Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Sarah Palin Says She Could Beat Obama

page: 3
10
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 10:06 AM
link   
just as paul teaches, just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should do something. and i paraphrase. i wish her the best for her and her family. but i don't wish her to be in the white house. her polarizing effect is not necessarily helping the repubs, and does a disservice to the tea party and alaskans in general




posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 11:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
It would be interesting to see her try. I don't think the GOP would allow her the nomination, but it would be fun to watch!


I think Palin winning the GOP's nomination, would be the dumbest thing they could possibly do. In my opinion it would be giving Obama the keys to four more years.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Fox Molder
Here's mu thought on it.

She has southern values with a western charm. She believes in freedom of speech and the right to bare arm. She'll all for taking the government out of the free market and the renationalisation of enterprise and family values. She want's people to stop depending on hand outs and start doing stuff on their own.

Now of course their is always some political bull# here and there but the above are truly her core values. I see nothing wrong with those values, in fact I for one would love to see all of those values in the White house for ones.

Now...As far as political experience is concerned, hell do you thing Reagan had that much experience, no, yet most Americans are happy to have had him a President. I say, if she can manage the home wallet and he family the way she does maybe she can manage the Government wallet and it's cabinets and make something out of the crap that is in place now.


I don't think most people were happy with Reagan. He was the first president to start financial deregulation and hiring Goldman Sachs people as "advisors"...just look where it brought us.

Are you seriously gonna vote for this??



Notice how she supports the bailouts in those videos


You have to be really brainwashed to listen to her factless slogans.
edit on 18-11-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 11:50 AM
link   
I don't think Terror Sarah could beat her
way out of a paper bag. just sayin

I wouldn't vote for her
and none in my family would either.

She reminds me of those air-headed
females in the movies that blow
bubble gum bubbles so huge that it burst
all over their face.

no thanks on Terror Sarah
but i would vote for Ron Paul.
Course saying that just got me
on the terror watch list again.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 12:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Fox Molder
Here's mu thought on it.

She'll all for taking the government out of the free market and the renationalisation of enterprise and family values. She want's people to stop depending on hand outs and start doing stuff on their own.

Now of course their is always some political bull# here and there but the above are truly her core values. I see nothing wrong with those values, in fact I for one would love to see all of those values in the White house for ones.

Now...As far as political experience is concerned, hell do you thing Reagan had that much experience, no, yet most Americans are happy to have had him a President. I say, if she can manage the home wallet and he family the way she does maybe she can manage the Government wallet and it's cabinets and make something out of the crap that is in place now.




Right Americans do nothing on their own, it is such a bloody problem


Palin and Republicans will manufacture the perfect loopholes to create MORE rape and pillage, they will not dismantle the enter regulatory structure of anything, they will do just enough to excel the corporatism.

And Ronnie be good with the check book???

No wonder we are screwed

I hope Palin wins, we deserve it



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 12:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrXYZ

Originally posted by Fox Molder
Here's mu thought on it.

She has southern values with a western charm. She believes in freedom of speech and the right to bare arm. She'll all for taking the government out of the free market and the renationalisation of enterprise and family values. She want's people to stop depending on hand outs and start doing stuff on their own.

Now of course their is always some political bull# here and there but the above are truly her core values. I see nothing wrong with those values, in fact I for one would love to see all of those values in the White house for ones.

Now...As far as political experience is concerned, hell do you thing Reagan had that much experience, no, yet most Americans are happy to have had him a President. I say, if she can manage the home wallet and he family the way she does maybe she can manage the Government wallet and it's cabinets and make something out of the crap that is in place now.


I don't think most people were happy with Reagan. He was the first president to start financial deregulation and hiring Goldman Sachs people as "advisors"...just look where it brought us.

Are you seriously gonna vote for this??



Notice how she supports the bailouts in those videos


You have to be really brainwashed to listen to her factless slogans.
edit on 18-11-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)


YES - its like the NFL

go $#@$$# team!!!

Brought to you by Viagra



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 12:17 PM
link   




Imo the attempt at exorcism failed...loved the sound effects though
edit on 18-11-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 12:18 PM
link   
at this point anyone even I could beat Obama in 2012. This mans approval raiting suxs arse.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 12:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 



All these years I here " we need someone that knows what real life is all about" Well damn it she's as close as you are going to get! No one in the political arena is closer to grass roots as her, NO ONE comes close to living a real live as in every day life like going out and getting the groceries, hunting, fishing, cleaning the damn house and doing her own laundry....Come on...You can't get closer to real life than that. You might not agree with her politics and that's fine but the stats that you are pulling up are bull and you know it. Welfare state...Hummmm is that per capitat...Huuuhhh...NOPE. Getting Government out of free market and in to your personal life...Wow....Where is she going to tell you what to do, because she is anti abortion you thing your 14 year old daughter won't be able to buy condoms and get an abortion when she get's knocked up, that will be the Governments fault, right...Cause no you can not take responsibility in educating your own kid on sex and it's responsibilities you'd rather the Government allow free abortions and liberal approved pot houses and needle exchange programs. Come on now...Put your damn pant on and stop your Liberal Allah Government knows best crap. Use that brain of yours and get back to common sense.

