Let's start way back when the Earth first started forming, we're talking 4.5 billion years ago and Earth was just a spinning mass of dust and gas. Now imagine this as a giant centrifuge, all of the heavier elements get pulled into the centre, creating a solid mass, which became earth. Over the millions of years out gassing, volcanic activity and ice laden comets striking this mass created water vapour which in turn created the oceans blah blah blah!

This is high school stuff and has quite simply debunked the hollow earth theory because there is no way the Earth could have been formed as a hollow shell.

I would love to hear a counter argument against the above.

So as I said, hollow earth is debunked already but let's load up the bases.

Isaac Newton's shell theorem

Isaac Newton proved the shell theorem saying that:
1. A spherically symmetric body affects external objects gravitationally as though all of its mass were concentrated at a point at its centre.
2. If the body is a spherically symmetric shell (i.e. a hollow ball), no gravitational force is exerted by the shell on any object inside, regardless of the object's location within the shell.
3. Inside a solid sphere of constant density the gravitational force varies linearly with distance from the centre, becoming zero at the centre of mass.

So what does that mean for the hollow Earth theory? it means if the Earth was hollow, and you were inside, you would not be effected by gravity and be weightless.

Seismology

There have been many advances in seismic technology over the years, seismologists have been able to create detailed images of wave speeds inside the earth much like the way a doctor images a body in a CT scan.

This method gives a much more detailed view of the interior of the Earth.

Mass

For the hollow Earth theory to be true there would need to be a mystical and undiscovered super heavy element in the outer skin of the Earth to account for the missing mass from the middle of the planet.

So there you have it, four damn good reasons why hollow earth is impossible.

Let me repost a slightly changed (for context and to remove the rant style ) post that I posted in one of the other hollow earth threads .

Why do all the deniers have to repeat the "earth is not hollow , science tells us this is impossible" motto all the time .. Of course it is not hollow like a ballon , but there is a big possibility that it might have huge (and I mean really huge) caverns that could host countries inside ..

So no ,we will not fall down to the center of the earth after we find a opening underneath , but we might find ourselves in a huge country sized cavern that could host a whole civilization .

The deepest that we have ever drilled (not even visited ) was , what 7-8 miles ? We have no idea how the crust behaves and how it is formed on the deeper levels .. All we know is just a vague theory on how we think it could be , but every geologist (?) will tell You (at least every honest one) , that really we have no idea what is below us .


So , yes it might be exactly like You think it is , but there is as much possibility that the insides of our lovely planet are much different then we think on deeper levels.

Sorry for the rant but it just got to me , that all those supposedly intelligent debunker's fail to use something called logic while debating anything..

So just to sum up , a lot of people are open to the fact that we might have huge caverns below us and using the term "hollow earth" just for the sake of calling the theory somehow

This is one of those threads that has an aggressive overture to it. Why does this bother you so? I think Im pretty open about things. And new discoveries and overturned knowledge happens everyday. Did you read something that really bugged you? What would you do if we find out someday that it is 1/2 true? Or partially true? Or was maybe ONCE true, but not now? Common perception in the past was that the Earth was once flat as well.

It may not be likely, and sure there may not be Aliens, Ghosts or the Easter Bunny...but why jump on it? Still, you do have that right. Just curious!

Nice thread.
The believers keep saying deep within the earth. Well we all know the deeper you go, the more it gets hot. Watch the crystal caves on Nat Geo. It is literally so hot that humans can not survive more than 45 minutes down there. It seems to mee that these believer posters are dismissing common scientific knowledge for their beliefs.

Frequencies, its all about frequency.

I think volcanoes alone disprove the hollow earth theory, all that magma and pressure build up, in different locations on earth to me say a big ball of molten material stretching right round the planet.

Originally posted by woogleuk
I think volcanoes alone disprove the hollow earth theory, all that magma and pressure build up, in different locations on earth to me say a big ball of molten material stretching right round the planet.

volcanoes are not at every location on earth.
view the volcanoes as tubes venting magma
from the core. There are vast regions of rock
around these lava tubes that could suffice
for civilizations to survive. View these lava
tubes (volcanoes) as air ducting in your house.
it gives you a heat source, but you can still
sit in your easy chair and watch TV.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
Let's start way back when the Earth first started forming, we're talking 4.5 billion years ago and Earth was just a spinning mass of dust and gas. Now imagine this as a giant centrifuge, all of the heavier elements get pulled into the centre, creating a solid mass, which became earth. Over the millions of years out gassing, volcanic activity and ice laden comets striking this mass created water vapour which in turn created the oceans blah blah blah!

This is high school stuff and has quite simply debunked the hollow earth theory because there is no way the Earth could have been formed as a hollow shell.

I would love to hear a counter argument against the above.

So as I said, hollow earth is debunked already but let's load up the bases.

Isaac Newton's shell theorem

Isaac Newton proved the shell theorem saying that:
1. A spherically symmetric body affects external objects gravitationally as though all of its mass were concentrated at a point at its centre.
2. If the body is a spherically symmetric shell (i.e. a hollow ball), no gravitational force is exerted by the shell on any object inside, regardless of the object's location within the shell.
3. Inside a solid sphere of constant density the gravitational force varies linearly with distance from the centre, becoming zero at the centre of mass.

So what does that mean for the hollow Earth theory? it means if the Earth was hollow, and you were inside, you would not be effected by gravity and be weightless.

Seismology

There have been many advances in seismic technology over the years, seismologists have been able to create detailed images of wave speeds inside the earth much like the way a doctor images a body in a CT scan.

This method gives a much more detailed view of the interior of the Earth.

Mass

For the hollow Earth theory to be true there would need to be a mystical and undiscovered super heavy element in the outer skin of the Earth to account for the missing mass from the middle of the planet.

So there you have it, four damn good reasons why hollow earth is impossible.

edit on 27/12/10 by Chadwickus because: (reason classified)

While i also agree Hollow Earth is far from being possible, what you've just stated does no favours in your quest to debunk this topic.