It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pajoly
reply to post by Flatfish
Let's be completely honest: Boehner said those words in context of the potential loss of FEDERAL jobs -- the payroll of which has reportedly grown over 200k just since Obama took office. Viewed in that context, it still might be blunt, but it is a truth. If you want to cut federal spending, there must be a commensurate negative impact on the federal payroll. I don't like Boehner at all (I think he is unstable and a fraud, like most of his peers and he is trying to seak $450M of pork into the budget for his district), but you telling half truths is just as bad.
Originally posted by beezzer
I joined a conspiracy site. Thread upon thread is about government this and government that.
Contrails.
Area 51.
9/11.
et al.
Yet, I see people hyperventilate when someone ACTUALLY wants to cut government.
Which is it, people? Do you want bigger government with it's flouride and contrails and NSA and UFO's and Nirubu and talking about sheeple and RFID chips and . . . . ad nuseum.
Or do you want smaller government?
Less control.
More freedom.
To quote a friend of mine, Bill Shakespeare, "Methinks you doth protest too much."
Originally posted by pajoly
reply to post by Flatfish
Let's be completely honest: Boehner said those words in context of the potential loss of FEDERAL jobs -- the payroll of which has reportedly grown over 200k just since Obama took office. Viewed in that context, it still might be blunt, but it is a truth. If you want to cut federal spending, there must be a commensurate negative impact on the federal payroll. I don't like Boehner at all (I think he is unstable and a fraud, like most of his peers and he is trying to seak $450M of pork into the budget for his district), but you telling half truths is just as bad.
Originally posted by Raist
reply to post by beezzer
Wow, you just through PC out the window. I do however agree with you.
Personal responsibility and "manning up" is what this country needs a huge heaping dose of.
Raist
Originally posted by Maxmars
I find it humorous that people think the size of government has anything to do with its corruption and wastefulness.
Sad, to think that those who never know homelessness, hunger, and despair eagerly tell those who do to 'man up.'
Angry to think that the solution to our communities problems can be polarized into a one-size-fits-all answer.
Define 'big.' At what point is government small enough? Or big enough?
Who draws the line? Those who have (of course)?
And those who don't are what?... excess baggage to be purged (or punished).... that's the 'final solution' thinking in action.
"Government" is the problem only after our lack of community....
Originally posted by beezzer
Nice tap dance. I stand by what I said. Have I known hunger? Yep. Have I been unemployed? Yep.
Did I take a dime from government?
No.
Years ago, working a crummy job, my wife got pregnant. She stopped work. I took a second job washing dishes at night. I provided. It's my responsibility.
Want my definition of big government?
One that thinks entitlements are a "right".
One that thinks liberties are traded for TSA patdowns.
One that thinks tax dollars are "theirs".
One that thinks the Constitution was written on a dry-erase board to be altered at a whim.
I give 10% of my pay to charity every year. Do you? I help, my family helps with food kitchens, food banks(though my favorite is St. Judes Childrens Hospital), what do you do?
Have you "manned up"? I have.
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow wrote a poem about the villiage blacksmith. One line I have always remembered.
"For he looks the whole world in the face
For he owes not any man."
Criticize what you will, parse what I say. But I stand by my words, and act upon them on a daily basis.
Originally posted by Maxmars
This conversation, however, was not meant to be about you. It is about those who feel their passage through tribulation, and their ordeals of life entitle them to cast judgment on others. That's the "entitlement" that I reject. It is very VERY clear that too many think the government owes them much..... I call them corporations. It is clear that the government is wrongly placed in a position to subsidize under-productive and poorly managed groups.... like banks and industries who will not suffer the indignity of investing in competitiveness...