Tell me this...If your Obama is so damn great......Explain to me how you pay off your dept by borrowing and printing money thus devaluing the currency on a global scale ?

When you pay off your mortgage, do you pay with your credit card ??? Same logic here .....It's flawed!!!

Get Government out of everyday life.....Period. Every time you vote Liberal you vote away your constitution bit by bit all because you are to damn lazy to take responsibility for your own action and would rather rely on big brother knows best and let them pass ever so chocking liberty rights.......In 30 years you will wonder how the U.S. got so damn socialist, that's if you are lucky, or even worst, the elected and willing dictatorship !!!!

God speed !



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


Deregulation is not a bad thing at all...It the people that don't educate themselves and make the right choice.


Perfect example is the real estate market. Yes the bank are allowed to lent you 100% and in some States 115% of the evaluation on a home. Plus you are offered the possibility of paying interest only on the mortgage their for never paying any capital on the loan.
I see nothing wrong with the possibility of a bank offering that, non at all. BUT if the market crashes and you are already financed to the gills....Well....you know what happens.

Who is a fault here......Liberals will say the Banks because they should know better that to offer you this deal.....Hummm...Wait a minute here....The banks fault...Ok...Who's the idiot that signed the contract, that didn't do their homework before shopping for a house, that assumed that the market would forever be climbing...Let's see.....The guy that's mortgaging more than he can afford? The guy that decided that he would sell the house in a year and make a profit? The guy that after a year of great real estate market rise decided to get greedy and wait another year and make even more money...??? LOL...See....It's the banks fault !!!! LOL

You are being lead the the edge of the cliff by your Sheppard...Wake up because the Sheppard knows damn well the wolves are waiting bellow the cliff.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 12:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Fox Molder
 


You totally overlook the fact that those idiots can bring down the entire economy, therefore harming EVERYONE, not just themselves. I didn't buy a house I couldn't afford, I didn't buy cars I couldn't afford...but I DID lose my job because some idiots did. Why was that possible? DEREGULATION!

Since Reagan, this allowed corporations systematically to dismantel our rights and protection. In 1976, the top 1% in the US banked 9% of total GDP. This percentage has risen to 24% now!! Wealth hasn't been as unequally distributed since before the great depression. Where did the money we created go since Reagan? Well, 4/5ths went to the top 1%. In addition, corporations now have rights like individuals. The whole "less taxes" and easier life for corporations because it trickles down to the "regular people" theory is total hogwash...but sadly it's what Palin and a lot of her "friends" advocate. Free market works in THEORY, but it assumes people act rationally, which as we know, ISN'T THE CASE!

Look, I'm not arguing that the stupid people are at fault for buying stuff they couldn't afford. I worked as a head fund manager (real estate division) before the crisis, I've seen PLENTY of bad investments being made. And I don't feel sorry for those people who lost money because they made stupid decisions. BUT, it's not fair or just that people who had no part in this suffer now. What about the small corner shop around the corner who now desperately needs a renovation, but because some idiots destroyed the banking system he can't get a loan now? He did nothing wrong, but idiots ruined his shop and are costing him money.

You are falling for Palin the puppet. Just like many politicians (Rep/Dem/TP) she's nothing but a puppet using dumbed-down slogans to trick the people into believing she's "one of them". You claim she's doing groceries herself, doing the laundry, fishing, hunting...like you. Tell me, which % of Americans fishes and hunts?? It's a small minority, and the rest just buy into the "pretty picture" of a "typical American life" as they believe it SHOULD be. She's quit her job as governor early because she realized she could make more money elsewhere. Money is what keeps her going, and believing otherwise just shows how naive you are.

So you believe she represents you??

- The right is all in favour of extending tax cuts for the rich, but blocked a bill earlier this year that would have resulted in tax cuts for the middle class (aka the majority).
- The right blocked a bill that would have prevented off-shore companies to evade US taxes. That money would have been used to help 911 first responders who still suffer from illnesses years after the event!!

