It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The TPM is just a bunch of GOP members that want to appear independent. Follow the money; the TPM wouldn't even exist if it weren't for these Republican supporters.
tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com...
However this TPM thing could blow up in the conservatives face if it scares the moderates enough to get out the vote and some of these TPM folk are a few bricks shy of a load imo. Perhaps not enough to cave in the entire movement but make it so impotent that it's nothing more than fodder for TV comedians. Sort of like it is now.
Originally posted by mishigas
This is what I mean. You totally ignore the results the TPM has achieved in their short existence.
I am genuinely interested. What have they achieved? All I see them doing is getting one Republican closer to losing in a general election than another. I guess I do not understand how backing the GOP is bringing about any change?
Originally posted by mishigas
Backing the GOP?
They are constantly fighting the GOP.
They have endorsed little known candidates with conservative values against the party machine, and they have won the primaries, time after time. They have pushed conservatism, smaller government, less taxes, abiding by the Constitution as main values. Their message is resonating throughout America and is bringing people to the polls. That is the American way, and it should be encouraged instead of denigrated.
As far as what happens on Nov. 2, we'll just have to wait and see.
Originally posted by mishigas
Backing the GOP?
They are constantly fighting the GOP.
With other GOP candidates. How does that turn out?
Everything else you said sounds really nice but unfortunately it is just stuff you said. Which Republicans that they are pushing are not Republicans again?
Originally posted by mishigas
Or with Independents, or Libertarians, or others.
Originally posted by mishigas
Or with Independents, or Libertarians, or others.
But I see your point. Any GOP candidate = BAD. Any DEMOCRAT candidate = GOOD.
Very simple and easy to understand. Higher logic not required.
Everything I said is what most Americans believe and stand by. And that is the simple truth that will bury the Democratic party in November.
And what was so inherently bad about a candidate being GOP again?
All I see are Republicans being backed by the tea parties. As for independents? I hardly see failed Republican candidates turn 'independent' as 'politically independent'.
Apparently not. My point is only about the Tea Party fooling itself and people like you be pretending to be looking for something new but just pushing Republicans.
Very simple and easy to understand. Higher logic not required.
Give it a shot just for fun. Try it using the things I actually wrote and see if you come to a different conclusion, an accurate one.
And what was so inherently bad about a candidate being GOP again?
What is different about it?
Originally posted by mishigas
Who says we have to be looking for a new way to butter bread? Sticking to good old solid conservative principles is all we ask.
I was referring to your logic. You seem to have a severe case of the ass for Republicans for some reason.
A perfect example of what I meant about your logic.
Originally posted by mishigas
Well, these are the primaries, where the winning candidate will run in the general election, right? You'll likely see Indy's, etc., in the general election.
s this the logic I am missing? The Tea Party is backing Republicans in the primaries just to ditch them and go support some independent that has not shown up yet? So you think they were behind career Republican O'Donnell just so they can then support and independent to run against her? Can you help me out with this "logic."
Is this your way of admitting the Tea Party is a farce and just another way to support Republicans while pretending to be independant? Last time I checked the whole point of the Tea Party was that they wanted CHANGE. How is backing the same old Reps going to achieve that?
Originally posted by mishigas
You are missing the point, or you don't know how elections work in the US.
In a primary election, each party chooses it's ultimate candidate. Republicans do NOT run against Democrats or Indy's at this point in time. It's a race to see which R is the candidate in the general election. So you are really confused, and I can see why.
I don't know where you're 'checking', but the message you're bringing back is wrong.
Backing the same old Reps? As in O'Donnell vs Castle? You really are confused.
You seem to be very afraid of the TPM, as evidenced by your need to denigrate them at every opportunity with lies and falsehoods. You say things like "Last time I checked the whole point of the Tea Party was that they wanted CHANGE", and then you want me to defend that? Jesus man, grow up. Talk issues, and stop grasping at straws.
Originally posted by Alxandro
Whether you happen to be an Independent, a Republican or a Democrat, what could be so wrong with that concept?
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
The talk from the tea party candidates are no different than what many of the established Republican candidates stated... 'anti-establishment, anti-tax, anti (enter name here).
Originally posted by sweetliberty
It seems they are supporting her after all.
Originally posted by whaaa
However this TPM thing could blow up in the conservatives face if it scares the moderates enough to get out the vote ...
The Contract lists 10 agenda items that it encourages congressional candidates to follow:[64][65]
1. Identify constitutionality of every new law:
2. Reject emissions trading: Stop "cap and trade"
3. Demand a balanced federal budget:
4. Simplify the tax system: Adopt a simple and fair single-rate tax system
5. Audit federal government agencies for constitutionality:
6. Limit annual growth in federal spending
7. Repeal the health care legislation passed on March 23, 2010:
8. Pass an 'All-of-the-Above' Energy Policy: Authorize the exploration of additional energy reserves
9. Reduce Earmarks: Place a moratorium on all earmarks
10. Reduce Taxes: Permanently repeal all recent tax increases, and extend current temporary reductions in income tax, capital gains tax and estate taxes, currently scheduled to end in 2011. (53.38%)
But parties have clear leaders who can attempt to synthesize the differences between leaders and attempt to rein in the centrifugal forces with the parties.
The Tea Party movement has no such feature and that could eventually cause it to become even more inchoate than it already is.