The South Atlantic Anomaly, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 36 times


reply posted on 17-2-2011 @ 04:40 AM by fakedirt
reply to post by Truth1000


are you suggesting that it is feasible to harvest/collect positrons in abundence? i am aware of the difficulties down here on terra firma with regards to the embodied energy requirements for such a task. the ability to simply collect them in this zone would be very cost effective. uses i suppose could range from energy production to radioactive hazard negation. so in essence gravity is a hinderance when it comes to the more exotic experiments and developments.
regards f


reply posted on 17-2-2011 @ 05:08 AM by Truth1000
reply to post by fakedirt



fakedirt,

Thank you, fakedirt! You are the first to recognize this! Hooray!

Gravitational forces must be overcome on a continuous basis while performing certain sections of these key experiments while on Earth. In microgravity, with up to 11 minutes of "free ionization," ionization fragments can be exploited in the Anomaly that would be so expensive as to be nearly prohibitive. However, even unmanned low-Earth satellites can perform these functions in silence and with relative ease. Naturally, what the experiments are remain extremely classified, but the environment is highly unique.

For more specific Q&A, feel free to U2U me, fakedirt. I will be pleased to discuss aspect that would be inappropriate on this forum. Also, please go back and read my thread about HED physics, because there could be some real "nuggets" that you might perceive, that have not yet been recognized.



reply posted on 17-2-2011 @ 05:57 AM by fakedirt
reply to post by Truth1000



hi truth1000
i will indeed clue up on your hed thread. it may be at the speed of a slug! the potential of the saa is fantastic to say the least. i am now at the point of seeing certain avenues of thought converging with regards to the embodied potential. it was literally in our faces all this time. thank you for your patience with this monkey. i think i'll treat myself to a banana!
i'll take you up on the u2u offer.
regards f

i have just thought of a possible appropriate aperture for the collection of said particles. with an 11 minute window, i feel the design must be the most functional and efficient for the purpose.
edit on 17-2-2011 by fakedirt because: picture in my mind



reply posted on 17-2-2011 @ 11:31 AM by sixswornsermon
reply to post by Truth1000



I read your HED thread. Interesting.

From what I understand Positron harvesting on Earth is extremely costly. Also, you need reliable containment. As an aside I read somewhere about a new containment system recently:

Anti Matter Containment System

So from what I gather from this thread, and the HED thread, positrons could be harvested and used to create a new breed of nuclear weapon, as well as a potential energy source?

ETA:

I wonder if gravity affects the storage of positrons as well.......
edit on 17-2-2011 by sixswornsermon because: eta random thought



reply posted on 17-2-2011 @ 12:26 PM by Truth1000
reply to post by sixswornsermon



You guys are really starting to catch on. However, anti-matter is not a player here, but there are other high-energy particles that we humans still have trouble replicating that are just sitting there in the Anomaly doing nothing useful on a normal day. Thus, we canmange to utilize excited-state particles without providing ANY energy source to create them!

The HED physics is not strictly related to the topic in the Anomaly thread, but we are trying to create materials with the lasers that we have no other means to create at this time. The energy created, however, is sort of a two-headed monster - it is capable of amazing benefits when used for peaceful purposes, but could be so disastrous if used improperly that it is as if we are again at the start of the 20th Century and just starting to understand nuclear physics, with the possibilities of nuclear power plants, or 20-megaton bombs, depending on who is using it and for what purpose!

Still, you guys are restoring my faith in the power of the minds of the people on this site!




reply posted on 17-2-2011 @ 12:51 PM by 9Cib27
reply to post by Truth1000



In subject to "free energy" what specific details of a machine could pull useful particles out of "thin air" Would it need to be made of a specific material or be built in a specific way? Do we need to do anything to these high energy particles to use them? If air is moving at it's fastest speed, it is at it's lowest pressure... If we pull air through something fast enough and bottleneck it into a small enough space?


reply posted on 17-2-2011 @ 01:22 PM by sixswornsermon
reply to post by Truth1000



The gears are certainly turning thanks to your threads. So thank you, Truth, for your efforts. I appreciate your leading the proverbial horse to water.

I find it very beneficial to to come across somebody of actual knowledge on this site. Cuts the doldrums from the normal tripe presented here.

I have more questions on this topic, but I'm not entirely sure what they are yet, so I'm off to read some more of your threads.


reply posted on 18-2-2011 @ 03:07 AM by Truth1000
reply to post by 9Cib27



There is no air at the altitudes at which the Anomaly exists. The actual mechanisms are quite complex, classified, and while I have an idea of what they do, I never had access to the information of what was going on inside the "black box" experiments. In the discussions I had with the scientists about these events, my limited knowledge of sub-atomic particle mechanics made my questions to them more annoying than enlightening.


reply posted on 7-5-2011 @ 10:03 AM by fakedirt
reply to post by Truth1000



hello truth1000
could you possibly shed light on the alpha magnetic spectrometer? is it to be utilised initially to determine the ingredients of the saa soup? i suppose after 15+ years in the construction of, it would be fitting for this payload to be used to identify the exotic particles initially and then possibly formulate a game plan in the manner and approach to collection. i am sure this is connected with the saa, however i could be mistaken. another consideration would be the fact mission specialist 3, drew feustel is on the team and with his expertise in geological sciences, could part of this mission be to observe any possible saa/tectonic interactions?
regards fakedirt


reply posted on 28-7-2011 @ 05:49 PM by tomra
reply to post by fakedirt



Aah, too bad his gone but then again, most good posters have a fairly short stay here. Guess that´s what you get for stirring the pot.

fakedirt, you suspect he is an astronaut?


reply posted on 29-7-2011 @ 05:05 AM by fakedirt
reply to post by tomra


it was tongue in cheek but you just never know!
i know t1000 has been and may well still be involved in the field of space medicine. if you look at his profile, you will see information on the guy and his connection with nasa. if i remember correctly, i think he was working in trauma er not too long ago after his tenureship at the space agency.
it would be nice to hear from him again.
f.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Interesting Places- Interesting Bases-
  Posted 4 days ago with 8 member flags
\'Inside Pine Gap: The Spy Who Came in From The Desert\' Book
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Lockheed out at the TTR?
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags
YF-16 tested at a "secret base near Nellis"
  Posted 5 days ago with 2 member flags