It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Then there are us "third campers" who would rather not sacrifice anyones liberty, but rather just use common sense risk management strategies.
Two black men walk into an interview with me. 1 wearing a polo and some dockers, the other in baggy jeans and a scarface shirt. Guess which one i will profile into not offering a job?
Originally posted by VictorVonDoom
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Then there are us "third campers" who would rather not sacrifice anyones liberty, but rather just use common sense risk management strategies.
Two black men walk into an interview with me. 1 wearing a polo and some dockers, the other in baggy jeans and a scarface shirt. Guess which one i will profile into not offering a job?
Depends, is the job roadie for a heavy metal band?
Risk of me being dead in 40 years? Probably 100%
Risk of people being subjected to random house searches in 40 years? The way things are going, the odds on that are looking pretty good, too.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
[
i will drink to that (and i don't drink....allergic to alchohol).
We would be better to abolish all laws enacted post 1800, and kind of just start over. Too many laws, too many non criminal activities criminalized. too many reasons to fear the police, armed with 600,000 laws with which to victimize the populace (usually in a municipal scam for additional monies outside of taxes via fines, most often applied to the lowest earning bracket).
You are an "it" getter.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by Dr. Strange
You sir, are what is wrong with people in this country.
I am, however, smart enough to see that what they are currently doing is largely reverse racial profiling done purely so they can make a huge public spectacle showing they're not racially profiling. Little old ladies, toddlers, and attractive women didn't kill Americans on 9/11... Doesn't mean that sometime in the future this may or may not change, but only a damn fool wastes resources, time, and money on slight possibilities of change within an event which is already among the longest of shots imaginable (terror attacks on planes? Thanks, but I'd rather bet on something more likely... like Powerball) .
Originally posted by Soshh
Such a move would fail to achieve anything other than making a particular section of the population feel even more discriminated against than usual, exacerbating the problem and creating others. If you announce that “we’re going to be looking for X, Y, Z” then the bad guys will make sure that their operatives do not fit X, Y, Z.
If racial profiling is introduced, it won’t be long until they are telling us that it is the whiteys that we should be leering at because they are very unlikely to be terrorists and therefore far more likely to be terrorists.
Originally posted by Dr. Strange
reply to post by Shadowfoot
I am not trying to lump all Muslims or Middle Easterners as terrorists. That was not my intention. I am just trying to say that if the terrorists such as AL Queda are of middle eastern origin, then doesn't it make sense to pay special attention to the people fitting that profile?
Originally posted by Dr. Strange
How quickly Americans forget that after Pearl Harbor, all Japanese people were rounded up and sent to detainment camps. Was that the right thing to do? That's not my place to say, but it did prevent any other attacks on American soil at that time.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
You can still enact policies that you don't then go announcing to the world, you know?