It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Varemia
I'm just curious as to how exactly you expect anyone to accomplish another investigation of 9/11. Do you want them to go over all the footage again, reviewing every detail, performing test after test after test (which they did in the NIST investigation)?
Did you know that the investigation would cost money? (GASP, I know!) Guess where the money comes from? Our pockets. Guess how much NIST spent in its investigation when the attack was still important to the government in determining why the towers collapsed? Millions of dollars!
So you would rather scrap the entire multi-million dollar investigation by NIST, cost tax payers millions, and likely have the investigators come to the exact same conclusion as before; all so you can feel better about 9/11. Though, I'm sure an investigation wouldn't do it. You'd just say it was government agents all over again. You would have to have some bias-minded engineers do the research, looking only for things they can compare to their idea and considering the rest to be just random happenstance.
...
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Devino
The molten material, for example, is evidence of something
No, the "molten material", not having been identified is proof of nothing.
There is not in fact a single shred of evidence for any cd at the WTC, The Towers plainly collapsed from the plane impact points
...
In the whole site not a trace of any demolition paraphernalia has been discovered and, of course, not a soul has admitted to having any knowledge of or taking part in rigging the buildings.
What gets me is that I keep hearing all this talk about evidence of CD, and how the office fires burning underground for weeks couldn't have possibly gotten hot enough...
Yet, I haven't seen ONE poster come up with a list of possible actual explosives that could have been used.
I'm just curious as to how exactly you expect anyone to accomplish another investigation of 9/11. Do you want them to go over all the footage again, reviewing every detail, performing test after test after test (which they did in the NIST investigation)?
Did you know that the investigation would cost money? (GASP, I know!) Guess where the money comes from? Our pockets.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Don't forget, the first responders who actually worked the pile also saw molten steel:
Since firefighters are in the firefighting business, I think we can reasonably assume that they know what they're talking about when it comes to anything burning or melting.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Devino
Thermite was pretty much debunked.
1) themite has relative low energy density
2) heat from local thermite charges would easily be dissipated by the rest of the columns without melting them
3) there is no evidence of massive thermite reactions
4) it does not make sense to use massive thermite reactions if you want to demolish a building discretely, especially when it can be done with small amounts in strategic positions.
But I guess similar arguments can be used for any kind of explosive. You just cant have an enormous release of thermal energy in a very short time without having any visible signs of it.
Originally posted by aliengenes
would not have had the ability to liquefy 6" solid steel beams.
Conclusion As this simplified summary of the findings of the paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe shows, the distinctive red-gray chips found consistently in dust samples from the destroyed Twin Towers are clearly an advanced engineered pyrotechnic material. It is not even remotely possible that the material could have been formed spontaneously through any random process such as the total destruction of the Twin Towers. Nor is it possible that the material was present in the Towers for some innocent reason.
What I am basically saying is that the amount of thermite needed in order to get pools of molten steel in the debris is so incredibly huge that it seems very unlikely.