It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ghost of Chewie
Oh yeah..... Politicians dont follow the Constitution... Thats why their politicians.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by Ghost of Chewie
Oh yeah..... Politicians dont follow the Constitution... Thats why their politicians.
then they need to be fired
and tried as traitors
Originally posted by links234
That's right! No thoughtcrime!
Severe punishment for those we disagree with.
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."
The ABA Commission on Ethics and Professional Responsibility also addressed the issue in Formal Opinion 95-391.
It said: "We believe that the use of the title 'Judge' in legal communications and pleadings, as well as on a law office nameplate or letterhead, is misleading insofar as it is likely to create an unjustified expectation about the results a lawyer can achieve and to exaggerate the influence the lawyer may be able to wield. In fact, there appears to be no reason for such use of the title other than to create such an expectation or to gain an unfair advantage over an opponent."
Attack the argument, not the presenter. Maybe you could learn a couple things about the rule of LAW.
Unless an argument or piece of evidence is debated, that argument or evidence is considered to be FACT.
So what you are saying is, what the JUDGE presents is fact.
That will be $2000 please, I just taught you the basics of court discipline.
That would usually cost a lot more, but for you I will give you a discount.
We are a nation that has a government -- not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the earth. Our Government has no power except that granted it by the people. It is time to check and reverse the growth of government which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed.
It is my intention to curb the size and influence of the Federal establishment and to demand recognition of the distinction between the powers granted to the Federal Government and those reserved to the states or to the people.