It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Does it really drop to a point where night adaptation is that rapid?
You said the primary purpose was looking for 'nocturnal critters'.
I don't see where you explain your immediate recognition of something wrong
Hmm, I thought we were supposed to be civil?
Here I am letting the reader decide for themselves - that's what ATS should be about, no?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Does it really drop to a point where night adaptation is that rapid?
Does your reflexive-denial run so deep that you're unable to fathom something in which you have no direct experience?
Consider -- when it's dark outside, normal screen brightness is too bright, so it's normal to turn it down.
You said the primary purpose was looking for 'nocturnal critters'.
Your context of focusing on stars and and the term "night viewing" was assumed.
Should I not have omitted that we have motion-sensitive exterior lighting?
I don't see where you explain your immediate recognition of something wrong
Perhaps you need to re-read the opening post: "I happened to look up at the stars, as I always do whenever I'm out at night, and noticed a bright star that I don't recall seeing before."
Hmm, I thought we were supposed to be civil?
My, aren't you sensitive.
Okay, let me express the sarcasm in more expressive detail.
You're the apparent self-appointed "denialist" from a group of self-exhiled debunkers
who prefer to sequester themselves away in the safety of a very-quiet corner so that they may be afforded the opportunity to poke fun at those with sightings with all the spiteful and reviling language emblematic of those with limited social skills.
In an effort to appear to be a talented denialist, a contrived and unrelated "star puzzle" is presented
along with irrelevant self-indulgent fluffery that comes across as little more than grasping at straw men.
Here I am letting the reader decide for themselves - that's what ATS should be about, no?
You and your merry band of acidic "debunkers" engaged in reflexive-denial have demonstrated an inability to comprehend "what ATS should be about."
Originally posted by punkinworks10
Life might be plentiful in the galaxy, but sentient life, might be extremely rare, thereby making us of interest.
Originally posted by CHRLZ
The brightness of the screen seems to me to be an important point,
If you think it is irrelevant, why not just say so?
both would be best done without using a backlit lcd screen.
It seems a lot of new information is now appearing... The readers will have to judge why that is.
I doubt I would be able to do it,
I doubt even more if i could do it immediately after looking up from a (even 50% less bright) backlit LCD,
No-one, including you, spotted the new stars in my examples, despite at least one being near a famous asterism.
And shouldn't someone who is 'exhiled'[sic], umm.. well.. sorta.. not be here?
personally, I think we should be addressing what this thread is about, but that's just me..
When presented with 4 examples of exactly that, neither you or anyone spotted them. Again, I'll let the readers decide.
What, specifically, were the 'straw men'?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Are you proposing that an iPad screen you think is too bright, without ever using one yourself
...
Your direct experience with a "backlit LCD screen" outside in the evening hours is... what?
I would have assumed that someone interested in actualities, rather than seeking justification for denial
...
OH! Sound the skeptical sirens of debunking!
...
This is ultra-critical folks
...
sheds serious light on SkepticOverlord's ability to see points of light in the sky -- he has lights in his yard!
...
Seriously.
...
you'd grope for a list of irrelevant reasons to explain away seeing something you didn't expect to see.
...
Oh... your little game? Perhaps no one bother [sic] to spend more than a couple minutes, at best.
...
Please feel free to begin discussing something of relevance at any point.
...
Sound those skeptical sirens again.
And shouldn't someone who is 'exhiled'[sic], umm.. well.. sorta.. not be here?
(I said self-exiled.)
Perhaps you might consider beginning with an attempt at helping to examine a potential mundane explanation in my post here.
LCD screens with which you have no experience
Low-res star field "game'
What movie I was watching
Originally posted by CHRLZ
I have:
Do I detect an 'attitude'?
And you thought the screen brightness thing was important enough to mention... can't have it both ways..
Anyway, it's pretty clear this is a dead end, in all respects. So I'll vanish now and let the readers work it out for themselves.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by CHRLZ
I have:
But no iPad? No direct experience with using an iPad; turning down the brightness outside then looking up?
Originally posted by pazcat
You say you had it down to 50% power, for what reason? Was it to protect the eyes? I don't really get why you would do that.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
how is the iPad's LCD display any different to other backlit displays, size not withstanding?
Originally posted by backinblack
I think it's great that you copped the same as everybody else does in here and DID go off topic with attacks on the poster..
Originally posted by RSF77
Looks like we are all human after all.edit on 14-12-2010 by RSF77 because: Except me of course, I'm a dog.
Originally posted by ChaosMagician
Originally posted by RSF77
Looks like we are all human after all.edit on 14-12-2010 by RSF77 because: Except me of course, I'm a dog.
omg what a beautiful doggie in your avatar... I used to have a dog similar to that. she was such a good girl.
are people in here still arguing about the authenticity of this sighting?