It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xiamara
reply to post by mnemeth1
So lets say a suicide bomber tries to blow up a building and no one dies. Then its ok since no one was hurt thats not a crime.. Brilliant logic, no one got hurt no one will get hurt. That's how people die.
Originally posted by Mr. Kraken
Originally posted by mnemeth1
...Punishing someone that hasn’t hurt anyone or damaged anyone else’s property by their actions is wrong...
So by this logic me selling meth to elementary students should be perfectly legal, right? I'm not damaging their property or hurting them, it's their choice of what to do with the drugs, so It's their action that brings the harm. I'm sorry, but I completely disagree with your statement.
Originally posted by Xiamara
reply to post by mnemeth1
So lets say a suicide bomber tries to blow up a building and no one dies. Then its ok since no one was hurt thats not a crime.. Brilliant logic, no one got hurt no one will get hurt. That's how people die.
Originally posted by nwdogg1982
reply to post by RedBird
As much as I strongly disagree with his view on this matter, you have to admit that he brings up some very good points about the ineffectiveness of dui laws. If anything, his "nonsensical" and "criminal" post can be used to further an intellectual debate regarding how we, as society, should be dealing with those who choose to endanger others by driving while intoxicated. I kindly disagree with you, the OP should not be banned from ATS, as that would be a foolish attempt at demeaning free speech.
Originally posted by nwdogg1982
You know, alot of times I look at certain laws and think "Why? Why is this even a law, it has no true purpose other than to con people out of their money." Drunk driving laws are not one of them. Yeah, I agree that they do cost alot of money, but that is money well spent in my opinion. Have you ever seen, or heaven forbid, ridden with, or even worse, been a drunk driver? It may very well be the absolute dumbest thing that anyone could possibly do, let alone one of the most dangerous. Sure, we should look at other ways to reduce the numbers of drunk driving, but looking at those numbers...do you really want all those people driving around you drunk? I sure as heck don't. One solution I have always thought was a good idea...maybe it isn't but I think it is...have mandatory breathalyzers in all vehicles, and require a pass before the vehicle will start.
Originally posted by InvisibleAlbatross
reply to post by mnemeth1
How do you know DUI laws do not stop a large people from drinking and driving?