It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Farrell and Stevens believe that one component of this project was associated with time manipulation while another was concerned with the controlled bending of time space (Farrell calls this a torsion bomb).
Originally posted by Dalbeck
. Just look on the right side there's a plane that actually looks like a design for the B2 ! I don't know if you can see it on the thread page, just look into my actual gallery and you'll see what I mean
Originally posted by Bordon81
reply to post by Kellyct1987
Farrell and Stevens believe that one component of this project was associated with time manipulation while another was concerned with the controlled bending of time space (Farrell calls this a torsion bomb).
You have to put yourself in the position of the German scientists involved. Obviously they watched in terror as the world spun out of control in political madness and Germany was close to losing the war. After seeing how the concentration camp guards with average IQ's of less than 95 responded to starvation rations and Mein Kampf propaganda, maybe the top scientists felt that the time was not right to give their military leaders a terrible new mega weapon? Its not beyond comprehension to believe that such a weapon used in hurried desperation might end up yielding unthinkably terrible results. There is quite a bit of evidence that the Nazi military knew an atomic bomb could be built and that they were pressuring the German scientists to build them one. History suggests that the top German scientists dragged their feet and never considered building one in war time.
It was the "Jew Science" of Oppenheimer and Feynman that were credited with actually delivering a working bomb at White Sands New Mexico. Oppenheimers first reaction was "We are all sons of bitches now". He obviously knew their bomb was going to kill a lot of people. I've sometimes cautioned my Jewish friends not to take too much pride in the accomplishment when they start yelling "we got the bomb baby!". If it was clear Germany would not build a bomb that could be used against the US then part of the rational for developing a deadly super weapon is lost.
But then you are told that we could not have immediately won the war against Japan without an atomic bomb so it saved US soldiers lives. Problem with that argument is that Japanese never attacked the US mainland. Much of the early conflict was about the US airlines looking for routes to expand their service into the Pacific. The Japanese Imperial government didn't like the idea of the United States expanding control into the Pacific. Theoretically the US forces could have pulled their ships back and defended Hawaii rather than lose soldiers attacking the Japanese mainland. Could they have bullied Japan into surrendering by setting off atomic bombs near the coast rather then over the cities until the Imperialist government surrendered?
Of course the answer we were all taught is that the Asian mind was suicidal and would fight to the death. The Japanese Imperialist government was raping China and the rest of the Asian rim nations so the use of Atomic bombs on the cities was a necessary and heroic action.
edit on 10-2-2011 by Bordon81 because: (no reason given)