Some masonic secrets for the masses, page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 6-10-2010 @ 07:26 PM by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by Jagedline
If I was Christian, this point can't be reconciled, it is wrong and I have to accept it as such.


How would/did you handle this if it should arise? What would you do if the person you planned on marrying asked you to take wedding vows?

Just because your friends have no issue with it, this does not make this okay in the eyes of their creator does it?


I suppose this is up to their personal interpertation of the Bible. I have seen many people infer different meanings from the same passages. In the end, however, it is not my concern as their own spirituality is not for me to judge.

You took the oath correct?


Yes.

If so you swore that you would not reveal the secrets. If you do reveal the secrets what is the punishment? Rather brutal isn't it?


It is also revealed to the candidate, prior to taking said oaths, that they are strictly symbolic. I do not expect someone to come along and sever my body in twain.

If we stick to the Christian religion, isn't the human body considered a "Temple of God" ? If it is, does the Christian have the right or authority to allow another to desecrate that Temple?


If the person understands that the oaths are purely symbolic then I believe they have no fear of their 'Temple' being desecrated.

The above is another example of the contradictions I mentioned. Of course you might say that you took the oath BUT no one would ever dream of following through with the punishment.


No one ever has had the punishment applied to them for breaking the oaths. It is soley your conscience which bears the burden of breaking your obligation.

If one is truly a Christian how do they resolve these issues?


Not being one I can not truthfully answer that. There are other Masons who post here who are and I am sure they would be happy to answer that question for you.

Maybe I am just intolerant and a fundamentalist. It must be that the Bible is a book of suggestions not the Word of God.


Your own adherence to the Bible is your perogative and I do not look down on anyone who chooses to follow it more loosely or closely. It is their intolerance of myself and others that I find troublesome.


reply posted on 6-10-2010 @ 07:27 PM by network dude
reply to post by Jagedline



as many have said, your beliefs are for you alone. It's not my place to judge them. I consider myself a Christian as I believe Jesus Christ is the son of God and he died so that I may go to heaven. But I don't think that every story in the Bible is absolute fact. If you want to discuss some of the more "angry God" stories that's fine, but My God is a loving God. I think a lot of things have been perverted for the sake of control. Those are my beliefs. I don't have any problem with the oaths I took. When I asked God if he minded, he didn't strike me down or anything, so I have to assume he is cool with it as well. We do talk often. He is a real nice guy. It's OK to not like the way someone thinks, but it's best to let them find their own truth and help them when they ask. At least that is how is works best for me.


reply posted on 6-10-2010 @ 07:28 PM by Jagedline
reply to post by network dude





not that you will care, as you are just as obstinate as we are about your beliefs I am sure. But the oaths we take are to ourselves.


The oath you take is supposedly bound by the Holy Book of your belief. If you happen to be Christian there is a conflict between the oath and your claimed belief. Whether you break it or not is of no consequence, it is the act of the oath that I am questioning. If the Bible says it is wrong, how can you, me or anyone make it right?



reply posted on 6-10-2010 @ 10:29 PM by KSigMason
reply to post by Dr Cosma


Freemasonry has men from all walks of life as members. We also have students, teachers, medical personnel, soldiers, lawyers, media figures, and so on. Our jobs have nothing to do with our standing in the Fraternity and the Fraternity has no affect on our employment either.

reply to post by rebeldog


What do you consider a high level Mason? Are you one that has the tunnel vision person and think that the numbering system of the Scottish Rite means its superior? That would be a illogical conclusion on your part.

reply to post by Dr Cosma


Here is a nice little read on your transparency comment:

12. To dispel accusations of secretiveness, shouldn't Freemasonry be required to be more transparent?

No.

First, a distinction has to be made between "secretive" which implies wrongdoing, and "secret" which simply means private. Freemasons are private citizens who believe in all peoples' right to privacy.

As regards transparency, Freemasonry is not a public organization; it is a private society composed of private citizens who exercise that freedom of association and right to privacy enjoyed by all private citizens in western nations. Privacy is a fundamental human right recognized in the UN Declaration of Human Rights (10 December 1948), the International Convenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), and in many other international and regional treaties. For example, Canadians are protected by the Personal Information Privacy Act (13 April 2000) while Australians are protected by the Privacy Act 1988 (See ISBN 978-1-877079-60-3).

That said, the names of elected leaders of masonic jurisdictions are often posted on their websites and contact information is often posted outside lodgehalls. Information is published about their philanthropic work, and friends and relatives are often invited to attend lodge functions. Where freemasons have formed charitable or property holding societies, these bodies file all documentation regarding officers and finances as is required by law.

SOURCE



reply posted on 6-10-2010 @ 10:55 PM by KSigMason
reply to post by rebeldog


I've received a few home visits. In fact a good friends and fellow Past Master stopped by, but he is also my Treasurer in the Lodge of Research, Secretary/Recorder in the York Rite bodies, Past Governor of the College, President of the OHP Chapter, last year's General Chairman of the York Rite Grand Session, and Grand Governor of Idaho, YRSCNA. I had to audit his books and exchange stamps for next year's Grand Session.

reply to post by rebeldog


Man, you're assuming a lot of things that you do not really know about.

Originally posted by Sp33d
Out of curiosity...how does one become a mason?

You ask one.

reply to post by Vincitori


Ummm...the head of the Lodge is not the "Head Wizzard", it's called the Worshipful Master. Also, I didn't realize OJ was Jewish. Also, I looked around and found no reference to OJ nor Judge Lance being Masons.

reply to post by Masonic Light


Outstanding summary of the Scottish Rite
edit on 6-10-2010 by KSigMason because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 7-10-2010 @ 09:55 AM by JoshNorton
Originally posted by Jagedline
Christians (in this discussion) can not have their cake and eat it too. If they are religious, they can not pick and choose what applies like they are at buffet line.
You should read
The Year of Living Biblically. A guy went for a whole year trying to live by ALL the rules in the Bible, just to see if it could be done today... No wearing clothes of mixed fibers; no shaving; must throw stones at adulterers; must not touch a woman who's menstruating; etc.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



ATS Banner! !?! <--- EXPLAIN THYSELVES...
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags
Freemasons, the Illuminati and the American Revolution
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
What is this ring from? Masonic or other private group?
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
On the Subject of Riches
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
The Missing link to every secret society
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Masonic Pouch?
  Posted 13 days ago with 3 member flags
Are there any real spooks on here?
  Posted 3 days ago with 3 member flags