posted on Dec, 19 2010 @ 11:50 AM
reply to post by zroth
I asked why modern science ignores the evidence of a global humanity that existed before the flood.
Archaeologists and paleontologists alike only make assertions based on evidence; fossil records and other probing methods. If there was evidence of
global humanity before the floods, they would have detected it, which they have.
They also found records of dinosaurs that long potentially predate humans here on earth.
Humans have been on the earth for MINIMUM of 100,000 years, some say 75,000 as the mimimum, but if you're a Christian and you are willing to believe
the doctrine you have to believe that God waited at least 73,000 years before he introduced a savior to humanity, sacrificed him in order to relieve
us of our Sins.
for 73,000 years God watches with indifference to humanity until he finally decided to send his son to the less educated parts of the middle east,
notice how they didn't appeal to the more literate Chinese people. They had to go to the desert to start this cult.
Can't you see why i have a problem with this? Some Christians even believe the earth is only 6,000 years - I ask you this seriously, what kind of
faith is this? Where evidence to contrary proves their faith or "belief" wrong?
Anyway, thanks again for being somewhat civilised.
LOL - "next trip around the sun" - that is brilliant my friend.
edit on 19/12/10 by awake_and_aware because: (no reason given)