It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seventytwo
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
You know... I thought it was about ATS working hard on this site to make it a better place They were spending their own time and money to broadcast a story that actually happened? The NORAD prediction was an hoax but the NYC incident occurred, why should we ignore it? Why don't you ignore it? Balloons or mercury alien flying plasma machines.. who cares? many witnesses reported it, some media reported it.... So why is it wrong for ATS report it? just asking because I'm seriously confused
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by 0ne10
I turned the video off right when they claimed the 10/13 prediction was accurate.
ATS is spreading inaccurate rumors now I guess?edit on 16-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)
I find it terribly disappointing that ATS is covering this hoax and giving it air time that it clearly does not deserve.
IRM
Originally posted by 0ne10
I turned the video off right when they claimed the 10/13 prediction was accurate.
ATS is spreading inaccurate rumors now I guess?edit on 16-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by Seventytwo
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
You know... I thought it was about ATS working hard on this site to make it a better place They were spending their own time and money to broadcast a story that actually happened? The NORAD prediction was an hoax but the NYC incident occurred, why should we ignore it? Why don't you ignore it? Balloons or mercury alien flying plasma machines.. who cares? many witnesses reported it, some media reported it.... So why is it wrong for ATS report it? just asking because I'm seriously confused
Seventytwo.....
I view your comments as fair & reasonable.
Your reply clearly expresses the "other" side of the argument.
Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by Thunder heart woman
the only thing I see changing on ATS is... MORE negativity than ever before.
No wonder the ET's won't land.
Originally posted by j.douglas
reply to post by Seventytwo
Yes, we would love to interact with memebers. As we continue to build the show, we would like to have a section where members can vote on threads and pieces of the show. Please send give us your thoughts and suggest topics for future episodes. Thank you for checking us out and being interested in the show.
-J. Douglas
"Act against inaction"
Originally posted by AlexthegreatNYC
Hi new member here, wait at 4:20 aren't UFOS "undentified flying objects" and why would she say they aren't. she said " are they actually UFOS".edit on 17-10-2010 by AlexthegreatNYC because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
Dear 0ne10,
The team members did not claim that the 10-13 prediction was accurate.
Two years ago retiered Air Force officer Stanley Fulham published a book in 2008 called "Challenges of Change" where he stated that there would be tentative massive UFO sightings on October 13, 2010. With him being so accurate, is this really a UFO sighting or is it some kind of government op.?
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
I took the time to read all that because I know how much effort and callories you spent putting into it.