It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Federal government admits not testing for arsenic, mercury or other toxic heavy metals in seafood
The US government, and even President Obama himself, have said that Gulf seafood is safe to eat in the wake of the massive BP oil spill.
But an admission from the federal government that it hasn't been testing Gulf seafood for toxic heavy metals, and news that fishermen are being forced to sign waivers making them liable for toxins in their catch, suggest not everyone is convinced of the safety of Gulf seafood.
Louisiana fishermen's activist Kindra Arnesen says dock owners are asking fi
Louisiana fishermen's activist Kindra Arnesen says dock owners are asking fishermen to sign waivers that put the full responsibility for toxins found in the catch on the fishermen themselves...
Originally posted by rogerstigers
...What happens if they choose not to sign the waiver?
Originally posted by rogerstigers
reply to post by soficrow
So if they do not sign the waiver, they are not legally allowed to sell the fish they catch? How does that work? Did BP gain some sort of governmental authority?
I am having a hard time wrapping my head around how BP can legally do this.
Originally posted by rogerstigers
reply to post by soficrow
So if they do not sign the waiver, they are not legally allowed to sell the fish they catch? How does that work? Did BP gain some sort of governmental authority?
I am having a hard time wrapping my head around how BP can legally do this.
So if they do not sign the waiver, they are not legally allowed to sell the fish they catch? How does that work? Did BP gain some sort of governmental authority?
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to post by whaaa
further reading the article oe will discover:
Louisiana fishermen's activist Kindra Arnesen says dock owners are asking fishermen to sign waivers that put the full responsibility for toxins found in the catch on the fishermen themselves...
So this is an action taken unilaterally by the Dock Owners...
not the Government..
just why & how the Dock Owners decided to impose the waivers to
the fisherman, to accept liability... is beyond me...
perhaps their Lawyers told them to enforce waivers so as to not be liable themselves for the condition of the seafood catch.
Originally posted by whaaa
Activist: Gulf fishermen being held responsible for toxic seafood
The concerns of fisherman and scientists alike seem to contradict the positive tone the federal government has taken with respect to oil in the Gulf.
"Let me be clear: Seafood from the Gulf … is safe to eat,” President Obama recently said at an appearance in Theodore, Alabama.
It's "important for consumers... to know that their food is safe, but it’s also important for the fishermen and processors, who need to be able to sell their products with confidence,” Obama said.