It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by burdenofdreams
So basically, what the OP is saying is:
1. Buy an iPad©.
2. Smoke Nat Sherman's™ cigarettes.
3. Get a Netflix® streaming account.
4. Download the SkyWalk™ app for your new ipad.
5. Buy a six-pack of Tecate™ beer.
6. Be sure to use Google Sky® on your new ipad.
And you, too, could have a UFO sighting.
Am I right?
Originally posted by Lowneck
After 22 largely off-topic pages, I'm keen to see CHRLZ's analysis of S.O.'s interesting sighting.
I think S.O. has posted enough details for CHRLZ to get started, making certain assumptions. Then S.O. could correct CHRLZ where necessary.
Originally posted by TheFlagHunter
OK then, instead of "delete" I'll just not sign in again, and cease posting - how's that?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Slow response ==> I live in Phoenix, weather was awesome, and it was the weekend.
Your screen-grab seems a bit off from my memory. My recollection is that Capella was about 2-3 degrees off vertical from Menkalinan to the south (right), and not as high in the sky.
However, nearby trees may have cause an optical illusion to make it seem as I remember.
Originally posted by torsion
Now I don't for one minute believe the claims of Adamski or Meier and many others but I'd consider an obvious craft as "classic".
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
This is perhaps the most confounding aspect of UFOlogy: accounts of this nature with no substantiation, but which do not contain sensationalist components and are essentially rather mundane observations of "lights" that move in unexplained ways.
Originally posted by torsion
Could it be that every claim of a close-up craft was a hoax or misidentification?
Originally posted by TheFlagHunter
Personally, I don't believe the OP. I think he made it up to get flags. I'm entitled to my personal opinion. And in my honest opinion, I think he is a liar.
Originally posted by torsion
We know that many of the vintage and famous saucer photos are fake, indeed, I know of none that could be classed as a definite genuine photo. Could it be that every claim of a close-up craft was a hoax or misidentification?
Originally posted by MiTS65
No other witnesses. No video. No photos. No radar reports. Just an anectdotal account.
That this thread reached 22 pages is an utter farce.
Perhaps the motivation for the site-owning OP was post counts and advertising revenue rather than stars and flags?