It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Byrd
It took two to make the baby.
Originally posted by mwm1331
I dont understand the so called "pro-choice" movement never have never will. Aside from the fact that I think its misnamed, (afterall the child being killed doesnt get a choice) I just cant accept that the murder of an unborn infant is not morally reprehensble. But this thread isn't about me or my views its about you and yours (yes I'm talking to YOU) so tell me How do you justify the so called "pro-choice" stance?
the cultural acceptance that guys should run around and have all the unprotected sex they want
Originally posted by mwm1331
The baby is not a part of the mothers body she is just a vessel in which the child is formed.
Originally posted by mwm1331
I. But as you said it takes two and both partners, man and woman, need to take responsibillity for making the right choice. It only takes one person to be protected but it takes both people to have unprotected sex. [edit on 8-7-2004 by mwm1331]
Originally posted by StrangeLands
[So what's the "morally reprehensible" choice? To remove, surgically or medically, a cluster of cells, or bring an unwanted, unplanned, often unsupported child into an already-overpopulated world?
Originally posted by StrangeLands
Abortions are performed on unrealised potential human beings - so to be opposed to abortion is no different to being opposed to male masturbation.
So what's the "morally reprehensible" choice? To remove, surgically or medically, a cluster of cells, or bring an unwanted, unplanned, often unsupported child into an already-overpopulated world?