I get the feeling that you are just playing word games at this point. Yes, everything is technically a belief, but not all beliefs can validate their
reality with facts.
Well with this you once again validated by statement. Once again, a fact is whatever we perceive it to be.
A common misperception is the fact that science can explain everything. Well obviously our current science cannot explain everything, it would take
dramatic mutations of science to do that.
You say it would be illogical or irrational. It is only such within the scope of our current knowledge/beliefs.
Science cannot explain or validate everything, including the existance of God. I think it is equally foolish, illogical, irrational, to believe in
the non-existance of God based on our current knowledge/beliefs. The point is, we do not know either way.
And while it may seem I am playing mere word games, I am trying to drive the point that science is based on conditions, assumptions, presuppositions,
and that it cannot explain close to everything, ascribing instead to randomness. I think someone said "All experiments are affected by the
observer."
I am not asking you to prove the non-existance of God, but I think it is foolish to believe we are omniscient. A feel for something is as much a
belief as your science facts.
You assume that something doesn't exist until it is proven. Just as some assume that something exists until it is unproven.
One is the only real number.
Ah, yes, lets assume this....the godly number, everything comes from one. Why can't God be that number. I see how it can and can't, depends on
what your reality is.
Number is a man-made system by the way..
Note: I don't subscribe to any organized religion or such. But I don't tell people they are foolish for doing so either.
[edit on 7-7-2004 by Jamuhn]