reply to post by babloyi
I laugh because I find things funny. I laugh a lot, and I dislike the use of "lol", that just sounds stupid. If you are feeling sensitive about my
laughing, then there is perhaps some issue on YOUR side?
See, again, your accusation of "ad hominems" from me makes me laugh, considering it was YOU who were being uncivil with the attacks, not me. Of
course, now, one of those posts by you have been removed by a moderator, and the other has been edited so that now instead of being a "butthurt fan
of Islam", I'm a "wimpering fan of Islam". I haven't been rude to anyone so far (notwithstanding your dislike of my laughing). To you, I simply
pointed out that your source was wrong (either intentionally misleading- lying, or unintentionally ignorant), and you lashed back with a fury.
To poet1b now I've levelled the accusation of racism, but I don't think he denies it in the least. He's made it very clear that he hates arabs,
hates arab culture, hates arab traditions, hates "arab religion" (as he calls it). I think that is a very fair definition of "racist". And the
accusation of "blatant propaganda garbage" didn't come from ME, it came from poet1b. After that, I made the assertion that he really has no idea
about the history of India, and is only using whatever knowledge he has for the purposes of attacking Islam. I think any person who has even basic
knowledge of India would tell him as well that he is wrong.
Anyhow, I'm sorry for the large off-topic, but to be fair, you started it

.
To bring it back on track, let me ask a simple question. Do you acknowledge that the edited versions of the Quranic quotes you quoted in your OP are
most definitely different and distorted when compared to the actual, complete quotes such as the one I posted? Because then that is definitely a point
against the premise of your thread.
Now I am making an attempt to get this thread back on track, I hope you will stick with it as well (it is "your" thread, after all).
reply to post by poet1b
Hey poet. I didn't say you should use wiki as a source. If you check, you'll see I suggested you check the references in the wikipedia articles.
They are most definitely more reliable.
Also, if you note, I didn't deny that there had been Muslim conquests in India. My point was in response to your claim that there are no native
indian muslims (that they are all great great grandchildren of arabs), which I have to say, is patently absurd, even from a logical point of view,
nevermind through historical analysis.
Your india gov was the most unbiased of those links you provided, but it doesn't touch on this topic.