It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unity_99
and all soul progresses.
Originally posted by Unity_99
You can search for evidence of the holographic universe yourself,
But what doesnt make sense is what scientists are clinging to, creation of something out of nothing
Once you hit on the key points, logic starts to tell you the rest, and your own soul/Higher Self can boost if you are loving enough, they operate on the love frequency.
They havnt figured infinity into the picture, and as a platform everything in it is infinite.
In a free will duliaty system, you get sent back as well, and your level of frequency, thoughts and actions, determine your next world, your creating your next existence now. And you can also be sent back like Groundhog Day the movie literally, repeating.
Google hologrpahic universe, and also holographs in general, ask yourself what represents the lasers/projectors in this system.
Originally posted by CynicalM
reply to post by woodwardjnr
“Because there is a law such as gravity
Last I heard no one could really explain gravity..
Pretty much sums up his book as nothing more than fiction..
Like, who knows for sure what happened 10,000 years ago, let alone a few billion years or more???
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Any post with Stephen Hawkings is wasted on ATS because he will be attacked for relying on evidence instead of speculation and faith.
Originally posted by depth om
reply to post by spacevisitor
Yea it's like he's floating in some lofty realm where he sees the absolutes of all notions, and by peering into the void of mind he "knows" "god" "was not needed" for creation of the universe.
Cmon steve, let's come back down to earth buddy.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by depth om
reply to post by spacevisitor
Yea it's like he's floating in some lofty realm where he sees the absolutes of all notions, and by peering into the void of mind he "knows" "god" "was not needed" for creation of the universe.
Cmon steve, let's come back down to earth buddy.
What exactly is wrong with his concept? Everything in the observable universe is explainable without the need to invoke deities. Why would we need one to explain the beginning of the universe? If we do, where is the evidence for this deity, how is it defined and how can we test it?