TSA gropes young boy's testicles while he is strip searched in front of everyone

page: 26
173
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 07:41 PM
link   
reply to post by LeTan
 


100% - thank you

At least some see the truth -

IQ's are called into question for most, but it is all a game of playing stupid from the highly paid psychological Israeli intelligence IT center!

And they are on every public forum and on every post - whether it is just commenting on an idea - (against/for Israel) or just giving a half million thumbs down one post at a time.

It really is becoming alarming - I am starting to see the truth/fact in the Alex Jones comment, "There's a war on for your mind"

There really is!
edit on 21-11-2010 by arizonascott because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 07:45 PM
link   
You people want to stop this...?
Simple...If and when you are traveling stop flying. If your traveling within this country hop in your car or on a bus or a train. We still have a choice to stop this but it takes people who are willing to change their ways to make the TSA change their ways as well. And yes I understand if you need to fly for a business it impossible to use other methods I'm talking about those who just use it for simple methods. If you want change start with yourself.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 07:46 PM
link   
edit on 21-11-2010 by Beavis because: bad post angry



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 07:48 PM
link   
Since the goal of the NWO is to de-industrialize the US and send jobs and manufacturing to countries with cheap labor and manufacturing costs to increase 'profits' for the multinational corporations primarily owned by the international banksters, it should make sense that part of the strategy would be to encourage travelers to avoid travelling through/to the US.

The TSA was preplanned to achieve the agenda and NAFTA was designed to ensure TSA came to being in the first place. Trillionares, the ones left out of the Fortune 100 richest folks who run the economies of the world and industries are merely a means to that end. Money is no impediment to those who wish to achieve their selfish, foolish objectives at the expense of their brethren/neighbor of which will fail in due time.

Resist, don't travel unless necessary, sue when appropriate, spread the truth, awaken folks in folkland not to be the subjects/slaves of the tyrants that be, of which will never find satisfaction in their own lives. Influence politicians, local authorities in the best way you know how.

The wealthy have their own personal aircraft therefor they are not 'subject' to the laws their 'benefactors and beneficiaries' lobby into being for their 'assumed' benefit at the peril of their neighbors. Their neighbors have become their worst enemy, by design. They will most likely spend the rest of their lives in hiding living in absolute paranoia until their piper is paid with their very soul. There is no happiness when the soul is subdued or 'worse', by design, an intelligent one.

If you 'act' as a slave/subject you will surely be treated as one.
One has choice either way, regardless of what side of the moat one may find themselves.
The TSA was founded on fraud and ill intention therefor should be abolished as soon as possible.
"Do unto others as you would have done unto you".
It doesn't even take an education, in the formal sense, to know this basic truth.
edit on 21-11-2010 by Perseus Apex because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 07:50 PM
link   
reply to post by nenothtu
 


Yes. Unreasonable search and seizure. Which isn't unreasonable since A) The airport is not your property and B) They have already stated quite fully cannot be brought across the security line. In addition! You have to consent to the search or scan. The whole consent is essentially why this argument would never hold in court.

The police can't just come in and search your house for no reason, but they can if you tell them that they can.
edit on 21-11-2010 by Miraj because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 07:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Perseus Apex
 


I would say act - act now against every faction controlling the US - starting with those ancient rich folks who think they can't be touched while running the EU and Trilateral Commission!



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 07:51 PM
link   
reply to post by ericsnow
 


This is very disgusting, down with TSA. they should burn in hell.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:01 PM
link   
Yes, the TSA are criminals and ALL of them that touch private parks should be arrested and tried for molestation the same as you would be if you did this.

Just as Benjamin Franklin said, "Those that give up Liberty for Protection Will Get Neither".

It's all a scam. Homeland Security was setup for the American people. All those defending them are SHILLS. Go look at their posts and you will see them pushing the government fairy tales on ALL topics.

Keep exposing TSA and our criminal government spraying us with Chemtrails, poisoning our water with Fluoride and radiation, the Vaccine scam, and all the other lies of the new world order. Ignore all Shills and go get 5000 friends on Facebook and post on ATS and every other website you can find! All those not fighting for Freedom are the SHILLS and the ignorant. Friend me up on ATS if you know who the SHILLS are.

peace



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:05 PM
link   
reply to post by arizonascott
 


The ones in 'charge' are human beings just as vulnerable as anyone else.
Often when one has too much money or assumed authority they tend to abuse these assumed privilages.
Neither parties in the end find satisfaction during or 'after' their foolishness.
If one or a consortium of folks choose to abuse their authority, power, wealth at the expense of their brethren, they will surely suffer those consequences in real time as that of the future.

Most of the so called elite do not respect their fellow man though they are often the very reason they've learned to lose this respect. Their 'funds' were not invested in their fellow man, the 'mind' of man; rather they 'chose' to invest their funds for the goals of personal self enrichment, power, authority and other foolish agendas.
When man attempts to play as a God among their fellow brethren, time and again they are to be as their own worst enemies, by design.

Oh, how folks have been deceived and continue to be so though things will change when folks, in considerable numbers, are aware of their place in society, or rather how they have been 'placed'.
edit on 21-11-2010 by Perseus Apex because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by vanhippi
He doesn't grope the boy does he.

When his hand moves round the front, he's rolling the kids t-shirt up to help him put it back on, no groping.

Still pretty bad, but don't make misleading titles as to get more views, the video is bad enough without you making things up.


