Earthquake Swarm in Arkansas Intensifies. Memphis, Tennessee could be epicenter for the next big one, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 287 times


reply posted on 16-2-2011 @ 09:15 AM by butcherguy
reply to post by kennylee

I have seen Robin excited before, but usually about predicting quakes at yellowstone.

I haven't seen him like this before though. It worries me a bit, although I am not in an area of concern, I worry about those who are.


reply posted on 16-2-2011 @ 09:21 AM by G.A.G.
reply to post by butcherguy



I too reside in the New Madrid zone and will follow this thread closely. Robin, did the "frost quake", that occurred in indiana, show up on seismograph readings?


reply posted on 16-2-2011 @ 09:26 AM by kennylee
reply to post by butcherguy



I hear what you are saying. I have followed the Yellowstone thread for the past three years and have followed all of Robins threads. Yes, he did get excited one time during all the swarms at Yellowstone, but with very good reason at the time and I was really glad to have his input. It was back then that I realized that Robin knew a lot about quakes.

I live just north of Louisville and when the big one does hit, it will more than likely topple structures here. I remember a small quake back in 1979 that registered I believe a 5.3 and it knocked down bricks and cracked walls in Louisville. I believe it was centered somewhere in Indiana, I'm not sure. I will do some research and see if I can find it.

So yes, if Robin is concerned about the New Madrid, we should all be concerned. Scientist even say its not an IF but a WHEN it goes. Robin is just trying to pin down the WHEN for us...


reply posted on 16-2-2011 @ 09:45 AM by kennylee
The quake I was thinking about in 1979 actually was in 1980, and was in NorthEast Ky near Bath County. Here is the link on the damage caused.
earthquake.usgs.gov...

This was the first earthquake I had ever felt. I was standing outside with my family in our front yard. We first heard it, then felt it. It sounded like a locomotive coming with a big roar, then the ground started shaking enough to make my legs feel rubbery. It only lasted a few seconds, then was gone with the roaring sound fading.

It was a 5.2. I couldnt imagine a bigger one like a 7.0 hitting here.

Robin, how big do you think the Big One could possibly be for this area?


reply posted on 16-2-2011 @ 09:46 AM by butcherguy
reply to post by Doc Holiday



From Geo 101 something bothered me from the get go...sand....there is sand...and I mean lots of sand in a small area of Arkansas, "it should not be there" and after more research, I started noticing sand, when found in places not ment to be...are most often tale tell...signs of EQ and or volcanic activity. This is pretty much ground zero for the last swarm of quakes...the area of sand at least 20x20 mile area. To be more specific to the area I can get GE coord later...but its 3 miles west of where Caney river runs into the Buffulo river. I have a mutual friend there...they "Shipmans" own and opperate a camp ground and bed/breakfast type thing. Last I spoke to them they had two of their 4 cottages rented out to gov't officials.....EQ specialists. All the info. they can get from the gov't guy is that there is definately something worthy of further study here.

Great info, Doc!

Thanks for posting that, esp. about govt EQ experts. STAR


reply posted on 16-2-2011 @ 09:47 AM by boo1981
reply to post by Robin Marks



Here are the images that you have link to above.
This is today:


And Yesterday:
edit on 16/2/11 by boo1981 because: spelling what else!!



reply posted on 16-2-2011 @ 09:50 AM by Robin Marks
I hope I'm wrong as well. My best evidence is the quakes themselves and this new report I found. I'll repost my conclusion from the QuakeWatch thread here. And the report. And the most recent list with 700 earthquakes over the last many months.

www.ouramazingplanet.com...

"From the report I just posted regarding mid-continental earthquakes.

"Now, new research from the University of Missouri suggests that inner-continental quakes such as China's may abide by a different set of rules than those that occur along plate boundaries."


This means the New Madrid Zone and Yellowstone and the surrounding mountains and fault act by their own rules and aren't like those occuring in California.

From the report,

"Along plate boundaries, small and moderate earthquakes that rupture along a particular fault lead to a build-up of stress along that same fault line, but mid-continent faults are connected to each other in a complex network, and a large earthquake along one fault will instead put pressure on a different fault."

This means that it's unlikely that the New Madrid will rupture in the same area. The larger quakes will migrate. So why is this important. It means that there is a connection between quakes in one area affecting the fault system of another at a much greater distance than geologists think. They believe that most activity is very local and contained with a particular fault. This means that earthquakes around these areas may be connected and this interaction is not understood. So. Earthquakes outside of Yellowstone have a relationship and can be putting stresses on the faults above the magma chamber. This means the earthquake in Arkansas my be destablizing a larger fault. Possibly under Memphis.

So if the Arkansas quakes are caused by fracking, this means the activity could have far reaching consequences. The deep well injection disposal is a known cause of earthquakes and there is injection in Arkansas. So fracking may be directly responsible for causing the next big quake in the Mississippi River area.

Remember that the New Madrid earthquake was not one quake. There were four. First starting in Arkansas and then migrate to the northeast. Coincidently, the trend of earthquakes near Guy, Arkansas, runs in the same direction. From the southwest up to the northeast.

So fracking is not a good idea.

They are fracking south of Yellowstone. The geologists have convinced everyone that what happens on one side of the mountains have very little to do with events on the farside. It looks like they might be wrong. It looks like quakes near Yellowstone can change things above the chamber.

So fracking is an insane idea."

Link to map.


Here's the map.


folkworm.ceri.memphis.edu...


edit on 16-2-2011 by Robin Marks because: (no reason given)
edit on Sat Feb 19 2011 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



California going off!
  Posted 16 days ago with 146 member flags
Ice Age Flower Blooms After 32000 Years!
  Posted 15 days ago with 79 member flags
Experts Warn Mount Fuji is Dangerously Close to Erupting
  Posted 5 days ago with 66 member flags
Man building his own island out of plastic bottles
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
Simple way to discover if your produce is GMO.
  Posted 2 days ago with 46 member flags