The only reason to vote for her is if you're:

A) A dumb brainwashed sheep who doesn't care about content and only responds to buzz words related to "fishing" or "god".
B) Rich
C) A corporation
D) Straight
E) Ignorant about facts

Having said that, I seriously hope she runs as president in 2012 because it would make Jon Stewart's job so much easier


The fact remains, it's this deregulation that also gave rise to strong lobbyists. It's what caused politicians to no longer work for the people, but rather for corporations. Look how great that worked out for us...
edit on 18-11-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 01:25 PM
link   
reply to post by guohua
 


She would not have a prayer of beating Obama nor getting the Republican nomination and she knows it. What she is doing is keeping her hat in the ring to get the republicans to take the tea party agenda and not dump it by threatening to run, perhaps as an independant, hence ensuring Obama's victory.

Despite what most folks think, Palin is smart. She is managing her image and keeping herself in the limelight better than a movie star. She is pulling in major coin and is going to do exactly what she is doing to continue to do that. She will do her bit on Fox News, give the speaches, write another book and in a few years get a TV show on fox and perhaps a radio gig where she will make serious dough.

Even if I'm wrong, there is no way that even 40% of the voting public will buy her home-spun nonsense. A commercial with Palin sitting across the table from Putin would pretty much say it all.

You can believe that there are folks in Iran, China and Russia praying (albiet to different gods) for Palin to get the job.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 01:40 PM
link   
There was a time when the Presidency was looked at as a position that required one of the Nation's best and brightest. Does Sarah Palin immediately come to mind when using that thought process?

She's likable, she's one of us, she's kinda cute & makes an interesting subject to fill air time on a reality show. Is she the leader of the Free World? Really?
edit on 18-11-2010 by ethancoop because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 01:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Becoming
She won't win the party nomination if she does run, so it wouldn't matter. I read a poll a few days ago that said that Romney would beat him and she would be trounced by double digits.

More power to her if she decides to run. If she does win the party nomination I will give her the same courtesy I will give Obama and listen to what they have to say and give my vote to the person I feel is most deserving.


You are kidding, right?

Don't you have any love or care for your country?



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 01:58 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 



To answer your questions:
B) Rich...Hell almost....and I work damn hard to make every penny
C) A corporation...Well, no but I am a business owner.
D) Straight, yep. wife and kids living the dream.


When the market crashed, I adapted and overcame, I didn't go to my bank to re finance or rely on my government to bail me out.

Banks crashed because of #ty investments and a majority of stupid people believing every work the bank manager threw at them. If I throw you your favorite lolly pop and it's covered in #, will you take it anyways ?



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 01:58 PM
link   
The simple fact that the left siding MSN continue to hound her and follow her EVERY move is proof positve they think she can beat him too.

If she really was the putz they attempt to make her out be they wouldn't print a word.

Fear. It is amzing to watch.



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 01:59 PM
link   
reply to post by guohua
 

Palin Says She Is Seriously Considering Entering Race in 2012.

ITS BAD ENOUGH WE HAD A [C- EDUCATED], CRACK HEAD PRESIDENT FOR 8 YEARS ,NOW ITS A POSSIBILITY THAT OUR FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT IS....THIS.. SARAH THING.

I WONDER WHY REPUBLICANS ALWAYS BIRTH THE TRASHIEST HUMANS ON EARTH.

WHEN THE AIRPLANES HIT THE TOWER ,IT WASN'T THAT GEORGE WAS TO DUMB TO GET UP AND DO SOMETHING...HE WAS SO HIGH AND DRUNK,HE JUST COULDN'T MOVE.

We go from a c- EDUCATED crack head, drunk president BUSH, To a president with Yale standards ,now back down to this thing palin, that doesn't know anything about politics or her family,and clearly has no family values.

This world is stupid with stupid retarded people.
WHO IN THERE RIGHT MIND WOULD VOTE THAT NASTY WOMAN IN OFFICE.












edit on 18-11-2010 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)
edit on 18-11-2010 by Immortalgemini527 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 02:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Fox Molder
 


So you are saying the actions of an idiot minority (those who made bad investments) should be allowed to bring down entire economies and make the majority suffer...correct?

Happy you are getting through the crisis ok, a large part of the country isn't and it's not because of their fault. I'm lucky enough to be ok too...I haven't worked in 2 years, and don't have to for another 8-10yrs unless I want to. That doesn't mean I agree with an idiot minority being allowed to exploit the majority for short-term gains.

Oh, and you do realize Palin was in favor of the bailouts until it was clear she wouldn't become VP, right?
edit on 18-11-2010 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 02:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
 



IMMORTAL, these are the same people thaT VOTED A CRACK HEAD, C- EDUCATED PRESIDENT IN OFFICE.LOL,



posted on Nov, 18 2010 @ 02:35 PM
link   
The question is, can America stand her as POTUS for 2 years? (not to worry, she will quit halfway through in order to be a better servent of the country or whatever she said she did)





new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join