posted on Aug, 19 2010 @ 03:36 AM
Originally posted by projectnsearch
The micro nukes would have been 10 stories under the foundations
So these micro nukes explode 10 stories underground, but the effects of it exploding causes the buildings to fall from the exact spot the planes
Just stop and think about the garbage you are posting!
This was the plan for those buildings all along because of their super rigid structures couldn't be safely taken down by high explosives in
the building footprint.
Care to show proof of those plans?
Nothing else turns steel to DUST!
Except steel was not turned to dust, nor do nuclear devices turn steel to dust!
when there is TONS of evidence for the micro nuke.
Yet you are unable to post any of this tons of evidence here....
very center of the molten core
except that there was no molten core...
They were pulling molten steel out of the hole for months.
Just another truther lie!
And finally, they didn't call it "Ground Zero" for nothing! Look it up in the dictionary and it will say "The area immediately above or
below a NUCLEAR explosion.
Still wrong, "The term ground zero (sometimes also known as surface zero as distinguished from zero point) may be used to describe the point on
the Earth's surface where an explosion occurs. In the case of an explosion above the ground, ground zero refers to the point on the ground directly
below an explosion (see hypocenter).
The term has often been associated with nuclear explosions and other large bombs, but is also used in relation to earthquakes, epidemics and other
disasters to mark the point of the most severe damage or destruction. The term is often re-used for disasters that have a geographic or conceptual
because our government had to FILE that plan with the Russians as that was protocol for either super power to use their demolition nukes!
Exactly which protocol are you on about here?
[edit on 19/8/10 by dereks]