posted on Sep, 4 2010 @ 01:11 PM
Whaddaya guys think?? You're gonna hurt my feelings? : ) Try, Try again.
Yeah, I've seen 'A-Rod.' He is the third baseman for the New York Yankees. Also leads the league in strikeouts - and was once suspended for
violating the substance abuse policy of the MLB.
I agree with you. The 'RODS Phenomenon' is ludicrous. Yet, you continually reassign the responsibility of that farce upon me. Maybe it is because
you have noted some paralells in resemblance - but I think it is more likely a tactic of discrediting my studies.
Some of you folks spend so much time and energy on this thread; that it is almost as if you have a stake in it. Might I add, that - this little fact
has not escaped my attention - and is highly-suspicious. If it is so much 'marlarkey' - why waste your time here??
I believe that what the skeptics are really trying to convince folks of is; "Don't try it." "Move along! Nothing to see here!"
For those out there who aren't trying to 'save the world from dis-information' - ---
'Solar Obliteration' was the first installment of a developing story. It has evolved far beyond it's modest beginnings. Remember, I am 15 years
ahead of you folks on this topic.
The true jist of the story:
Scientifically; the visible light spectrum is but a narrow band of what exists. For more than 50 years now - military units across the world - have
proven that direct light can be used to conceal what is really there. One application of this is called 'Camouflage.' Look it up if you don't
believe that it exists.
98.9% of the Universe is outside our visual range – ( known as a ‘Hertzean Wave.’) Hertz demonstrated that there are long, transverse waves that
travel at the velocity of light and can be reflected, refracted, and polarized .
There are many ways to discover things unseen , Infra red , Ultraviolet , Mathematics , Electron Microscopes etc. Using filters on videos and
photographs is a very ordinary & standard practice.
The CCD elements of videocams have the ability to detect and record aspects of light that the human eye simply cannot. It is apparently prominent in
the wavelengths that are near the infra. To understand near infra-red light, you first have to understand the word spectrum.
A spectrum is the distribution of colors produced when white light is dispersed by a prism or what is known as a diffraction grating. With respect to
the spectrum, there is a continuous change in wavelength from red, the longest wavelength, to violet, the shortest wavelength.
Primarily, 7 colors are usually distinguished. They are violet, indigo, red, green, yellow, orange and red. Just beyond the red end of the spectrum,
there exists an mostly-invisible light, known as near-infrared. This is really old stuff, discovered by William Herschel – more than 200 years
So, you can throw away my images, I don’t care. ‘Rods’ – well, hey… I would love to see them burn on Denny White’s woodpile. ( Loved the
fact that you found that video, Freelance. I can use that in the future. )
Digital video cameras – and even web cams – come equipped with either CCD or CMOS light sensor chips. These light sensing chips are far better
than a person’s eye when it comes to detecting the near-infra.
Manufacturers of these devises actually intentionally install filters to reduce this effect. (DSLR = ‘Limiter’) But these cameras are only
capable of recording good images of still objects – and are pretty weak at getting good shots of UFO’s.
Without that filter – a video of a person would look more like Kirlian photography. (Probably would not be a good selling point for Sony : )
But these filters also reduce the video camera’s ability to detect UFO’s. A DSLR can see some infra-red; but it would require a much longer
exposure time. (Unfortunately, the UFO’s just won’t stand still long enough for this.)
And if the air is not quite still, the moving parts of the image will inevitably be blurry. I believe that this is the reason why there are so few
(if any) clear shots of UFO’s.
Knowingly or not, I think this type of aspect is at least partially responsible - for why T.J. Constable was so successful to when he filmed what he
refers to as ‘Critters’ - in IR.
Back then, T.J. Constable was using what was, in actuality – a near-Infra-Red lens filter. It records near-Infra-red light. A camera that records
what is known as Deep-Infra-Red is referred to as a F.L.I.R. That technology concentrates on recording heat signatures.
The modern version of technology that most closely replicates what Mr. Constable was doing is referred to as ‘Night Shot Mode.’ Folks can read
up on that technology at ‘maxmax.com.’
Again, folks can totally dismiss ‘S.O.’ method. As I am not selling any videos or books, what possible impact could it really have on my life?
Is it potentially going to ‘ruin my reputation?’ Have any of you really thought that through? Hmmm.
But I have had 15 years to study this since the ‘SIGHTINGS’ episode. I know one helluva lot more than I could post up at ATS. That other stuff
was Kindergarten – compared to what has been learned since. It truly is now just a nostalgic piece of UFO Folklore.
Hey, people ( mostly ) no longer believe in the ‘Face on Mars’ – but it will forever remain a piece of the history of the development of this
genre.’ I prefer to think of it as being akin to the job of a police detective. You follow up on all leads – and can be wrong 1,000 times. But,
in the end… you only need to be ‘right’ once.
I am currently a musician for a living. And we have an old saying in the biz; “It’s only a wrong note – if you stop playing.”
Freelance – as far as your statement ‘John must have some pretty big balls’ – well, I was unaware that that information had leaked out to the
public. : )
I think that you skeptics really just want my information removed – so that you can get back to pushing your version of ‘reality.’ So, far –
it is not working. But if the moderators remove my materials in just 2 minutes from now; I have already achieved my purpose here. And you can only
speculate what that truly means.
‘Hiding in the light’ - “Johnbro’