The SKYLAB III UFO Encounter - The Evidence & Contradictions , page 1

awesome new video from LunaCognita about the Skylab 3 UFO incident. this sighting has never been explained and the object has not been identified.

LOUSMA: I saw a couple of satellites that appeared like a satellite would on earth.

I saw one that was not like one you would see on earth

www.brumac.8k.com...

reply to post by easynow

---

Ah hA! Lunacognita is a favorite!

*the missing audio from the event (channel A) is a massive RED FLAG!

The black knight for some reason comes to mind:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
and
www.thelivingmoon.com...

...and right on queue ITF - so this must have some merit - because when ITF jumps straight on - you know it's gonna be legit...

Nice post easynow S&F

[edit on 5-9-2010 by watchZEITGEISTnow]

reply to post by easynow

---

It's a very interesting incident and inevitably frustrating for the lack of conclusions we can draw. The Maccabee/Sparks analysis is thorough and the astronauts' training seems to rule out ice particles, localised debris...

Garriot: We observed it for about 10 minutes prior to sunset. It was slowly rotating because it had a variation in brightness with a 10-seconds period. As I was saying, we observed it for about 10 minutes, until we went into darkness, and it also followed us into darkness about 5-seconds later. From the 5 to 10 second delay in it's disappearance we surmised that it was not more than 30 to 50 nautical miles [35 to 58 statute miles or 56 to 93 km] from our location. From its original position in the wardroom window, it did not move more than 10 or 20 degrees over the 10 minutes or so that we watched it.

Maccabee and Sparks crunch some numbers that suggest whatever the object was, it was at least 112 feet (37 m) in size. It's early and I have to run, but I seem to remember this analysis also indicated the object began to increase in velocity? If these figures are all accurate, we have an object possibly larger than anything in orbit at the time. Bizarrely, the unidentified object somehow gains speed. Fascinating and inconclusive!

reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts

I didn't bother with the video

i know the real reason why you didn't



reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow

Ah hA! Lunacognita is a favorite!
*the missing audio from the event (channel A) is a massive RED FLAG!

Ah HAH ! LOL

yes you are correct on both accounts : )




reply to post by Exuberant1

That makes sense to do.

indeed it does, denial is futile




reply to post by JimOberg

it actually could have been quite close, a piece of debris

why Jim, that sounds just like a "standard response" ? LOL

www.abovetopsecret.com...




reply to post by theMegaladon

There is no biased opinion or agenda that i can see.

thanks and i agree, LunaCognita did not show any bias in the presentation.




reply to post by Kandinsky

this analysis also indicated the object began to increase in velocity?

yes i believe you are correct, not sure what can explain that ?

it might be worth noting that 1 month later, Captain Coyne and the Crew of a Huey helicopter were flying over Ohio and spotted a unidentified red light off in the distance which later approached them and almost caused a collision ! was this red light ufo the same thing photographed by the Skylab crew ?

UH -1 Huey

The four-man crew of an Army Reserve UH-1H helicopter, based in Cleveland, Ohio, was returning from Columbus, Ohio, at about 10:30 p.m. following regularly scheduled physical examinations. It was a clear, starry night with no moon. They were cruising at 90 knots at an altitude of 2,500 feet above sea level, over farmland and rolling hills. Lt. Arrigo Jezzi, 26, was at the controls from the left-hand seat. Sgt. John Healey, 35, the flight medic, sat behind him. In the right rear seat was Spec. 5 Robert Yanacek, 23, the crew chief. Commanding the flight from the right front seat was Capt. Lawrence J. Coyne, 36, a 19-year veteran of the Army Reserve.


About 11:00 p.m. near Mansfield, Ohio, Healey saw a red light off to the left (west) heading south. Three or four minutes later, Yanacek noticed a single steady red light on the eastern horizon, and reported it to Coyne. About 30 seconds later, Yanacek announced that the light appeared to be converging on the helicopter, and they all watched it warily.

more info on this case www.abovetopsecret.com...




Skylab 3 incident - September 20, 1973

Coyne Helicopter incident - October 18, 1973.

both cases involved a ufo that appeared as a red light.

just a coincidence ?

