lay it out then, not with a speculative theory based in some half assed theory concocted while watching Loose Change, but tell us the real deal. From inception to conclusion. I'm sick of these retarded missile theorys being claimed as faux-fact when the government can't even 100% for sure tell us what went on!
As for the missile theory, my opinion is that missiles can't be fired without a small group of people especially a Global Hawk or other modern missile. Another specific problem in my opinion is that where are all of the whistleblowers at if this was the big "inside job" as some walk around and say it is then? Oh yea, we all know the government is so compartmentalized it would be easy according to Jesse Ventura and a few other hambones who have made money of of 911. The only problem with that issue is that no one in government, I don't care what yourr title is or your rank is, can keep a secret that big for 10 years without peddling the story out using some "pen name" like "Dalton Fury", ex Major of 1st SFOD did in his book. One does not write a book in order to cleanse their souls because they missed the big buck on opening day. They do however write a book for profit however. If this had been the big "inside job" some fools say it was, we'd be reading about it already in paperback.edit on 3/1/2011 by Humint1 because: Spelling check
These passengers did not exist.
Originally posted by Humint1
If one is going around posting a theory that consists of following;
"The pentagon was not hit by an airliner but by a missile".
Then the question begs to be answered of, then what happened to the passengers then?