It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Most buildings have areas for storing flammable cleaning material and other types of chemicals in and maybe these exploded under the compression of the collapse?
Originally posted by Aristophrenia
As much as I feel there was dodgey dealings surrounding 911 - I am significantly more terrified of what would happen if the truth ever came out - America would tear itself apart - it would be devastating.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by PersonalChoice
What do you see?
It's not what I see, but what I don't see, namely, the 10,000 OTHER explosive flashes that'd need to be there for this to be a controlled demolitons job, but aren't. The building was built out of steel, not cardboard tubes and duct tape, so it'd need a lot more than that one flash to bring it down.
What it was is an interesting question, but it wasn't a controlled demolitions charge.
Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by PersonalChoice
What do you see?
It's not what I see, but what I don't see, namely, the 10,000 OTHER explosive flashes that'd need to be there for this to be a controlled demolitons job, but aren't. The building was built out of steel, not cardboard tubes and duct tape, so it'd need a lot more than that one flash to bring it down.
What it was is an interesting question, but it wasn't a controlled demolitions charge.
Exactly, the building was buildt of steel and not cardboard tubes and duct tape, so it would need alot more than one airplane crashing into the top of it.
Interesting take on it, but it wasn't just a plane that brought it down.
VVV
Originally posted by RKWWWW
The building was brought down by the fire which weakened the structure.