[edit on 6-9-2010 by easynow]

reply to post by easynow

---

i have a few simple easy thoughts i would like to share.

why would the government tolerate people making claims about ufo's and spreading lies (since it would be a threat to national security) without rounding people up and arresting them for fraud or something, if there was not some level of truth in the ufo phenomenon?

who is monopolizing the information? why?

those are some of my thoughts and questions concerning the ufo phenomenon.


[edit on 6-9-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

reply to post by Esoteric Teacher

---

they tolerate it so the alphabet agency's can gather intelligence and they don't arrest people because it's not about proclamations and speculation, it's all about what you can prove. if you could prove something you would either be bought off, discredited or terminated.

even with no hard proof, anyone that gets close to the truth and is articulate and can present evidence in a coherent manor that the general public will understand, will have a discrediting campaign launched against them. look at what has been said in this very thread about researchers, look at the first reply, it was carefully crafted to get people to lose interest in watching the video, and look what happened to people like James McDonald. nuff said ?

it is my opinion, NASA has an agenda to discredit all conspiracies about Astronauts, ufo's and any evidence that puts NASA in a bad light. it's ok with them if you bring this subject up because they want to know where the leaks are so they can plug it with counter-intelligence operations.

The CIA has the mission of collecting all published civilian UFO
intelligence data. An Air Force public information release (still
in use) tells us that their investigation of UFOs ended with the
deactivation of Project Blue Book. Further, it says that UFO
investigations have been turned over to academic institutions and
civilian UFO research organizations. In practice, this means that
information of genuine scientific value will not be overlooked. In
other words, Blue Book never really ended, it just changed hands.
And, whether you know it or not, or like it or not, you are part
of the intelligence-gathering network, feeding straight to the
CIA's UFO files. But this particular brand of intelligence data is
perfectly open to the public, in the form of UFO books, journals
and public meetings. And this presents the government with a
unique problem. As a UFO researcher, you are simultaneously
gathering data for the government, and trying to break through the
wall of secrecy to discover what the government knows. You are
spying for them, and spying on them. By spying on your own
government and, in fact, doing so in a very aggressive manner, you
automatically trigger the counter-intelligence machinery.

ftp.fortunaty.net...

Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher

---

they tolerate it so the alphabet agency's can gather intelligence and they don't arrest people because it's not about proclamations and speculation, it's all about what you can prove. if you could prove something you would either be bought off, discredited or terminated.

no kidding. you don't say. i might just believe ya.

reply to post by easynow

---

Easynow.....

Actually, I've always found this case very interesting.

In fact, to my mind it is the only "space based" video that seems to be able to withstand some level of scrutiny.

I have mentioned that & linked to your original thread on several occasions.

I have linked to your original thread here, for interest & convenience.

I hope this case doesn't "unravel" over time.....I do like the ones that remain to my mind....."unexplained"!

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not


[edit on 7-9-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]

Originally posted by JimOberg

The puzzling aspect of this story is the squiggle and why it is at odds with the other stills, and with the eyewitness recollections of a point source.

Maybe you could ask a great reclusive ET contactee yourself?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by easynow
reply to post by redwoodjedi

---

thanks for the reply ,

i did think about the dropa looking ufo's... but felt that they were not really similar enough to make the connection. imo

but i did come across this


Stehpensville light's ...Texas UFO pics

and then compared to dorothy's they seem to have some similarities imo

this was discussed in this thread here
www.abovetopsecret.com...&colorshift=yes&colorshift=yes
Stephenville lights - Dorothy Izatt and the moon, page 1

Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags

Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 15 days ago with 60 member flags

New UFO footage from my hometown
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags

UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags

The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 16 days ago with 28 member flags

The Edge of Reality - Updated Report on the Illinois Police UFO case, January 5th, 2000.
  Posted 3 days ago with 26 member flags

Famous Argentinean painter observed UFO studying parabolic antennas
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags

1/28/2012 craft in sky From Puerto Rico - Need help getting more info!!
  Posted 4 days ago with 20 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: