It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Yes I know, my father has a "free energy" device: Atmos clock
It won't run in a vacuum but it runs on air and since we live in air, that's even better, he doesn't even have to leave the planet or run a vacuum pump to get a vacuum as required by the devices that claim to run on a vacuum!
But the bosons in that clock called gluons are massless.
And thankfully, no hydrinos are needed.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Basically the universe is all vaccuum which is filled with solids, liquids, plasmas or gasses
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Basically the universe is all vaccuum which is filled with solids, liquids, plasmas or gasses
I strongly advise you to enter a dome connected to a vacuum pump, shut the door and let the pump work for 10 min. After that, you'll post a smashing account of your experience here on ATS.
I'm glad you found it entertaining, and indeed I was making fun of vacuum energy. That's basically the new name for a perpetual motion machine, they had to stop using that old name because some people were beginning to catch on that they might not work. The US patent office stopped issuing patents for perpetual motion or over unity machines without a working model.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Lol. You sound like comedy central. Literally vaccuum energy does not mean that you will
extract it only in vaccuum. Basically the universe is all vaccuum which is filled with solids, liquids, plasmas or gasses
so the vaccuum energy is still there regardless.
So technically a vacuum doesn't contain that stuff. A partial vacuum contains a little bit.
In everyday usage, vacuum is a volume of space that is essentially empty of matter, such that its gaseous pressure is much less than atmospheric pressure.[1] The word comes from the Latin term for "empty". A perfect vacuum would be one with no particles in it at all, which is impossible to achieve in practice. Physicists often discuss ideal test results that would occur in a perfect vacuum, which they simply call "vacuum" or "free space", and use the term partial vacuum to refer to real vacuum.
The guy that lost his pressurization in a vacuum chamber in 1965 said the first thing that happens is the moisture on your tongue boils, then he lost consciousness after about 14 seconds. So the vacuum didn't give him much energy, it seemed to take it away. But they repressurized right away and he was fine. If you don't hold your breath and get repressurized quickly you might last a minute, but maybe not two minutes.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I strongly advise you to enter a dome connected to a vacuum pump, shut the door and let the pump work for 10 min. After that, you'll post a smashing account of your experience here on ATS.
originally posted by: mnemeth1 A bunch of fantasy fiction loving math geeks that think they can create reality out of numbers.
The working models in his lab generate 50 kilowatts of electricity - enough to power six or seven houses. But these, Mills says, can be scaled to drive a large, electric power plant. The inventor claims this electricity will cost less than 2 cents per kilowatt-hour, which compares to a national average of 8.9 cents.
originally posted by: peck420
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist
2010?
Here is Mr. Mills making the same claims...back in 2008.
BlackLight's Physics Defying...
As for working prototype...
The working models in his lab generate 50 kilowatts of electricity - enough to power six or seven houses. But these, Mills says, can be scaled to drive a large, electric power plant. The inventor claims this electricity will cost less than 2 cents per kilowatt-hour, which compares to a national average of 8.9 cents.
From listed source.
Now...I wonder how he managed to misplace the working prototype he had 6 years ago?
originally posted by: peck420
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist
So...just to make sure you have your story straight.
Mr. Mills is currently suppressing free-energy in the form of his CHIT, but won't release it because he couldn't scale it up to entice 'big' clients.
But, we are supposed to believe that he has an even better idea with the 'Sun Cell'.
Yup, it all adds up...just not to the conclusion you are coming too.
originally posted by: peck420
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist
So...just to make sure you have your story straight.
Mr. Mills is currently suppressing free-energy in the form of his CHIT, but won't release it because he couldn't scale it up to entice 'big' clients.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
Now, nearly four years later, I can say with certainty we will see a prototype generator within six months, and most likely see them go to market within a year. In addition, numerous engineering firms and three additional independent university labs have confirmed the findings.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
Where did I say he was suppressing it?
It's not a question of suppression, it's a question of major energy producers being willing to risk a new plant design around his fuel cells.
At the time, he had already inked deals with a few distributors. I don't know what happened to those deals, but I wager they probably put them on hold once Mills figured out how to create the SunCell, which bypasses energy companies altogether.