Why did the boy have to take off his shirt???? What is the context of this video? How is it suddenly permissible to have a boy be made to take off his shirt in public and searched like that? Next we are going to have senior citizens have to remove their depends for a more though search.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:12 PM
link   
I know it has been stated before but it appears not enough people know the actual backstory to this.

The TSA did not 'strip' search this young man. The agent attempted to do a routine pat down of the boy. The boy would not cooperate, even the father attempted to calm the kid down and to help him stay still. When the father finally lost his patience, the father took the kid's shirt off and handed it to the agent. Once again, the TSA agent did not take the shirt off, nor did he ask for it to happen that way.

Once the security check was complete, the agent, not the father who stripped his own son, helped the boy put it back on. TSA at fault in this situation? Not so much. Father who stripped his son's shirt off in the middle of the airport? Let's just ask if you would have liked if your father had done this.

IS the TSA over stepping bounds currently, probably in some cases.

This is not one of those cases. This is a feeble attempt at disinformation. And I would say its successful with how many people here actually believed the title of the thread.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Perseus Apex
 


When you said parties - I stopped reading your reply!

Your either a "Free American" or you a foreign interest

Simple as that - the parties do not exist - even the two party system is a sham - it is only to gain 4-8 more years of "our" American destruction!

We are at an end!



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:16 PM
link   
The battle cry for the American Revolution was (Do Not Tread On Me) and maybe the protest slogan should be (Do Not Scan On Me) in order not to be scanned, touched inappropriately and X-rayed at our Nations airports. ^Y^



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by nenothtu
 


Yes. Unreasonable search and seizure. Which isn't unreasonable since A) The airport is not your property and B) They have already stated quite fully cannot be brought across the security line. In addition! You have to consent to the search or scan. The whole consent is essentially why this argument would never hold in court.


Part of the test for "reasonableness" is a warrant, the particulars of which are specified in the same amendment (the fourth). On the other hand, from a common sense viewpoint, if you think a strip search of a child is "reasonable", even WITH consent, given the circumstances that we are talking about (i.e. a US airport - this ain't Somalia), then I'm afraid you are already among the lost. Just lay down and do whatever the nice officer tells you - it's for your own good, eh? I'm sue if you are docile enough, and can persuade others well enough to also be docile, Big Brother will have a special, padded, set of slave chains made just for you.

The less docile among us will never see those chains. There is a lot to be said for dying as a free man, should it come to that. A free man can not be subjugated, he can only be killed. He will never be vanquished.

No, just REQUESTING consent for such a search doesn't fall under the heading of "reasonable". If you refuse consent, what do you think happens then? They just say "OK, you can go ahead and board" or "OK, you can just leave then"? I highly recommend you try that little exercise, and get yourself educated. First, though, read up on common misuses of "probable cause", and some of the novel interpretations out there, so you'll know what to expect next.

In response to point A), the Fourth Amendment does not specify that I must be on my own property to be secure from unreasonable searches. Your argument implies that, since the TSA can search anyone entering their "property", the airport, without probable cause, then I too can strip search anyone entering my house. I can think of a few government types who occasionally come to my house who might balk at that.



The police can't just come in and search your house for no reason, but they can if you tell them that they can.


Yes, but I thought we had already established in the first part of your post that we weren't talking about my house? The OP seems to be talking about the body of a child, which I certainly don't live in.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:18 PM
link   
I dont see any groping going on either. Pat downs suck but this thread is dis-information. The OP must be working with Jack Black....
Mis-Information Agent



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:18 PM
link   
reply to post by pavil
 


Exactly - it is called making an example - the fear now spreads against us - but not in the sense of terrorism which is why "all " of this was created - but in the sense of "LOCAL" control!

On everyone

We are all now enemies of the Fed/Globalists/TSA/Whoever - and none of us are free! Using this situation and who knows how many more like this in order to show their BS control and stop our freedom couldn't be any more relevant or of any more importance than slamming it in the face of "TRAVEL" !



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Mike.Ockizard
 


Dude - do you like being patted down? Feeling like a prisoner in progress? It is all mind conditioning for FEMA camps.

This is a kid - an "very" small American kid - what don't you understand?



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by casijones
 


To be completely honest.

Do you think that children aren't used to carry bombs and explosives..? think again!


The only thing more pathetic than a terrorist is somebody who is easily terrified.



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:24 PM
link   
reply to post by gimme_some_truth
 
"With all due respect, give me a break and quit trying to call everyone who disagrees with you a communist ( Even though North Korea has a Juche Socialist government)"


With all do respect back, read more than one of my post before you make a comment against me because a lot of what you're saying I said, I never said, and some of what I did say is contrary to what you're saying I did. I'll stop now as to not confuse you anymore. JEEEEZ


edit on 21-11-2010 by mtnshredder because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 21 2010 @ 08:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by arizonascott
reply to post by Mike.Ockizard
 


Dude - do you like being patted down? Feeling like a prisoner in progress? It is all mind conditioning for FEMA camps.

This is a kid - an "very" small American kid - what don't you understand?


I dont understand how, by watching a poor quality video where you cant see whats really going on, the OP can deduce that the boys genitals are being groped. Like I said, pat-downs suck but exagerrating what happened to make that point is un-necessary. He could have just as easily said "5 year old made to remove shirt during security check" but not that many people would have been incensed enough to respond.





new topics
top topics
 
173
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join