Originally posted by projectnsearch
Again, look at the evidence and watch all the evidence that Dimitri Khalezov has before you say that it CAN'T be because until you know how the
technology works, you have no idea what you are talking about.
Nothing else turns steel to DUST! High Explosives doesn't do it and Thermate and Thermite can't do it, so that means that it had to be something
else involved. Beam weapons are possible but why go after a beam weapon theory when there is TONS of evidence for the micro nuke.
Again, go look at this page and ALL the evidence and tell me how a beam weapon causes Tritium levels to go to 55 times normal! Only a nuke of some
type would do that and that was the ORIGINAL plan as Dimitri heard as a member of the Soviet nuclear forces in the 70's! In fact, they got a BIG
chuckle out of the crazy Americans wanting to demolish the Twin towers someday with a micro nuke because our government had to FILE that plan with the
Russians as that was protocol for either super power to use their demolition nukes!
It's funny how these people that cry "no micro nukes" post madly how it can't be but NEVER address all of Dimitri's evidence. They don't even
watch his videos.
For instance, one of the big lies of 911 was when our government gave all the workers "air quality" badges that were the same size as a nuclear
radiation badge. They were flat cards as thin as credit card. They were EXACTLY the same size and thickness of a radiation badge except these badges
were WHITE and unmarked! If they were really air quality badges then how come no company name on them? This is exactly the cover story they would
have used. Again this radiation would have been very contained to the very center of the molten core so it would not kill you unless you got a very
high dose and as they rotated people out they would have minimized it but I think this explains all the crazy cancers that came out of this.
Again if you would have looked at the evidence, a micro nuke designed to take down a building is carefully designed to pulverize all the material of
the building to dust that is in the crush zone but it does that without ANY explosion because the nuke is buried. However since there were cracks and
fissures and steam coming up, there was some radiation for a while before the molten material left behind cooled.
Still more evidence comes from the fact that they couldn't cool the area down fully until 6 months which is exactly how long it would take to cool
off the molten material using every technology available. They were pulling molten steel out of the hole for months.
And finally, they didn't call it "Ground Zero" for nothing! Look it up in the dictionary and it will say "The area immediately above or below a
NUCLEAR explosion. They put it right in your face. LOL
I've never seen any evidence of micro-nukes. As has been pointed out, there was no steel dust found at the WTC site that I've ever seen. There is
also no example in existence of any building being demolished with a micro-nuke. How do I know? Because I know the laws of physics are rarely
If you really believe a micro-nuke went off, then I have a challenge for you. You can bet $1,000 along with 100 other people who believe you. Then
I'll bet $2,000 you are wrong and put the money in escrow. If the excavated dirt shows signs of being glassed over and radioactive, then you get the
money from all the people who put $2,000 in escrow. As for your side's $100,000, you can spend it to excavate the dirt.
There is zero evidence of micro-nukes from the WTC site. Ash from fires often has naturally elevated radiation levels.
As for tritium levels being 55 times normal, maybe that is normal for an office fire. And maybe not. Either way, I've never seen any evidence that
tritium levels were 55 times normal at the WTC site.
I've never seen anything about clean-up workers having card-size air quality badges either even though I have read a few of the micro-nuke threads
which were not the slightest bit convincing.
Hydraulic pressure works in all direction. Once a micro-nuke cracks through the basement of the WTC it will instantly expand in all directions, most
notably outside the FIRST FLOOR, seeing how MAXIMUM RESISTANCE would be going up through each floor. The windows would be blown out from the bottom
up. But that isn't what happened.
The idea that the blast wave would travel through WTC1 & 2 as if it were a solid rock is ridiculous and it makes zero sense. To a geologist without
engineering knowledge (like the one advocating the theory) it may make sense on some level but to someone who knows about thermodynamics it makes zero
sense at all.