It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history. Over 60 million people were killed. The tables below give a detailed country-by-country count of human losses.
Originally posted by NewlyAwakened
I agree with the OP on the principle that there should not be any historical Sacred Cows. Everything should be open to question and revision. The fact that anyone who questions anything about this particular event in history is ostracized or in some countries jailed is ridiculous.
That being said, I have not seen any reason to doubt that millions of Jews were deliberately exterminated.
What I do doubt is that that was the plan all along. I think more likely the Nazis wanted to kick them out, like a Trail-of-Tears-style forced migration somewhere outside of Germany proper. Things probably went south when the war started raging and they became strained economically, and Germany had a hard time feeding its own people let alone its prisoners. This is not the first time this has happened; look at pictures of Union POWs in Confederate camps (particularly Andersonville prison camp, one image linked below) toward the end of the Civil War; it's sometimes hard to tell the difference between them and a Nazi victim.
upload.wikimedia.org...
Eventually the Nazis took an "ends justify the means" approach and just figured they'd cut off the excess baggage. I don't deny that the extermination of the Jews was a deliberate decision, but simply saying "Hitler was crazy and hated the Jews so he decided to kill them" prevents us from analyzing the pressures that led to that decision. It doesn't mean the decision wasn't evil, but moral judgements are dead ends for the historian. The historian is interested in the sequence of events and how A led to B.
I also agree that the Allies had every reason in the world to harp on the war crimes of the Nazis, to distract attention from the millions of civilians they killed at Dresden, Hamburg, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, etc. When you hear about World War II war crimes, you think Holocaust, and that's just fine and dandy for Allied leaders like "Bomber" Harris and Harry Truman who ordered some very controversial actions.
Every side in that conflict was drenched in innocent blood.
edit on 21-9-2010 by NewlyAwakened because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by seagull
Do you honestly equate the bombings of all of those cities with the Holocaust? Seriously?
That all were horrific is the only common ground they have.
The Holocaust was an effort by the Nazi regime, and its puppets, to eradicate entire groups of people in the name of racial purity, or words to that effect.
Those bombings were, however mistaken and horrific some may find them, done in an effort to end a grusomely cataclysmic war.
Originally posted by seagull
I couldn't careless whether you have Jewish friend or not. It doesn't matter. What matters is the reason behind looking into the Holocaust. Why? Ask yourself that.
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by 19872012
What's your reason for debating the Holocaust? Why are you debating the Holocaust? There is no taboo is discussing the Holocaust save the agenda behind it. Are you discussing it to learn of the event? No taboo. Are you discussing it in some misguided attempt to rehabilitate the opinions held about Nazi's in general, Hitler and his sycophants in particular? That's the taboo. Are you discussing it as a way to somehow prove the Jews had it coming... That's the taboo.
The Holocaust itself? Nothing taboo about it, other than the fact it happened at all.
So. Ask yourself why are you, or others, discussing it? There's where the "taboo" comes into play.
Originally posted by seagull
Insinuating? Not a thing. Only you can answer the why of it. Searching for answers is what we all do, in one shape, or form.
What ever your reasons are will come out with your words, and/or actions.
Originally posted by 19872012
IMO, it's ridiculous to think the Nazis didn't kill anyone in camps AT ALL (it's like thinking the planes were holograms on 9/11), but is it really wrong just to question the official history? Isn't calling all holocaust revisionists anti-Semitic the same as calling 9/11 truthers anti-American?
By official, I mean that: Hitler hated Jews, there was nobody behind the events other than Hitler and the Nazis, and 6 million or close to that many Jewish people were exterminated because of their ethnicity.
It's obvious Hitler did hate Jews, or at least he used the German people's hatred of Jews at the time to gain power. I do think there was an element of Zionist treason in the planning of the Holocaust to make an excuse to form Israel and keep Biblical prophecy. I find the numbers on the other hand, questionable. I'm pretty certain more than 1 million Jewish people died, but were they killed only by Nazis, or by the Russians as well? Why have the numbers been changed so many times?