It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Nor can they explain what keeps the planets in thier rotations.
Originally posted by PieKeeper
Originally posted by hawkiye
Nor can they explain what keeps the planets in thier rotations.
This is where the conversation ends.
There's no point in trying to explain anything to you if you don't even have a fundamental understanding of accepted science.
Originally posted by hawkiye
I know science thinks they understand how the planets are kept in thier rotations however it is just a theory, they cannot prove it.
Originally posted by hawkiye
This type of thinking has actually held science back or it would be much further along then it is
Science deals with the physical; what is able to be measured, tested, and observed. This is the only way we can actually learn about our reality and then apply that knowledge effectively.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Exactly which is why it is so absurd for science to pretend to understand the non-physical such as an out of body experience.
Originally posted by hawkiye
I am also wondering what equipment was used to measure the gravity that keeps the planets in thier rotations...
Please, stop with the gravity. You're only discrediting yourself and derailing the topic by waving around your misunderstanding of basic physics.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Quantum physics is currently questioning the so called "laws of physics" you seem so attached to.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Nice dodge since you can't answer the question. It must be really difficult for you to know that science does not know and understand everything you think it does. The fact is science has no way to measure the gravitational fields of each planet in relation to each other and the sun etc. So it remains an unproven theory.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by PieKeeper
Originally posted by hawkiye
Nor can they explain what keeps the planets in thier rotations.
This is where the conversation ends.
There's no point in trying to explain anything to you if you don't even have a fundamental understanding of accepted science.
Key words are "accepted science" I know science thinks they understand how the planets are kept in thier rotations however it is just a theory, they cannot prove it. Just because something is accepted does not make it true. This type of thinking has actually held science back or it would be much further along then it is. So yeah I would say this is a good point to end the conversation
Originally posted by kaleshchand
reply to post by LeoVirgo
This is exactly the type of data verification that is needed to prove OBEs either way. The ability to physically see/ hear/ etc what is impossible to do so from the current location of the physical presence. This is what scientists should be trying to do, not this stupid prop show.
Theoretical Quantum Physics is a roomfull of idiots who haven't realized that particle-centric physics has always been a blind alley, and haven't the humility to be able to admit that they've finally run into the back wall with nowhere left to run.
But go ahead and huff on that bowl all you want. No one will ever be affected by what you believe or disbelieve. Maybe your kids, but they won't ever make a difference in the world either. So have at your fantasy world. It's all the thrills that are left to you anyway.
Yes science is biased, to reality, sorry about that. If you derive some method for accurately observing and making predictions on the non real (whatever the hell that is) then make it known please.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Gee you'd think those interested in discovery might wonder what animates the body with life, intelligence, thinks etc.
I've already addressed this.
The brain is a network of neurons. We can measure brain activity using imaging techniques such as MRI. We don't have any reason to believe that consciousness is separated from the brain.
Originally posted by hawkiye
reply to post by PieKeeper
I've already addressed this.
The brain is a network of neurons. We can measure brain activity using imaging techniques such as MRI. We don't have any reason to believe that consciousness is separated from the brain.
And I have already debunked your address, but here we go again. So the thousands of people who were clinically dead with no brain activity yet reported out of body experiences, even to what the doctors or people were doing in the room, that they couldn't possibly have known (remember no brain activity). They experienced with meeting other beings and experiencing a whole other world beyond the physical with thier consciousness intact, and did I mention no brain activity so you can't say it was a hallucination. All that means nothing to you and gives you no reason to think consciousness can be separated from the brain? Thanks again for illustrating my point. Short sightedness indeed...edit on 20-2-2011 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)
You haven't illustrated anything apart from extreme ignorance.
You make claims, refuse to provide support for them, ridicule the opposition, and proceed to make another unfounded claim.
(nonsensical insults and accusations snipped for brevity) The only thing I've seen you do is come out of the gate anti-science, and act as if your completely unfounded claim of the non-physical holds more weight than REALITY.
As it turns out, metaphysical claims still need to be justified...Hmm imagine that. Bringing up quantum mechanics just makes me wonder if you're purposefully trying to copy charlatans like Deepak Chopra.
Originally posted by hawkiye
So the thousands of people who were clinically dead with no brain activity yet reported out of body experiences, even to what the doctors or people were doing in the room, that they couldn't possibly have known (remember no brain activity). They experienced with meeting other beings and experiencing a whole other world beyond the physical with thier consciousness intact, and did I mention no brain activity so you can't say it was a hallucination. A
Originally posted by hawkiye
Excuse me I don't recall you posting any support for your claims just insults and arrogance. Pot meet kettle.... Sigh!
Originally posted by hawkiye
I am merely suggesting that science by limiting itself to the physical is short sighted and has slowed its progress because of its unwillingness to go beyond this point. Science and metaphysics will one day come together despite the flat earthers.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
I myself have had an out of body experience on more than one occasion, does that make me delusional? am I insane, unfit for purpose?