It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is also a well known fact that pediphiles use these camps for their hunting grounds....
Originally posted by elevatedone
my argument with this is still
YOU DON'T PUT CHILDREN IN A SITUATION WHERE SOMETHING COULD...
(let me say that again) COULD HAPPEN !!!
11-12-13-14 year olds do not need to be hanging ( no pun intended ) around 17-18 year olds and adults for that matter... IN THE NUDE !!!
Originally posted by Crysstaafur
It must be amazing how we can know so much about a particular lifestyle as if we have our own private satellites watching every move made. Please. The reality is most of us don't know a thing about this lifestyle, so who are we to judge them? It would be no different than some people judging Christians because they are a front for the NWO and are the real Satanists. Of course I wouldn't buy that either. Assumption, Arrogance and fear are the biggest mind killers.
Originally posted by spngsambigpants
The thing I don't get is people hating the ACLU for supporting the free speech of an organization or organizations that they don't agree with. I think NMBLA is disgusting, but they have a right for their voices to be heard, whether you agree with what they have to say or not. The ACLU is not supporting Boy/Man love, they are supporting NAMBLA's rights.
Further "no danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present," wrote Justice Brandeis in the case of Whitney versus California (1927), "unless the incidence of the evil is so imminent that it may befall before there is opportunity for full discussion." Thus the Holmes-Brandeis clear-and-present-danger formula is mainly a rule trying to determine the sufficiency of the evidence. According to this formula, before being allowed to punish a man for what he has said or written, the government has to clearly prove that his speech presents an imminent danger of a major substantive evil.
Originally posted by Bleys
Spngsambigpants brought up an interesting point about the ACLU's decision to represent NAMBLA.
Originally posted by spngsambigpants
I have struggled with the ACLUs decision to represent NAMBLA on this issue. I have tried to rationalize this as a first amendment case, but it's not.
They were wrong to accept.
NAMBLA's website calls for a change in laws, legalizing sex with children...it's never, ever going to happen. The ACLU calls this freedom of speech. I think they are dead wrong.
Originally posted by LadyV
It is also a well known fact that pediphiles use these camps for their hunting grounds....
But the sales don't appear to break the law, which delineates between non-sexual nudity and lewdness, said Pasco-Pinellas State Attorney Bernie McCabe...
Foley's office said his goal is more to shame Zadanoff than to punish him...
�In the case of AANR youth leadership camps, our caregivers include many of the parents themselves, in addition to screened volunteers. Most of these come from professions ranging from law enforcement to paramedics, nurses, and educators making them especially well suited to add to the safety and security of this experience. We have a staff to camper ratio of nearly two staff to supervise each of the campers, including many families who elect to come together� said Roche.
Parents are welcome to accompany these children to the summer camp. But just as parents are not required to attend scout, YMCA, sports or religious camps with their child, the government should not have the power to compel parental attendance if it interferes with a parents� decisions to choose when and with whom they will educate their children.
All parents care very deeply about the upbringing of their children and many are on the youth camp staff. In fact, for fourteen years, youth leadership camps have a totally unblemished record, thanks to the qualified people who give their time, as well as solid rules, security, and standards of conduct."
Originally posted by spngsambigpants
The thing I don't get is people hating the ACLU for supporting the free speech of an organization or organizations that they don't agree with. I think NMBLA is disgusting, but they have a right for their voices to be heard.
Zero, I do look at the average teenage girl walking around and pleased to say who needs a nudist camp?
Originally posted by slank
If you believe in God how could he have allowed for people to be born naked?
BEING NAKED IS NOT IMMORAL.
The reason the government should outlaw murder rape and robbery is because they interfer with the conducting of good business practices. It confers upon the marketplace a semblance of order and rules. The government should keep it's forays into morality to a bare minimum.