reply to post by loner007
So the police don't 'buy it' was suicide, and suspect him of murder, why was he released if he was accused/suspected of 1st degree murder?
Why was he allowed to use his passport and travel?
All this just a few short months after refusing to hand over the evidence he'd documented during October at ground zero? Convenient.
For the record, i don't 'buy' his estranged wife's death was suicide either. Whether or not it was Kurt or an ABC agent that offed her, to set him
up is another story.
So, what have we got?
We have a young FEMA agent, solely tasked with photographically documenting the worst 'terrorist' atrocity ever to be perpetrated on US soil..ONE
single solitary agent, crawling through and around the rubble and debris.
Why only one? Surely a crime of this magnitude would at least warrant a team?
Then he realizes that some of what he has imaged and videotaped doesn't add up, and decides to keep the images and video, and refuses to hand them
Then all of a sudden, he is a drug user and heavy drinker, reportedly smoking heroin on holiday (with his wife) in Thailand.
As you know, we ALL go on holiday and partake in the hardest drugs we can get our hands on don't we!
This has to be absurd rubbish. If you work for an organisation like FEMA, you would be subject to constant and random drug and alcohol testing, you
could not be into smoking smack and guzzling bottles of hard booze, and hope to get away with it.
Then his wife files for legal separation, yet decides to go to a New Years eve party with him...the bloke she so wants rid of, enough to desert him on
holiday, even going to the US consulate to obtain a new passport, she initiates divorce proceedings, yet she still thinks him good enough company to
go to a party with, and home with him afterward?
They suspect him of her murder, he claims it was suicide (if he didn't see or hear anyone else enter and leave the home, he would assume suicide),
yet they release him to flee to Argentina (with the documentation they want from him).
This whole thing reeks of the Assange attempt of late, shoddy, awkward and fumbling attempts to discredit and whitewash whatever evidence the guy
As i've said, i have no proof one way or the other, but this story wouldn't look out of place in a 'Bourne' type movie.
The only thing to do, will be to examine the video (if it's released) very carefully indeed, that way - if damning evidence is discovered, all the
smear campaigns in the world, won't change what's been caught on tape for the world to see.