It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We were told after 9/11 that two different members of Alans family, thousands of miles apart, had visions at about 10AM on 9/11/2001 of Alan Beaven singing at the top of his lungs while he wrestled with people in a cockpit. And of course, even though no plane was recovered from Shanksville, they were able to still find Alan Beavens ring inside the cockpit where he was singing and wrestling Arabs. The whole Alan Beaven story is so thick you can spot it as fake simply by the overkill.
We were told that Alan Beaven was a former Scotland Yard prosecutor via USA Today and other news sources. We sent in a FOIA to Scotland Yard, and Alan Beaven was never a prosecutor for Scotland Yard. That was a lie.
We have also discovered fake victims at the Pentagon. You will recall seeing no body bags being pulled out of the Pentagon or carried away. You will not recall seeing any footage of ambulance after ambulance taking away the Pentagon dead.
We have discovered roughly 48 victims at the Pentagon that can be shown to be proven frauds through the digital data embedded on their memorial pictures. We are still working on some files but are going to be releasing these soon.
The fact of the matter is this; Nobody can verify a single death on 9/11. On a day which claimed thousands, what death did you see? Where? I am not claiming that nobody died. I am simply stating the facts, None of us saw any death on 9/11, even the "jumper footage" being released after 911, as best as I have seen.
We have to rely on a few bottlenecks to tell us the truth, chiefly the Chief Medical Examiners office in New York City. Frankly whatever it is they told us can be discarded because none of the other pieces fit.
The stark reality is that e have to take this source or that source at face value and as honest and credible, on whether people died on 9/11. Because none of us can independently verify a single death occurred.
Ask yourself this. Did Rudolph Guiliani conspire to murder thousands, 2800 of his fellow rich New York Banker friends? Did Rudi Guiliani, for a few bucks conspire to commit mass murder against 2800 people, many of which he would have known and probably been friends with?
Did Larry Silverstein & Frank Lowie conspire to commit mass murder against many of his banker friends which no doubt would have inhabited the buildings? For a few billion dollars we are to believe that Silverstein and Lowie were part of a plan for financial fraud and mass murder so they could make a few billion bucks?
Silverstein, Frank Lowie, Rudi Guiliani would no doubt have been friends with many of those people, those rich investment bankers at WTC.
Or is it more likely that they were part of a grand hoax? Whats easier, to plan a 30 year conspiracy like 911 and murder 3000 people? Or to plan a 30 year conspiracy where only the illusion of 3000 deaths would occur?
Question 1. How do you get tons of people to participate in a 30 year old conspiracy to commit 3000 murders?
Question 2. How do you get tons of people to participate in a 30 year conspiracy fake 3000 murders?
The answer to the first question is that you cannot get large numbers of people to participate in a 30 year conspiracy to murder 3000 people.
The answer to the second question is the " the 7 billion dollar victims compensation fund."
Question 1. How do you get large numbers of Corporations to participate in a 9/11 hoax?
Would normal corporations ever participate in such a grand hoax such as 9/11? The answer is a simple no. The answer lies in the fact that all of the major corporations above the impact zones are CIA proprietary corporations. Now ask yourself this. Would a bunch of CIA companies participate in a grand scale sized hoax such as 9/11?
And with that answer lies your solution to many perplexing issues of 9/11.
The victims compensation fund was initially set at 7 billion dollars. Many people are unaware of the fact that there was another, larger fund set up. The Business compensation fund. (BCF) It was a fund and an amount agreed upon and settled through government and Insurance companies to "offset the great losses" these companies suffered. The Business compensation fund (BCF) was 38.4 billion dollars!
Originally posted by Lebowski achiever
reply to post by Human_Alien
I really do not see the point of lying about victims.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
reply to post by Phil Jayhan
Personally I don't get into speculating on the whodunnit. I am interested in facts supported by evidence. If enough facts are presented by credible sources there is a chance for a real investigation.
Could you supply links to the documentation for the FOIA request and responses??
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
We believe it is changing the entire 911 paradigm and will change it completely.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
All of the work becomes self evident once you start to see any aspect of the fraud.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Interesting stuff regarding Barbara Arestegui, Phil. You say that lots of people rang the number and spoke to the Pentagon. Did you record any of those calls?
Bet you didn't.
Originally posted by do2read
Those open minded to research will not let themselves be herded into one of these cattle pens, by any of the assigned gatekeepers, and there are many.
Originally posted by do2read
So, by all means, consider only the info from an "approved research site", and you might as well believe the OS.
There's a very big difference between "research" and "misinformation/disinformation".
Originally posted by Ivar_Karlsen
reply to post by Phil Jayhan
Yo Phil, seen the pod lately?
Having had a look at your board i'm now beginning to understand what your agenda is.
edit on 17-1-2011 by Ivar_Karlsen because: (no reason given)edit on 17-1-2011 by Ivar_Karlsen because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
We do legitimate research and all you do is misinform people.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
all your pre-approved 911 people
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
You guys can't really slam this like you would like or debunk it
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
We have obtained a legal document which shows that the world trade center was a literal paper tiger. Barely occupied the entire life of the tower
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
We have legal proof. Legal documents. And they show the tower was empty nearly all of it's life, until right before 911.
Originally posted by Phil Jayhan
magic time is over.
And again, only your opinion which is based off of a document that has admitted mistakes in it.
Originally posted by do2read
You failed to address any of my above questions about why the PA would present such a ficticious document, as you claim it to be.
Originally posted by do2read
If someone at A&E had received it, would you still be chasing this poor logic?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by do2read
You failed to address any of my above questions about why the PA would present such a ficticious document, as you claim it to be.
Professing that the towers were nearly empty for most of their lives when all other sources say otherwise, is not the truth. It's false.
Get the picture now?
edit on 17-1-2011 by _BoneZ_ because: (no reason given)