Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by atlasastro
You accuse people “of manipulation of the truth,” yet you do not know what the truth is.
I have not made accusations, I have proven this to be fact. You manipulated the truth.
Why don’t you demonstrate with credible evidence (sources) to how the OP and burntheships has lied to you?
No problem.
Here you go:
Your entire OP is a spin, you use a source unrelated to Wiki in anyshape or form that you have misunderstood, and a quote from Assange in order to
perpetuate the accusation that Wiki is fabricating material to support the OS of 9/11.
Again, please provide a link to a WIKILEAKS release that is faked to be supportive of the OS of 9/11.
Here is the link to Wiki in order for you to show us here on ATS that Wiki releases material that supports the OS of 9/11.
wikileaks.ch...
There is a link to the entire Archive on that page, you can download it and show us the material you accuse Wiki of faking to support the OS 9/11.
Again, please provide evidence that proves these leaks, that you claim are from Wiki, are faked in order to support the OS of 9/11.
I will remind you AGAIN, of your claim in the OP.
These are your words.
WikiLeaks, Proven Fraud in Protecting The OS of 911!
New evidence has surfaced proven WikiLeaks, a fraud in concocting reports to prop up the OS of 911.
post by impressme
The reality is though, is that you have confused an Article WRITTEN by Sibel relating to the "FBI informants" memorandum releases, with STATEMENTS
made by SIbel.
You fail.
Sibel is REPORTING, she is the REPORTER, she has written the REPORT you link.
The MATERIAL, she is REPORTING in the REPORT that she REPORTED differs from HER personal statements relating to 9/11.
When you comprehend that, you may start to see some convergence between reality and your ability to percieve it.
Let me break it down for you.
I am not surprised at the stupidity of WikiLeaks to think the American people have short term memories, of who is Sibel Edmonds, and what
profound role she played in outing the governments’ lies of their boogieman OBL as being the Mastermind to 911. Yet in an interview on the Mike
Malloy Show back in 7/31/2009, Sibel Edmonds blew the whistle, that Bin Laden was working for the United States all the way up to 911.
post by impressme
We all know who Sibel is now? Right!
Now lets look at the Source from the ATS thread you linked.
The FBI "Kamikaze Pilots" Case; Omitted From 911 Commission Report- Article by Sibel Edmonds
www.opednews.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The FBI "Kamikaze Pilots" Case; Omitted From 911 Commission Report
By Sibel Edmonds (about the author)[
The article is BY Sibel.
Yet you seem to think the material in the article REPORTED by SIBEL is somehow faked and that this report is linked to WIKI.
The FBI "Kamikaze Pilots" Case; Omitted From 911 Commission Report- Article by Sibel Edmonds
Is not the work or admissions from Sibel Edmonds, the facts speak for themselves.
And you are right in the above statement, the article BY SIbel is not related to the ADMISSIONS of SIBEL but they are related to this:
In a public
statement issued on Monday, January 31, members of the 9/11 Family Steering Committee demanded a prompt response from the former Chairman and the
Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission regarding Former FBI Language Specialist Behrooz Sarshar's censored testimony to the Commission. The
former commissioners failed to respond to this request.
SIBEL IS REPORTING ON THIS MATERIAL.
It has nothing to do with SIBELS PERSONAL ADMISSIONS.
NOW.
If you can please provide evidence as to how this article
REPORTED by SIBEL who is REPORTING on
THIS:
Other than that, the information below is exactly what was recounted by Mr. Sarshar on four
occasions:
www.opednews.com... is somehow faked by wiki I would
appreciate it.
So, in summary.
Please provide the links to WIKI that relate to the WIKI releases that support the OS of 9/11.
Please provie the evidence that they are fake.
Please show that this article By SIBEL, is faked by WIKI.
www.opednews.com...
Please explain why you think Sibel reporting on the statements of Mr. Sarshar in this
articleare some how evidence that Sibels
admissions and personal statements have been attacked by Wiki in order to support the OS of 9/11.
If you want to "play ignorant" then I hope you don’t mind if I don't respond.
You did respond, with nothing but more accusations and opinion.
To infer that I am a debunker is as absurd as the weak correlations and innuendo you have constructed in your OP. There is nothing to debunk.
Again, please provide the evidence to support your statements.
Please enlighten me if you do believe I am playing ignorant!
WikiLeaks, Proven Fraud in Protecting The OS of 911!
New evidence has surfaced proven WikiLeaks, a fraud in concocting reports to prop up the OS of 911.
post by impressme
Why don’t you present credible evidence to how the OP and burntheships has made up lies, false accusations and deliberate
dis-information?
I just did so in regards to your OP AGAIN!
O.K.
For Burntheships:
post by atlasastro
I doubt that you can answer my questions, because you are expressing yourself from a belief system, perhaps created from the very thing you
accuse others of regurgitating, such as (MSM.)
Dude, I have answered EVERY post you have addresses to me. Point to one post where I source MSM. I simply don't. I have used all the material YOU and
Burntheships have posted, and I have linked Wiki in order for you to provide us here on ATS with some factual evidence to support both your
arguments.
Both you and Burntheships have failed to simply shoe Wiki behaving in the manner that you claim.
You have continuously ignored my requests to simply supply this as per you accustaions, AND you have simply ignored my posts.
Instead of doing that you now attack me, this is the typical cowardice I would expect so I am not surprised nor distracted by this tactic and it
simply reeks of the desperation of a feeble intellect unable to withstand the scrutiny that logic and truth has applied to you, OP.
Once again, all you need to do is this:
Please reply with a link to any wiki releases that support the OS of 9/11.
Please supply evidence that these are false.
Please show how Wiki is responsible for Sibels article relating to material you link, and provide evidence that Wiki has fraudulently created this to
support the OS. of 9/11.
Pretty simply really.
The truth is that you cannot simply provide ATS members with any material that supports your false acussations.
Otherwise you would have by now. That is the truth.
You might want to do some real research before you start calling people a liar.
You have not disproved a single piece of evidence that has been presented in here against Julian Assange.
I know I have not disproved anything, because I am simply showing that you actually have proven nothing to begin with. All you have is a correlation
of mis-information that you have deliberately constructed in order to make a false accustaion.
I have proven that. So there is no need to disprove you accustaion because they it is blindingly obvious that they are false and illogical.
I suspect you will probably reply with more inane slobber instead of simply showing this:
Please reply with a link to any wiki releases that support the OS of 9/11.
Please supply evidence that these are false.
Please show how Wiki is responsible for Sibels article relating to material you link, and provide evidence that Wiki has fraudulently created this to
support the OS. of 9/11.
